The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

This makes me feel really good about getting Manning.


http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/76407 ... ource-says

Sorry, I only meant to have 7 throw up dudes not 9

Yeah, 9 was just ridiculous.

There is no "if we can't" ..... we HAVE to get him!

If no RG3, then we'd have to go Tannenhill. Problem is, several "analysts"--lead by Mayock have proclaimed their belief that Tannenhill is worthy of a Top 12 pick.

The plot will thicken. I just don't think Peyton wants to come here. But, I could see Mike making a push. Mike seems savvy enough to sell Snyder on the idea, then if it doesn't work out---claim that it's because Manning wasn't healthy. Easy way for him to save face for him and his kid.

It might be fun for a year, but I just can't seem to get excited about Peyton Manning. Healthy or not. Its a short term fix in the best scenario and hard to imagine it working out well either way.

Shanny and Allen have done a good job since they got serious about re-building. I hope they see a QB like in the draft and continue down that path.

If we don't get RG3....

SEXY REXY BABYYYYYY!!!!!!

He's not fast, he's not flashy.. he's SEXY REXY!!!

langleyparkjoe wrote:If we don't get RG3....

SEXY REXY BABYYYYYY!!!!!!

He's not fast, he's not flashy.. he's SEXY REXY!!!

LMAO.

Does anyone else think Russell Wilson will be a good QB option for the Redskins? IMO, he should be considered if the cost of G3 is to much.

riggofan wrote:It might be fun for a year, but I just can't seem to get excited about Peyton Manning. Healthy or not. Its a short term fix in the best scenario and hard to imagine it working out well either way.

Shanny and Allen have done a good job since they got serious about re-building. I hope they see a QB like in the draft and continue down that path.

Exactly and more than likely he would get punished in the NFC East.

SKINS#1 wrote:Does anyone else think Russell Wilson will be a good QB option for the Redskins? IMO, he should be considered if the cost of G3 is to much.

I think he's a great QB, has everything going for him but height. I think he's worth taking as a backup initially and then see what happens.

People make a big song and dance about his height but he's like an inch shorter than Drew Brees soneone on here said. I'm sure an offense can be adapted to suit him better as well if you know what I mean.

IMO he's a more solid player than Tannehill. I'm all for RG3 but if we get beaten out of pick #2 than Wilson should be closely looked at.

the cost to get the #2 pick is not a factor

we're going to get RGIII, we have to

the good news is it's not going matter - we're going to make the trade

if it's sexy rexy, then nine throw-up guys would be appropriate...

SkinsJock wrote:the cost to get the #2 pick is not a factor

we're going to get RGIII, we have to

the good news is it's not going matter - we're going to make the trade

Oh good to know we can all stop reading ESPN. Its apparently a done deal and Shanahan has said he will pay any cost.

riggofan wrote:

SkinsJock wrote:the cost to get the #2 pick is not a factor
we're going to get RGIII, we have to
the good news is it's not going matter - we're going to make the trade

Oh good to know we can all stop reading ESPN. Its apparently a done deal and Shanahan has said he will pay any cost.

nobody 'reads' ESPN

The Browns are not going to over-spend to get RGIII - it is going to cost a lot to get the Rams to make the trade but we have to do it

Mike & Bruce will not give up too much ...... but they will make it happen