Page 1 of 1

If you were the Browns what would you do...?

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:53 pm
by SouthLondonRedskin
So most people think that if the Browns want RGIII nobody else can compete because of their two picks in round 1.

But if you were in charge there, is that what you would actually want to do..???

They have so many needs, QB, RB, WR, OL, pretty much the whole offense to be fair, especially if Hillis is to leave, which it looks like he will.

Wouldn't the team make greater strides if they kept their picks and took say Trent Richardson at #4 and Ryan Tannehill at #22...?

They could follow that by adding to the OL and WRs in rounds 2,3, 4 and 5.

Their defense aint too shabby, with that injection of talent they could be competing next season.

I don't know what their cap space is like, maybe they can get some talent in from FA, but if not I can't see how they can give up so much for RGIII.

The point is RGIII will not be cheap, can they actually afford to go for him in terms of lost picks....?

(And yes, I am aware that people could be saying the same about us, however I don't believe we are as bad offensively as them and we should be pretty active in FA, I don't know if they will)

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:02 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Moved to the proper forum.

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:33 pm
by SkinsJock
I would take RGIII if I could - the Browns don't seem to want to give up what it will take
the best indication will be when we all see how hard they go after Flynn


The Rams are hoping the Browns do not get Flynn

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:53 am
by langleyparkjoe
.. move to Los Angeles

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:19 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
I think people are voting no because they don't want the Browns to do this, not because they think they shouldn't.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:49 pm
by SkinsJock
I'd agree - I think the Browns don't want RGIII as badly as we do

They should do whatever's needed but I think that Fisher will bring their best offer to Shanahan and we'll get RGIII

The Browns are going to drive the price up but will not offer as much as Mike is prepared to

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:37 pm
by SouthLondonRedskin
langleyparkjoe wrote:.. move to Los Angeles


Very funny!

ROTFALMAO

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:43 pm
by SouthLondonRedskin
KazooSkinsFan wrote:I think people are voting no because they don't want the Browns to do this, not because they think they shouldn't.


Well that's exactly what I don't want!

The point is if you were in charge at Cleveland what would make sense for them and their interests, not ours!

I'm trying to work out how likely it is that they go for RG3 or if they'll reckon that they need to keep those picks in fact.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:03 pm
by SkinsJock
The Browns want Griffin badly

The Browns will not make a stupid (in their estimation) deal for that pick

The Redskins will make a deal with the Rams - this FO will get the deal done

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:15 pm
by SouthLondonRedskin
SkinsJock wrote:The Browns want Griffin badly

The Browns will not make a stupid (in their estimation) deal for that pick

The Redskins will make a deal with the Rams - this FO will get the deal done


That's a very bold and confident statement! Do you know something we don't...???