Drafting a RB....?
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:53 pm
If Chris Polk is lingering around in the third round, do we scoop him up? He seems like a perfect fit for the scheme.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
That would be our first pick after QB, right? I say OL before RB.Chris Luva Luva wrote:If Chris Polk is lingering around in the third round, do we scoop him up? He seems like a perfect fit for the scheme.
In the third round I think you gotta go for one one you project to play a position that's not your highest priority over sit on the bench at a position of need.Countertrey wrote:With our relative wealth at RB... it is a luxury that we cannot afford. We need OL... We need DB... We need ILB...
That seems about right. I think this kinda starts in round 4 though. Early in round 3 a team like us should procure a starter.KazooSkinsFan wrote:In the third round I think you gotta go for one one you project to play a position that's not your highest priority over sit on the bench at a position of need.Countertrey wrote:With our relative wealth at RB... it is a luxury that we cannot afford. We need OL... We need DB... We need ILB...
I saw what Toby Gerhart did for the Vikings when Adrian Peterson went down, what Ben Tate did for the Texans when Arian Foster went down, and what Calil Bell did for the Bears when Matt Forte went down.Chris Luva Luva wrote:It's been said that while we have some good backs, none are "feature" backs...
Do you feel that we need a "feature" back? And if Polk was available, in which round would u take him? If you haven't, watch his highlights. He reminds me of Ray Rice.
If he's there in the 4th round, I'd take him.
Also, from another thread:DarthMonk wrote:I saw what Toby Gerhart did for the Vikings when Adrian Peterson went down, what Ben Tate did for the Texans when Arian Foster went down, and what Calil Bell did for the Bears when Matt Forte went down.Chris Luva Luva wrote:It's been said that while we have some good backs, none are "feature" backs...
Do you feel that we need a "feature" back? And if Polk was available, in which round would u take him? If you haven't, watch his highlights. He reminds me of Ray Rice.
If he's there in the 4th round, I'd take him.
I'm gonna call Roy Helu a feature back. He's big, fast. strong, catches well, runs after the catch well, can pick up a blitz, and really knows when to cut it upfield. He's real good.
DarthMonk
DarthMonk wrote:Also, according to ESPN.com, Helu had one more catch than LeSean McCoy, more receiveing yards (379-315), more ypc (7.7-6.6), and more yac (432-409).
Who knew?![]()
DarthMonk
Don't be shocked folks... Don't read too far into my projection that we'll draft other than that he fits the system. Just because we have good backs already doesn't mean we can't use another, or that Mike doesn't think that this guy could be special. Time will tell.Keep an eye on Washington RB Chris Polk, for the #Redskins. Was a @seniorbowl, but 2nd at Wash in career rush ydg. Not an opinion.
Don't be shocked folks... Don't read too far into my projection that we'll draft other than that he fits the system. Just because we have good backs already doesn't mean we can't use another, or that Mike doesn't think that this guy could be special. Time will tell.Keep an eye on Washington RB Chris Polk, for the #Redskins. Was a @seniorbowl, but 2nd at Wash in career rush ydg. Not an opinion.
I don't even disagree, but for some reason I think they're eyeballing him.Countertrey wrote:I still think they go one of the 3 positions of need... but he does run with a chip.
I agree with you in that if you see a player in the third you think is a gamer you take him regardless of the position. But why do you think Shannahan sees it with Polk but other teams don't? I know you're saying system, and that explains some teams but not all of them.Chris Luva Luva wrote:I still think they'll get Polk today, time will tell though. He's the perfect fit for this system.
Some people are saying that there's a steep drop off in O-linemen after the 1st round and that U can get your money's worth in the 4th. If Polk is there in the 3rd, he's ours.
Are those choices mutually exclusive? Just asking...cowboykillerzRED wrote:I'm secretly hoping we add the other j Jenkins to the squad... Am I drunk?
The choices were that we get jj or that you were drunk. I was just joking...cowboykillerzRED wrote:What are the choices? Add jj despite his 4kids w 3 different baby's mommas and is the Irishman drunk? Hardly a choice to consider much at all- for one of the above
I'm sure they do. I'm just saying that if he's there, I think we'll snag him.KazooSkinsFan wrote:I agree with you in that if you see a player in the third you think is a gamer you take him regardless of the position. But why do you think Shannahan sees it with Polk but other teams don't? I know you're saying system, and that explains some teams but not all of them.