Page 1 of 1

WIDE RECIEVER #3

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:25 am
by MEZZSKIN
Hey guys which player looks like he has a leg up so far..THRASH OR MCCANTS....whos getting more reps??...have you seen anything that will clue us in on who Gibbs likes more at this point............ps..as a side question how is SULTAN MCCULOUGH doing??...Boy he looked good last preseason has he stood out at all yet?.....

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:29 am
by Justice Hog
My gut tells me Thrash is going to be our #3 guy. When we get in the Red Zone, however, don't be surprised when good ol' Gibbs throughs a 4 WR set out there with McCants (our best red zone threat) entering the game.

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:32 am
by DEHog
Thrash looks good...but DMAC look GREAT! Hell he's pushing Rod for #2 ,the guy's a flatout player! Has made some difficult catches look routine. Thrash dropped a TD from Brunell down the middle on Sunday. DMAC size gives him a leg up on Thrash, he ill create mismatches in the slot

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:42 am
by MEZZSKIN
I loved Mccants last year, but i also feel Thrash was misused in philly as a wideout..This is a very interesting battle....because that position historically for Gibbs IS THE BIG PLAY position(ie: r sanders, a. garret).....Thrash seems to be better at strecthing the field and Mccants is a red zone beast....and both are very proud players...im rooting for Mccants because hes young and has a higher ceiling ---He could be the replacement for Gardner

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:05 pm
by riggofan
I like McCants alot, but I'm betting on Thrash.

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:11 pm
by RedskinsFreak
McCants is just showing too well in the three practices I've seen.

I think the top 4 are clearly defined -- Coles, Gardner, Thrash and McCants. #5 is the big question. Jacobs? Cloman? Russell? Someone else?

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 3:28 pm
by SkinsChic
Our new #2 receiver:

Image

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 4:22 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Or that. (BTW, NICE shootin'!)

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 4:56 pm
by redskincity
SkinsChic wrote:Our new #2 receiver:

Image


I hope you get your wish. We need playmakers. When we do decide to throw the ball we are going to need someone who really wants the job.

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 6:42 pm
by JR_USCG_GOSKINS
Thrash is going to be #3, only because McCants is going to be number #2..... 8)

Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:15 pm
by HogInBlacksburg
DEHog wrote: DMAC size gives him a leg up on Thrash, he ill create mismatches in the slot


I agree with that. I think he will be atleast #3. I wouldn't be surprised to see Coles lined up in the slot some. Thrash will probably be #4 and a sp. teams warrior.

Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 10:01 am
by redskinz4ever
SkinsChic wrote:Our new #2 receiver:

Image
man i hope you are right ...he's DA MAN 8) REDSKINZ4EVER !!!