Page 1 of 1
Football Novice question.
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 10:10 pm
by NikiH
Ok I am not an expert or even close but I was wondering if perhaps our receivers looked horrible because their coach was MIA. I mean the guy has a damn good reason not to be there but could that be why they had a hard time?? Hixon would be key to their performance I would think. Again just a rookie observation.
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:11 pm
by ANT7088
Maybe, but if a ball is coming towards your neck, hits your hands and you don't catch it, it doesn't matter if Elmer (the glue guy) is on the sidelines. I think Coles looked pretty good!
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 11:11 pm
by Justice Hog
Following up on the WR concerns. Was McCants inactive again today? I think we could have used him, being such a physical receiver, today. I agree with you, Niki, that not having the WR coach around surely didn't help.
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:19 am
by DEHog
Niki great question...I never even thought of how that could have affected the team let alone our receivers
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:21 am
by redskinz4ever
just catch the ball !!!! PERIOD !!
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 7:47 am
by hogred
McCants would have caught that ball Gardner dropped in the endzone..
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 8:41 am
by SkinsChic
They need to CATCH THE BALL....that shouldn't have to be coached !!!
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 8:45 am
by redskinz4ever
SkinsChic wrote:They need to CATCH THE BALL....that shouldn't have to be coached !!!
true thus the name wide receiver and there job description is to CATCH THE BALL !!!
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:55 am
by Jake
Justice Hog wrote:Was McCants inactive again today?
Yes, unfortunately.