The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

The Redskins will endure a seven-game stretch in which they face the Steelers, Panthers, Eagles, Cowboys, Ravens, and Giants (twice).

Yeah, well we beat the G-strings twice last year, and with better QB play would have had the Cowpies both times too. I also see us beating the Panthers, and staying with the other three teams in games that could go either way.

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

I'm not surprised by the predictions. Most analysts will continue to predict losing seasons until after we start having winning ones.

Irn-Bru wrote:

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

I'm not surprised by the predictions. Most analysts will continue to predict losing seasons until after we start having winning ones.

Understandable Bru but cooooooome on man, three games???

STL would love that.

frankcal20 wrote:STL would love that.

+1

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

Yeah, they were silly. They flew through our schedule and Indy's. When doing Indy they kept looking back at division picks when they hit a rematch and kept saying "let's give 'em a split." When they did us every division game was a loss.

Knowing us we'll sweep all the playoff teams and lose to the bottom feeders.

Maybe things are about to get different.

DarthMonk

why are you upset? The Redskins have averaged 5 wins per SEASON over the past three seasons, they lost 10 of their last 12 games to end last year and they've been in last place 4 straight seasons and 5 out of the past 6.

The redskins simply dont count. they are an after thought for every national commentator because the above FACTS.

What...you're upset that they didnt say 6 wins, for example, instead of 3? Who cares. There's bigger issues in the world.

the poster wrote:why are you upset? The Redskins have averaged 5 wins per SEASON over the past three seasons, they lost 10 of their last 12 games to end last year and they've been in last place 4 straight seasons and 5 out of the past 6.

The redskins simply dont count. they are an after thought for every national commentator because the above FACTS.

What...you're upset that they didnt say 6 wins, for example, instead of 3? Who cares. There's bigger issues in the world.

JUST SAY WHAT YOU REALLY MEAN!!!!!!!!!!

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

MANE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER IS NOT TO GET YOUR HINNY HAIR WOUND TO TIGHT

LORD GIBBS wrote:

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

MANE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER IS NOT TO GET YOUR HINNY HAIR WOUND TO TIGHT

you guys don't have spellcheck on your forum, do you?

the poster wrote:

LORD GIBBS wrote:

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

MANE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER IS NOT TO GET YOUR HINNY HAIR WOUND TO TIGHT

you guys don't have spellcheck on your forum, do you?

Don't worry about it you're safe considering no one reads your post...

Oh wait that was your reply

the poster wrote:

LORD GIBBS wrote:

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

MANE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER IS NOT TO GET YOUR HINNY HAIR WOUND TO TIGHT

you guys don't have spellcheck on your forum, do you?

PSA:
If you're going to be that guy, then you probably should make sure your post is completely correct.

There are no misspellings in Lord Gibbs' post, just some incorrect usage and grammar issues.

Mane=hair that grows down the back of the head and neck of some animals; wrong word, properly spelled.
Hinny=actually an equine hybrid of a male horse and female donkey (I know, who knew?); that one actually works if in fact Tribe has such an animal.
Too=/=to: that's just a commonly confused word, but, again, not actually a misspelling.

You're welcome.

the poster wrote:why are you upset? The Redskins have averaged 5 wins per SEASON over the past three seasons, they lost 10 of their last 12 games to end last year and they've been in last place 4 straight seasons and 5 out of the past 6.

The redskins simply dont count. they are an after thought for every national commentator because the above FACTS.

What...you're upset that they didnt say 6 wins, for example, instead of 3? Who cares. There's bigger issues in the world.

how about this.............BOOO ON YOU...!!!

the poster wrote:why are you upset? The Redskins have averaged 5 wins per SEASON over the past three seasons, they lost 10 of their last 12 games to end last year and they've been in last place 4 straight seasons and 5 out of the past 6.

The redskins simply dont count. they are an after thought for every national commentator because the above FACTS.

What...you're upset that they didnt say 6 wins, for example, instead of 3? Who cares. There's bigger issues in the world.

I make mistakes in my posts. So do you so I'd think twice about calling out spelling errors. Just for kicks with corrections in yellow:

the poster wrote:(Most sentences start with capital letters.) ---> why are you upset? The Redskins have averaged 5 wins per SEASON over the past three seasons, they lost 10 of their last 12 games to end last year and they've been in last place 4 straight seasons and 5 out of the past 6.

The (This proper noun should be capitalized.) ---> redskins simply (Don't is a contraction requiring an apostrophe.) ---> dont count. (You're missing a capital letter again.) ---> they are an (Afterthought is one word.) ---> after thought for every national commentator because the above FACTS.

What...you're upset that they (Didn't is a contraction requiring an apostrophe.) ---> didnt say 6 wins, for example, instead of 3? Who cares. <--- (This question requires a question mark.) (This should be "There are" not a contraction for "There is.") ---> There's bigger issues in the world.

As you say, there's bigger issues. Have you figured out why ey didn't cost a 2nd and a 3rd yet?

DarthMonk

the poster wrote:why are you upset? The Redskins have averaged 5 wins per SEASON over the past three seasons, they lost 10 of their last 12 games to end last year and they've been in last place 4 straight seasons and 5 out of the past 6.

The redskins simply dont count. they are an after thought for every national commentator because the above FACTS.

What...you're upset that they didnt say 6 wins, for example, instead of 3? Who cares. There's bigger issues in the world.

Don't you have anything better to do than go on a Redskins fan site?

You must be allowed to leave the basement once in awhile...

emoses14 wrote:

the poster wrote:

LORD GIBBS wrote:

tribeofjudah wrote:These two are usually pretty sharp with their comments and predictions.

Both of them are "temporary" BUMS for predicting that the Skins will win .....only 3 games....????

Are you kidding me? RG3 (Grossman) won 5 games last year. NOW we get the real deal RGIII.

Mooch and Warner, enough with the INSULTS....!!! Redeem yourselves...!!!

MANE THING YOU NEED TO REMEMBER IS NOT TO GET YOUR HINNY HAIR WOUND TO TIGHT

you guys don't have spellcheck on your forum, do you?

PSA:
If you're going to be that guy, then you probably should make sure your post is completely correct.

There are no misspellings in Lord Gibbs' post, just some incorrect usage and grammar issues.

Mane=hair that grows down the back of the head and neck of some animals; wrong word, properly spelled.
Hinny=actually an equine hybrid of a male horse and female donkey (I know, who knew?); that one actually works if in fact Tribe has such an animal.
Too=/=to: that's just a commonly confused word, but, again, not actually a misspelling.

You're welcome.

Classic! I remember that "The More You Know" jingle that used to come on at the end of learning programs in the 80s.

DarthMonk wrote:Have you figured out why ey didn't cost a 2nd and a 3rd yet?

DarthMonk

I'm guessing he thinks we gave up 4 first round picks + a 2nd to acquire RGIII, too.

As you say, there's bigger issues. Have you figured out why ey didn't cost a 2nd and a 3rd yet?

DarthMonk

has your team gotten out of last place yet?

I'm travelling today and out of the office, could someone look up the standings for the entire NFL right now and let me know what place EACH AND EVERY TEAM IS IN?

My recollection is that everyone is in first at this point.

emoses, check your PMs.

I'll get mad when we win 9+ in consecutive seasons.

Deadskins wrote:emoses, check your PMs.

Sorry, Deadskins. I noticed I had one after the fact. Got it.

the poster wrote:

As you say, there's bigger issues. Have you figured out why ey didn't cost a 2nd and a 3rd yet?

DarthMonk

has your team gotten out of last place yet?

The last bastion of the pwnd.

We'll worry about the Redskins; you worry about how you've lost every argument you've entered into on the board.