Page 1 of 7

How Long Should They Play Griffin Without Improvement?

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:45 pm
by OldSchool
I question Griffin's readiness to play physically, mentally and his ability to deal with those issues while trying to upgrade his pocket passing skills. His performances in the two games were similar, he was utterly inactive until garbage time. Feel good Griffin completions against sated defenses playing out the game in prevent seemed useful in game 1 but after a nearly identical hapless 3 quarters in the second game I've seen enough, it's time to sit him down to mend and work on his mechanics and other issues.

The Skins blew their chance to defeat the Seahawks by keeping the Griffin in the game when he was hurt and ineffective. Instead of putting Griffin on the bench the Skins lost the game and Griffin magnified his injury. After watching him in two games the Skins need to show they learned from their playoff debacle. He isn't getting it done and the problem obviously more than rust and he is already talking about running more and carrying the team, a recipe for another disaster.

Aside from Griffin's well being the season is just 2 games old and the Skins need to put Cousins on the field and see if he can keep them in the playoff race. Griffin doesn't have his great speed and mobility now and is currently ineffective without it, he could help his team and himself by taking a seat.

How many games do the rest of you think the Skins should give Griffin before making a change?

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:50 pm
by GBpack10
You did the same thing I did. Start 3 topics lol. Something wrong with the submit button lol.

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:56 pm
by Countertrey
I have no idea what the cheesehead is talking about... :^o

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:58 pm
by GBpack10
Countertrey wrote:I have no idea what the cheesehead is talking about... :^o

I went to start that topic I just started and 3 topics were all of a sudden on the board.

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:04 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
This thread is dumb.

I wonder how bad all the cry baby sheli fans are complaining in NY....
I THOUGHT HE WAS ELITE NOW? LOLOL
His stats are crap compared to rgiii.. the sky isnot falling folks, nothing to see here.


Smmfh

Re: How Long Should They Play Griffin Without Improvement?

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:22 pm
by Deadskins
OldSchool wrote:His performances in the two games were similar

No, they weren't. Against the Smeagols, he came out rusty. His footwork was all off, and didn't get better until the third quarter. He showed obvious signs of not having played in a game for eight months. Against the Packers, it was a completely different story. The issue wasn't his mechanics at all. I didn't feel like that was on RGIII, but more of a team effort.

OldSchool wrote:How many games do the rest of you think the Skins should give Griffin before making a change?

16

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:31 pm
by frankcal20
RG3 actually showed a lot of improvement. The issue is that by the end of the first QTR we are only able to run the 2 min offense because we are so far behind. I'm not putting blame on the defense or the offense. I'm putting blame on both the defense AND offense. RG3 is playing his 3rd preseason game so hopefully we will see the biggest growth in his game. Thankfully the bye week couldn't' come at a better time for us. RG3 plays and continues to play because he needs the snaps to gain confidence in his knee. With knee surgeries, getting back int he game is mostly mention. There's a lack of trust and a bit of fear that you could get hurt again but once you get hit or do something great the fear seeps away and we should see RG3 of old.

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 10:56 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
frankcal20 wrote:RG3 actually showed a lot of improvement. The issue is that by the end of the first QTR we are only able to run the 2 min offense because we are so far behind. I'm not putting blame on the defense or the offense. I'm putting blame on both the defense AND offense. RG3 is playing his 3rd preseason game so hopefully we will see the biggest growth in his game. Thankfully the bye week couldn't' come at a better time for us. RG3 plays and continues to play because he needs the snaps to gain confidence in his knee. With knee surgeries, getting back int he game is mostly mention. There's a lack of trust and a bit of fear that you could get hurt again but once you get hit or do something great the fear seeps away and we should see RG3 of old.


Wow, thanks for.the breath of fresh air... Logical posts seem.to only come from.a select few these days. :lol:

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:05 pm
by frankcal20
Sorry I don't post as often as I used to. Career going well and two kids under 4 yrs old will keep you busy.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:46 am
by StorminMormon86
frankcal20 wrote:RG3 actually showed a lot of improvement. The issue is that by the end of the first QTR we are only able to run the 2 min offense because we are so far behind. I'm not putting blame on the defense or the offense. I'm putting blame on both the defense AND offense. RG3 is playing his 3rd preseason game so hopefully we will see the biggest growth in his game. Thankfully the bye week couldn't' come at a better time for us. RG3 plays and continues to play because he needs the snaps to gain confidence in his knee. With knee surgeries, getting back int he game is mostly mention. There's a lack of trust and a bit of fear that you could get hurt again but once you get hit or do something great the fear seeps away and we should see RG3 of old.

I ususally agree with you (I agree with 99% of this post), but I cannot stand when people say "this is his 3rd preseason game", because it's not. This is the regular season now. If we go 0-4 into the bye week are we all going to be content and say "well at least he got his preseason out of the way, now on to his regular season"?

Hindsight is 20/20, so it's too late to second guess the decision to start Griffin over Cousins in week 1. And there is no way that Griffin will ever get benched for Cousins. Never going to happen.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:38 am
by Irn-Bru
I know the rust and 3 and outs have been aggravating, but our offense really isn't the problem, and RGIII specifically isn't a problem, either. They will find their groove. Our defense needs to step it up big time. There's where the real concern is.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:39 am
by StorminMormon86
Irn-Bru wrote:I know the rust and 3 and outs have been aggravating, but our offense really isn't the problem, and RGIII specifically isn't a problem, either. They will find their groove. Our defense needs to step it up big time. There's where the real concern is.

Our defense was never top caliber to begin with. Last year our O carried the defense. The only way we will be able to win games (especially against high scoring opposing offenses) is to outscore the other teams. We've got to increase our TOP dramatically too.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:42 am
by riggofan
Seriously? This is our franchise QB that we traded three first round picks for. We're going to bench him because we've started 0-2.

Give me a freaking break.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:11 am
by DaSkinz Baby
If you ask me, I don't think he should have been allowed to play until after the bye week. I think him coming back was nothing more than a ploy to get fans excited. If we are going to run the same offense that we run with Rex or Kirk, than start Kirk, if you want to run the read option use Pat White, it's evident IMHO that RGIII isn't able to do what he did last year and I don't think we have the time to lose games waiting for him to heal......

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 12:23 pm
by riggofan
DaSkinz Baby wrote:If you ask me, I don't think he should have been allowed to play until after the bye week. I think him coming back was nothing more than a ploy to get fans excited. If we are going to run the same offense that we run with Rex or Kirk, than start Kirk, if you want to run the read option use Pat White, it's evident IMHO that RGIII isn't able to do what he did last year and I don't think we have the time to lose games waiting for him to heal......


Its a fair point. There was a lot of discussion about this before the season though I would say it was 80-20 in favor or RGIII starting.

I don't really know what was behind the rush to get him back for week 1. It did seem a little unthinkable to me coming off that injury that he would be able to start. Was it really the team trying to generate hype? Do the Redskins really ever need to generate hype before the first week of the season? hah. Was the pressure from the RGIII camp?

All that said, I personally think they need to stick with RGIII. Maybe a different story if we had a defense playing well and losing games 17-3 or something. I'm just not buying that Kirk Cousins was going to be the difference maker against the Packers last weekend.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 12:44 pm
by DaSkinz Baby
riggofan wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:If you ask me, I don't think he should have been allowed to play until after the bye week. I think him coming back was nothing more than a ploy to get fans excited. If we are going to run the same offense that we run with Rex or Kirk, than start Kirk, if you want to run the read option use Pat White, it's evident IMHO that RGIII isn't able to do what he did last year and I don't think we have the time to lose games waiting for him to heal......


Its a fair point. There was a lot of discussion about this before the season though I would say it was 80-20 in favor or RGIII starting.

I don't really know what was behind the rush to get him back for week 1. It did seem a little unthinkable to me coming off that injury that he would be able to start. Was it really the team trying to generate hype? Do the Redskins really ever need to generate hype before the first week of the season? hah. Was the pressure from the RGIII camp?

All that said, I personally think they need to stick with RGIII. Maybe a different story if we had a defense playing well and losing games 17-3 or something. I'm just not buying that Kirk Cousins was going to be the difference maker against the Packers last weekend.


Well in thinking what made sense was him meaning RGIII to be able to say he came back even faster than AP, however I think that this being his second ACL issue on the same knee and Dr. Andrews needing to take ligaments out of his other knee made this an impossible feat.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 1:35 pm
by langleyparkjoe
You play RG3 until he gets injured (knock on wood), benching him isn't an option.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 1:52 pm
by Countertrey
langleyparkjoe wrote:You play RG3 UNLESS he gets injured (knock on wood), benching him isn't an option.


Fixed it for you... that feels much more optimistic, sparkly, and super-special all that... :wink:

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:00 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Countertrey wrote:
langleyparkjoe wrote:You play RG3 UNLESS he gets injured (knock on wood), benching him isn't an option.


Fixed it for you... that feels much more optimistic, sparkly, and super-special all that... :wink:


Thanks my brutha! :lol:

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:01 pm
by markshark84
You play him as long as his play is progressing week to week. If he is regressing or showing a lack of confidence on his knee, then you need to pull him --- for his own good.

RG3 has been a shade of what he was last year. If it has been decided that he will not run under any circumstance, then you need to change the offense. The pistol without a QB threat of taking off is ineffective.

I personally have not seen many positives in his return. He has been inconsistent throwing, restricted offensively, and not confident.

If he is truly as "healthy" as the team wants us and the media to believe, MS/KS would let RGIII play the game more instinctually -- which is when he's at his best.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:34 pm
by Countertrey
markshark84 wrote:You play him as long as his play is progressing week to week. If he is regressing or showing a lack of confidence on his knee, then you need to pull him --- for his own good.

RG3 has been a shade of what he was last year. If it has been decided that he will not run under any circumstance, then you need to change the offense. The pistol without a QB threat of taking off is ineffective.

I personally have not seen many positives in his return. He has been inconsistent throwing, restricted offensively, and not confident.

If he is truly as "healthy" as the team wants us and the media to believe, MS/KS would let RGIII play the game more instinctually -- which is when he's at his best.
I get this... but look at it this way... there can be no doubt that Bob is improving his pocket passing skills... this is a segment of his game that will need to be groomed NO MATTER WHAT if he is to have a career that goes into his mid 30's. Once the shackles come off, and he is able to return to doing those things that we KNOW he does better than anything else, what he has learned will be added to his bag of tricks. I guarantee you, his vision has improved, just from having to pick the open receivers as the opponents lay back. The threat of Bob running free in the defensive backfield will open up the pocket passing game, as well as his game when setting up on the run.

It does suck big time right now, though...

Re: How Long Should They Play Griffin Without Improvement?

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:40 pm
by GFlanagan3
OldSchool wrote:How many games do the rest of you think the Skins should give Griffin before making a change?
ok....why not run Rexy out there? or re-sign White? let's go in COMPLETE panic mode shall we? ...just wow. He will get it together and soon. Do you REALLY think RGIII is happy with his performance? This man is a warrior let him fight.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:04 pm
by emoses14
And now for something completely different: Link

John Keim wrote:ASHBURN, Va. -- The focus was on leadership. And running with the ball. And dealing with criticism. All the topics are legitimate.

Meanwhile, this one is too: Robert Griffin III improved from the first game to the second -- even if his numbers were built in a blowout. The Washington Redskins saw progress; the throws he made were tougher than what he faced against the Philadelphia Eagles, when all but two of his completions traveled 10 yards or less.


Griffin III
Yes, his legs need to be incorporated more, but it was progress.

“You could see his footwork, just his base and stepping up into the throws, he felt a lot more comfortable,” Redskins coach Mike Shanahan said. “This is a long process. It’s not going to happen overnight. We’ve talked about it before. This is something that he’s going to get better at and better at as time goes on.”

That’s what the Redskins need if they’re going to emerge from the rubble of an 0-2 start. It was hard to know how Griffin would fare once the season began because of his inability to practice during the spring or play in the preseason. Turns out the impact is great, even for a player such as Griffin.

He’s only run the ball nine times, and none off a designed play or zone-read option.

“This is like his second preseason game,” Redskins receiver Santana Moss said. “You’re not going to make him do a bunch of stuff we’re not sure of. Once he gets his feeling back and the coach is confident with him doing all that stuff, I’m sure they’ll let him do more. Right now I don’t think that’s what we need to do to win games … We have [the zone-read option] called, but if they’re keying on him then he’s not going to run the ball, and that’s what teams are doing. You’ll see him hand the ball off. I’m glad he’s doing that because we don’t need that right now.”

Griffin said Wednesday that he knows his legs provide a spark for the offense. It can provide a temporary solution, but it’s his passing that needs to be more consistent. Just look at his work on third downs; it’s not all on him, but his numbers aren’t good here: 7-of-19 passing; 3.1 yards per pass attempt. He’s facing more pressure in those situations.

Griffin said he felt better with his technique in the 38-20 loss to the Packers. He can still improve his overall anticipation and timing on routes, though some of that stems from the receivers getting back in sync with him, too. At times he's throwing the ball as the receiver already is coming out of his break, allowing the defensive back to drive on the ball and break it up. That's a timing built on repetition with the receivers.

“I feel like, just as a group, we’ve all been off a little bit,” Griffin said. “We’ll figure that out and we’ll get it going. We’ve been hitting in practice, in the games at times we are hitting, so I don’t think it’s necessarily a problem. It’s showing up, especially on third down, we just have got to execute better, and we will.”

Re: How Long Should They Play Griffin Without Improvement?

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 3:31 pm
by riggofan
GFlanagan3 wrote:
OldSchool wrote:How many games do the rest of you think the Skins should give Griffin before making a change?
ok....why not run Rexy out there? or re-sign White? let's go in COMPLETE panic mode shall we? ...just wow. He will get it together and soon. Do you REALLY think RGIII is happy with his performance? This man is a warrior let him fight.


+1. What this guy said.

Posted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 4:15 pm
by StorminMormon86
riggofan wrote:I'm just not buying that Kirk Cousins was going to be the difference maker against the Packers last weekend.

I don't disagree with this at all, but you can't tell me that we wouldn't have had a better shot at winning with the Kirkster against the Eagles in week 1.