Page 1 of 1
ESPN Position Rankings
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:27 pm
by Cardas
ESPN has our posistion rankings (out of 32) as follows
2004 NFL Unit Rankings
Team QB RB WR OL DL LB DB ST
8. Redskins 10 7 6 16 28 9 13 11
Mostly due to Portis and Gibbs, but also because of Coles.
http://proxy.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1858398
or am I scooped on this one too
Re: ESPN Position Rankings
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:31 pm
by gambit187
Cardas wrote:ESPN has our posistion rankings (out of 32) as follows
2004 NFL Unit Rankings
Team QB RB WR OL DL LB DB ST
8. Redskins 10 7 6 16 28 9 13 11
Mostly due to Portis and Gibbs, but also because of Coles.
http://proxy.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1858398or am I scooped on this one too
or am I scooped on this one too
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:44 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Defensive line 28
Are we really that bad
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 1:46 pm
by Redskin in Canada
I forgot to say that I feel that we are higher at safety than 11!
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:51 pm
by hailskins666
28 is about right. i can't think of too many lines that i wouldn't take over ours.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:23 pm
by gambit187
hailskins666 wrote:28 is about right. i can't think of too many lines that i wouldn't take over ours.
Ok I know I am gonna hear the Closet Skin Fan Jokes, BUT 28 is a little LOW. Even in this DIE hard COWBOY fans 4 eyes. I would say anywhere from 15-20.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:02 pm
by box8276
hailskins666 wrote:28 is about right. i can't think of too many lines that i wouldn't take over ours.
i can think of more than 4 that are not better than ours. I believe our dline is gonna surprise this year. As i stated in another post this line is a run stopping unit and if they do their job this d will look good.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:04 pm
by Redskins Rule
Closet Skins Fan wrote:Ok I know I am gonna hear the Closet Skin Fan Jokes, BUT 28 is a little LOW. Even in this DIE hard COWBOY fans 4 eyes. I would say anywhere from 15-20.
Your right!!! I think we are much better then 28 myself.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:05 pm
by redskincity
Yeah our line will remain low until we prove we are the right stuff
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:39 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
or am I scooped on this one too
Jake has these guys
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:11 pm
by Arrington56
ST is for the special teams. Safety is included in the DB's
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:41 am
by Cardas
What I find interesting is that last year it was widely thought that Denver had on of the worst Defensive backfields. The addition of Champ and Lynce are upgrades of course...but all the way to 5th place for DBs seams a bit of a stretch to me.