Page 1 of 4

Incompleteness of roster remodeling explains 3-6 record

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:51 pm
by 1niksder
Redskins have some pieces that fit, some that don’t


Mike Shanahan told it to everyone who would listen after he became the Washington Redskins‘ coach in January 2010. Returning the franchise to respectability would not happen overnight, he said. Those words have appeared in every local newspaper and on every local airwave many times since.
And while Shanahan avoided using the word “rebuilding,” the obvious age and lack of talent on the Redskins roster crystallized the magnitude of Shanahan’s task. It required more than just some fresh paint and pretty pictures to hang on the wall. No, Shanahan needed a bulldozer and sledgehammer for a full-scale demolition and remodeling.
Fast-forward 34 months, though, and the project remains far from complete. The Redskins reached their bye this week with a record of 3-6, the same mark as this point last season. Shanahan used “overnight” as a figure of speech, but with a 14-27 record as Redskins coach and another December of irrelevance ahead, it’s fair to wonder when the sun is supposed to come up.
“We started over again — offense, defense,” Shanahan said. “We’ve tried to do it through the draft and free agency, get a lot younger, get the right players, and I see some tremendous strides. Hopefully, it’s not only me. Hopefully, it’s Dan, as well.”

Shanahan, of course, referred to Redskins owner Daniel Snyder. It was an unusual occurrence Monday, but these are dire times. Shanahan’s vision for this season has not become reality, and, as the one who has assembled the roster, any scrutiny ascends the organizational hierarchy to Shanahan’s perch.

He drafted Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback Robert Griffin III in April, trading three first round draft picks and a second-rounder to do so. He expected to add Griffin to an offense retooled in the offseason with young playmakers and a defense he believed was capable of finishing among the top five in the NFL a year after he overhauled it.
A mix of injuries and underachievement on defense, though, has outweighed — at least in the standings — Griffin’s promising rookie season. Instead of a strong defense helping a struggling rookie quarterback, the reverse has been true. The Redskins‘ offense ranks fifth in the NFL in yards per play, while the defense ranks 29th.
Shanahan attributes the defensive breakdowns to injuries.
“It’s not what we were a year ago,” he said. “But these guys are gaining some experience. I think we’ve got a chance to get a couple guys back, and some of the other guys that have been playing, I think are getting better. So it gives you a chance.”
The Redskins lost two-time Pro Bowl outside linebacker Brian Orakpo (torn pectoral muscle) and starting left defensive end Adam Carriker (torn quadriceps tendon) for the season in Week 2. First-string strong safety Brandon Meriweather, who signed as a free agent in March, has not played because he sprained his left knee in the second preseason game and then reinjured it during a freak pregame collision in Week 4.
Amid the injuries, other front-line defensive players, ones Shanahan acquired, are not performing at the level they did in 2011.
Outside linebacker Ryan Kerrigan has only one sack in the past five games, and that was of a Pittsburgh Steelers receiver attempting to throw on a trick play.


Click link for the rest

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:47 pm
by DarthMonk
How young are we?

How many starters (or guys who project to play a LOT) are 27 or younger?

I count about 22:

Forbath
Garcon
Gettis
Griffin III
Hankerson
Jenkins
Kerrigan
LeRibeus
Lichtensteiger
Morgan
Morris
Paul
Paulsen
Polumbus
Riley
Robinsin, A
Robinson, K
Royster
Williams, K
Williams, T
Wison, J
Young

I may have missed 1 or 2 or included 1 or 2 I shouldn't have but this is more than I thought. I think what these guys do in the next season and a half will tell the tale. If most of them pan out, Shanny will have succeeded. If half of them don't we are likely to wallow.

DarthMonk

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:50 am
by SkinsJock
there's no doubt that anyone with a plan can be successful in the NFL

Mike can do it either as the 'manager' or as HC ....... given time

HOWEVER

this is the NFL and you are not allowed a lot of time to make it ...

with RG3 - your 'credibility' goes way up



going to be an interesting few weeks here :lol:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:47 am
by 1niksder
DarthMonk wrote:How young are we?

How many starters (or guys who project to play a LOT) are 27 or younger?

I count about 22:

Forbath
Garcon
Gettis
Griffin III
Hankerson
Jenkins
Kerrigan
LeRibeus
Lichtensteiger
Morgan
Morris
Paul
Paulsen
Polumbus
Riley
Robinsin, A
Robinson, K
Royster
Williams, K
Williams, T
Wison, J
Young

I may have missed 1 or 2 or included 1 or 2 I shouldn't have but this is more than I thought. I think what these guys do in the next season and a half will tell the tale. If most of them pan out, Shanny will have succeeded. If half of them don't we are likely to wallow.

DarthMonk


If you're talking about the next season and a half than you can add...

Orakpo, Davis, Rob Jackson, Gomes, Bernstine, Jordan, Compton, Minnifield, Darius Hanks, Chris Baker, and Sundberg.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:10 am
by DaSkinz Baby
Sorry I don't agree this team and 97% of the players that Shanahan has brought in, you know "his guys" lack heart, determination. Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year. The Colts have two things we don't. 1 a better coaching staff even with their HC out!! and 2 players with heart, dedication and a strong desire to succeed. Washington with Snyder is a club, you come here make millions swear your going to fight your guts out, get better and every year come in last in the division. The excuses pretty much are the same, not enough skill players, injuries and now finally this Cap hell..............

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:19 am
by Deadskins
DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.

Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:30 am
by DaSkinz Baby
Deadskins wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.

Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.


Dude how many players over their last 5 seasons are still there with Indy? Pretty much the only person left of any real value is Reggie Wayne. All others GONE!! The only thing ludicrous is the consistent excuses fans allow this organization to get away with. The Giants last year had a COMPLETELY DESTROYED SECONDARY and many others hurt 80% of the season. But they won the Super Bowl. You know why? Because they don't deal with excuses......We should take that as a lesson if nothing else.......

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:31 am
by SkinsJock
Sorry DaSkinz - you seem to be missing the point that some here are making - the roster make-up still needs work from the mess that was created by Snyder

I'd agree that there are 'excuses' for the 3-6 record but there are also valid reasons

your low opinion of this coaching staff is one thing but I'd disagree that our 3-6 record is mostly because of the coaches

the Colts roster was 'assembled' over time by guys (Bill Polian) that knew what they were doing


actually - adding Andrew Luck caused some players like Wayne to stay because they could see the possibilities

I prefer RG3 - I think we'll be more exciting


IMO there is NO WAY that the Colts coaching staff could have done near as well as these guys have done and i'm not a fan of the Shanahans and Haslett

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:35 am
by DaSkinz Baby
SkinsJock wrote:Sorry DaSkinz - you seem to be missing the point that some here are making - the roster make-up still needs work from the mess that was created by Snyder

I'd agree that there are 'excuses' for the 3-6 record but there are also valid reasons

your low opinion of this coaching staff is one thing but I'd disagree that our 3-6 record is mostly because of the coaches

the Colts roster was 'assembled' over time by guys (Bill Polian) that knew what they were doing


actually - adding Andrew Luck caused some players like Wayne to stay because they could see the possibilities

I prefer RG3 - I think we'll be more exciting


IMO there is NO WAY that the Colts coaching staff could have done near as well as these guys have done and i'm not a fan of the Shanahans and Haslett


So the exit polls here show that this roster was so bad that it is taking Shanahan 4 years to assemble a good team? Nevermind the retarded thinking of the coaches to bring in safeties that no other team wanted, let core Redskins go (Rogers) where he leaves to have a pro bowl season to continue with players such as Josh Wilson, MeAngelo Hall?? Sorry this IMHO makes the coaching staff look even more stupid. No wonder we are having RG3 go out on pass patterns to get destroyed.......... :shock:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:55 am
by Deadskins
DaSkinz Baby wrote:The Giants last year had a COMPLETELY DESTROYED SECONDARY and many others hurt 80% of the season.

But they still had a pass rush, which masks deficiencies at the DB positions. Also, what was their record when those injured players were gone? They got healthy just in time to win three of their final four games (after a four game skid), taking them to a whopping 9-7 record. :roll:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:14 am
by markshark84
DaSkinz Baby wrote:Sorry I don't agree this team and 97% of the players that Shanahan has brought in, you know "his guys" lack heart, determination. Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year. The Colts have two things we don't. 1 a better coaching staff even with their HC out!! and 2 players with heart, dedication and a strong desire to succeed. Washington with Snyder is a club, you come here make millions swear your going to fight your guts out, get better and every year come in last in the division. The excuses pretty much are the same, not enough skill players, injuries and now finally this Cap hell..............


Seriously? You are talking about the Colts again? Come on. Get over it. Why don't you bring up the STL 1999 team too?

The Colts have improved, but their schedule is CRAZY :shock: easy. They have played the Jets, Browns, TENN, Jacksonville, and Miami in their last 5 games. Those teams have a combined record of 12-30!!!!!! Meanwhile, in our past 5 games we have played 4 teams with winning records and for a combined opponent win total of 26-16.

Your infatuation needs to end. Get over it. You aren't comparing apples to apples. I am not a homer to say the least. I am confident 100% of the people on this board would agree. That said, if we had the Colts schedule, we would have a similar record.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:55 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
BOM!
Roasted.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:20 pm
by riggofan
Seriously this dude's Colts argument has been shot down by pretty much everyone on this board. Completely weak and ignorant.

The Colts had one of the best franchise QBs ever on their roster for 14 years. During that time while we were trading away our draft picks for Brad Johnson and Donovan McNabb, spending first rounders on Jason Campbell and Patrick Ramsey, the Colts had the luxury of keeping their picks and spending high picks on quality players and depth.

I'm sure there were some other sub .500 teams in the league last year. Why don't you break down comparisons for us of the Redskins vs. say the Jaguars? Bills? Chiefs? Browns? Maybe a couple other teams that didn't have Peyton Manning on their roster for the past 14 years.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:55 pm
by Irn-Bru
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:BOM!
Roasted.


I've always wondered, ckRGiii: when you write that out, in your head do you pronounce it "Bohm" or "Boom"? :)

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:09 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Irn-Bru wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:BOM!
Roasted.


I've always wondered, ckRGiii: when you write that out, in your head do you pronounce it "Bohm" or "Boom"? :)


:lol:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:26 pm
by Deadskins
Irn-Bru wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:BOM!
Roasted.


I've always wondered, ckRGiii: when you write that out, in your head do you pronounce it "Bohm" or "Boom"? :)

Brother Of Mine.

Bohm.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:19 pm
by DaSkinz Baby
These excuses everyone gives is about as solid as Doo Doo Butter. The fact remains 3 years we still lose to teams we should beat and every other team get's good quick.........FACTS and everyone loves to dispute but you can dispute all you want but you won't dispute 3-6 our current record and you won't dispute we won't win 2 more games this year.................

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 3:52 pm
by langleyparkjoe
DaSkinz Baby wrote:These excuses everyone gives is about as solid as Doo Doo Butter. The fact remains 3 years we still lose to teams we should beat and every other team get's good quick.........FACTS and everyone loves to dispute but you can dispute all you want but you won't dispute 3-6 our current record and you won't dispute we won't win 2 more games this year.................


Well.. there's the Jaguars :lol:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 4:13 pm
by riggofan
DaSkinz Baby wrote:These excuses everyone gives is about as solid as Doo Doo Butter. The fact remains 3 years we still lose to teams we should beat and every other team get's good quick.........FACTS and everyone loves to dispute but you can dispute all you want but you won't dispute 3-6 our current record and you won't dispute we won't win 2 more games this year.................


How is it a "fact" that we lose to teams who should beat? Maybe you need to look up the definition of what a FACT is. Its not a FACT that we should beat ANY team. Its an OPINION, doofus.

I don't see anybody on here making excuses for the Skins. All I see is people calling you out on your BS comparison to the Colts.

And I will be happy to dispute you on whether the Skins will win two more games this year or not. Yeah, I'll take that bet. I'll bet that we win at least two of our five remaining divisional games.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:55 pm
by chiefhog44
DaSkinz Baby wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:Sorry DaSkinz - you seem to be missing the point that some here are making - the roster make-up still needs work from the mess that was created by Snyder

I'd agree that there are 'excuses' for the 3-6 record but there are also valid reasons

your low opinion of this coaching staff is one thing but I'd disagree that our 3-6 record is mostly because of the coaches

the Colts roster was 'assembled' over time by guys (Bill Polian) that knew what they were doing


actually - adding Andrew Luck caused some players like Wayne to stay because they could see the possibilities

I prefer RG3 - I think we'll be more exciting


IMO there is NO WAY that the Colts coaching staff could have done near as well as these guys have done and i'm not a fan of the Shanahans and Haslett


So the exit polls here show that this roster was so bad that it is taking Shanahan 4 years to assemble a good team? Nevermind the retarded thinking of the coaches to bring in safeties that no other team wanted, let core Redskins go (Rogers) where he leaves to have a pro bowl season to continue with players such as Josh Wilson, MeAngelo Hall?? Sorry this IMHO makes the coaching staff look even more stupid. No wonder we are having RG3 go out on pass patterns to get destroyed.......... :shock:


Here's a question for you... how many starters have the Colts acquired this year? The answer is 11, almost all on offense. The other 13 were all aquired by Colts at least 3 years ago I believe. How do you read that stat? I guess I read that as the neulcleus of this defense has been playing together for some time. But you could also read that a different way as well.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:31 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Deadskins wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:BOM!
Roasted.


I've always wondered, ckRGiii: when you write that out, in your head do you pronounce it "Bohm" or "Boom"? :)

Brother Of Mine.

Bohm.


Lol,
Or is it bome?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:05 pm
by TimSkin
DaSkinz Baby wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.

Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.


Dude how many players over their last 5 seasons are still there with Indy? Pretty much the only person left of any real value is Reggie Wayne. All others GONE!! The only thing ludicrous is the consistent excuses fans allow this organization to get away with. The Giants last year had a COMPLETELY DESTROYED SECONDARY and many others hurt 80% of the season. But they won the Super Bowl. You know why? Because they don't deal with excuses......We should take that as a lesson if nothing else.......


Dude that's just dumb.....maybe you forgot the Colts have arguably the best pass rusher in the NFL....Dwight Freeney

They got Mathis, Angerer, Vontae Davis(hasn't been there the past 5 yrs but is a starter anywhere he goes and who the skins should've gone after) Antoine Bathea, Corey Redding, Donald Brown, Donnie Avery(who lit it up with the Rams) they also have Vinateri and McAfee so I would say that the Colts weren't really rebuilding but just had a really crappy QB carousel last year and a bunch of injuries and one of the EASIEST scheudules in the history of the NFL.

Also Josh Wilson, MeAngelo, Magoo, and Reed would've been sucessful in the Giants secondary last year with the pass rush they had.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:56 pm
by Red_One43
^ Responding to all of the above^
Pat Angerer missed first 5 games of the season andhas been hobbled when playing.
Robert Mathis has missed 3 games this season
Dwight Freeney has missed 2 games and only has 2 sacks on the season. He is slowed by a an ankle injury.

Colts CB Vontae Davis (knee) has been ruled out for Week 10.Davis has appeared in two games since Week 3, playing start to finish in just one of those contests. He's out indefinitely with no timetable to return.


Colts LE Cory Redding (knee) has been ruled out for Week 7 against the Browns.The Indy defense is severely banged up. Also ruled out are DTs Fili Moala (knee) and Martin Tevaseu (ankle), OLB Robert Mathis (knee), and CB Darius Butler (shoulder). Inside linebacker Pat Angerer (foot) is listed as questionable. Trent Richardson could have a field day against the league's No. 29 rush defense


Of the five guys TimSkin mentioned, 4 have missed games and Freeney is not having a Freeney season because he is a linebacker this year. Look at the last quote. "Indy D is severely banged up." Yet they still perform good enough to win.

AND Get this - the Colts are transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4. According to Haz, it takes 3 years to reach respectability. The Colts, by no means a good defense, have at least played well enough to let the offense win some games.

Talk about their soft schedule all you guys want, they still only gave up 327 yards to the Vikes ( a common opponent) while the Skins gave up 421 to the Vikes.

Talk about their inspired play for their coach? Well that is definitely an indictment againt Shanny and Haz because you are saying that the Skins D cannot get inpired by their coaches and the fact that they now have an offense.

I disagree with that indictment. The Skins D has been playing its hearts out, but when you are playing hard in a scheme that does not fit your talent level, it becomes evident that your effort are futile.

Colts 6-3!

Yes, the comparison is relevant!

Now, even Darrell Green and Charles Mann have joined in to say that it isn't just about the talent. This is a coaching issue. A misuse of the talent on this team by a coaching staff hell bent on fitting players to a scheme.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:31 am
by Deadskins
Red_One43 wrote:Talk about their inspired play for their coach? Well that is definitely an indictment againt Shanny and Haz because you are saying that the Skins D cannot get inpired by their coaches and the fact that they now have an offense.

:roll: If you can't see the difference, then you are blind.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 6:40 am
by RayNAustin
Deadskins wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.

Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.


That's just not true at all ... the Colts CLEANED HOUSE at the end of last season ... players, coaches, and the front office! They did everything but take the horseshoe off their helmets ... and all the analysts were in agreement about how much better a situation RG3 was going to have with the Redskins, than Luck was going to have with the Colts who were just beginning a full scale rebuild this year.