The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Speak from your heart
Speak from your conscience
Speak from your soul

Barack or Mitt.....???

Can't we get a none of the above option?

Deadskins wrote:Can't we get a none of the above option?

i voted for obama cuz voltron wasn't listed.

Who's Mara backing....?

I'll go against that.

Unless that means Romney of course...

Plus O'Bama is Irish.

DANG.... I want to revise but it will NOT let me. MODs, help me out here.

I would include:

Voltron
Ron Paul
Pokemon
Donkey Kong
.........NONE OF THE ABOVE

tribeofjudah wrote:Voltron

Honestly, that's the only one you need to add my brutha!!!

Not even Americans could elect somebody who calls himself Mitt, could they? He would be the first US president that European leaders haven't tripped over themselves to meet first......

I wonder why this is even a poll. No matter who wins the election, Obama will still be president come November 2012.

Irn-Bru wrote:I wonder why this is even a poll. No matter who wins the election, Obama will still be president come November 2012.

Or maybe Biden.

Irn-Bru wrote:I wonder why this is even a poll. No matter who wins the election, Obama will still be president come November 2012.

I knew I liked you. I was thinking that same smart ass thing.

16 Trillion in debt, we all lose. I don't vote.

Irn-Bru wrote:I wonder why this is even a poll. No matter who wins the election, Obama will still be president come November 2012.

ok smarty pants.....I got it. So I phrased it wrong, what do you want? A cookie

THEY ARE ALL CROOKS. I'll take the lesser evil.....

UK Skins Fan wrote:Not even Americans could elect somebody who calls himself Mitt, could they? He would be the first US president that European leaders haven't tripped over themselves to meet first......

That, alone is a major selling point.

Beyond that, they elected a man with no experience, no particular vision, and no plan in 2008... Why not Mitt?

^^^^^^

and who may "secretly" be Muslim. Nothing wrong with your choice of faith, but just come clean and be true to yourself and your convictions.


Regardless, I view politicians as CROOKS........ who is the lesser "eviL" of the 2...?

tribeofjudah wrote:^^^^^^

and who may "secretly" be Muslim. Nothing wrong with your choice of faith, but just come clean and be true to yourself and your convictions.


Regardless, I view politicians as CROOKS........ who is the lesser "eviL" of the 2...?

You should stop bad mouthing crooks... most crooks had reasons for the change in their morals... and most politicians can recall ever having morals.


What we need is a politician that will openly run as a crook

An A-hole.

Countertrey wrote:

UK Skins Fan wrote:Not even Americans could elect somebody who calls himself Mitt, could they? He would be the first US president that European leaders haven't tripped over themselves to meet first......

That, alone is a major selling point.

Beyond that, they elected a man with no experience, no particular vision, and no plan in 2008... Why not Mitt?

Actually, you've hit the nail on the head there, with regard to politicians on both sides of the Atlantic. I listen to what they say (or the parts that are broadcast and printed), I watch them, I digest the message. And after all that, the most positive thing I can find to say is "Why not?". No enthusiasm for any of them.

My point wasn't a serious one: after four years of getting used to the "leader of the free world" being called Barack, you seriously want me to get used to somebody named after fingerless gloves?

ATX_Skins wrote:16 Trillion in debt, we all lose. I don't vote.

That'll show 'em.

Countertrey wrote:

UK Skins Fan wrote:Not even Americans could elect somebody who calls himself Mitt, could they? He would be the first US president that European leaders haven't tripped over themselves to meet first......

That, alone is a major selling point.

Beyond that, they elected a man with no experience, no particular vision, and no plan in 2008... Why not Mitt?

'Cause Mitt's a silver spoon crook. I'd rather a self made man everyday of the week.

emoses14 wrote:

ATX_Skins wrote:16 Trillion in debt, we all lose. I don't vote.

That'll show 'em.

I'm with ATX Skins.

For me, it's not about "showing them." It's about not consenting to a broken system.

tribeofjudah wrote:

Irn-Bru wrote:I wonder why this is even a poll. No matter who wins the election, Obama will still be president come November 2012.

ok smarty pants.....I got it. So I phrased it wrong, what do you want? A cookie

Think about it this way, there will always be "that guy" in the thread. If I didn't do it, chances are JSPB or emoses would have.

emoses14 wrote:

Countertrey wrote:

UK Skins Fan wrote:Not even Americans could elect somebody who calls himself Mitt, could they? He would be the first US president that European leaders haven't tripped over themselves to meet first......

That, alone is a major selling point.

Beyond that, they elected a man with no experience, no particular vision, and no plan in 2008... Why not Mitt?

'Cause Mitt's a silver spoon crook. I'd rather a self made man everyday of the week.

Did you actually read what you wrote?

Deadskins wrote:Can't we get a none of the above option?

That would make more sense if the question is who you want to win

Irn-Bru wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

ATX_Skins wrote:16 Trillion in debt, we all lose. I don't vote.

That'll show 'em.

I'm with ATX Skins.

For me, it's not about "showing them." It's about not consenting to a broken system.

Call me UN-patriotic, but the last time I voted was for that: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" guy....!!! HAHAHAHA.... I was young and dumb and full of.........______?

I see it this way: I don't vote cuz Almighty GOD will always place in "power" who HE wants there......as HE deems fit. He raises Kings, and bring them down........!!!