Page 1 of 4
Shanahan's Finally Honest About QB Situation
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:16 pm
by The Hogster
Both Mike & Kyle made some pretty honest statements about the Redskins' Quarterback situation. Problem if you will. At least they realize they can't "stake their reputations" on these guys anymore--if they ever did.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/re ... story.html
Published: December 30
Washington Redskins offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan has cast further uncertainty on quarterback Rex Grossman’s future with the team after he said the club remains in need of a franchise quarterback and will try to find one this offseason.
Shanahan — who last week said Grossman needs to eliminate his turnovers to succeed — praised the quarterback’s aggressive nature. But at the same time, Shanahan said he would have no problem going with a new quarterback next season, even if the quarterback has no experience in Shanahan’s offensive system.
“You don’t need a guy that’s experienced with your system,” said Shanahan, who is in his second season with the Redskins after directing the Houston Texans’ offense in 2008 and 2009. “When [Matt] Schaub came into Houston in his first year, he played at a very high level. I don’t think it’s a system that takes a long time to learn. You can get better at it, but everyone in the league runs similar plays.”
Grossman played as a backup for Houston in 2009 and then came to Washington on a one-year deal last season. He ended up unseating Donovan McNabb for the final three games of the season and beat out John Beck for the starting job this season. Grossman has a 5-7 record as a starter this year, but has thrown 19 interceptions to 15 touchdowns and has lost five fumbles.
The Redskins’ offense ranks 16th in the NFL, averaging 334 yards per game, but has mustered only 18.5 points per game (26th) while turning over the ball 34 times (fourth-most).
Despite those shortcomings, Grossman — who was benched five games into the season, but reclaimed his job three weeks later — has said he feels good about his play.
“My confidence level is at an all-time high. I just need to eliminate a couple of bad plays here and there that deter a great performance,” said Grossman, who will be a free agent this offseason. “I’ve done a lot of good things this year. We’ve done a lot of great things this year. Just the consistency level, the percentage of bad plays need to go down. I think you’ve seen that for the most part, as far as production for the last six weeks or so, we’ve been putting up a decent amount of points, moving the ball at a consistent pace.”
The Redskins’ confidence in Grossman doesn’t appear to be quite as high. Both Kyle and his father, head coach Mike Shanahan, have remained noncommittal on the quarterback’s future.
On Friday, Mike Shanahan said he started evaluating college quarterbacks midway through the season. “I’ve already looked at 10 or 15 of them,” he said. “I’ll take half-hour a day, early in the morning. The tapes are made up. I’ll look at maybe 75, 80 plays of just a guy throwing the football in game situations and so that’s most of the passes, or at least the good passes during the season, just so I get a feel for the guy.”
The Redskins passed on the opportunity to draft a quarterback last April. They traded down from No. 10, where Jacksonville ended up taking Blaine Gabbert, to No. 16, where Washington took linebacker Ryan Kerrigan, so they could collect more picks because their needs were so abundant.
In next spring’s draft, the Redskins are expected to use what will be a top-10 pick on a quarterback because the free agent class of quarterbacks is weak. New Orleans is fully expected to re-sign Drew Brees, leaving Alex Smith, Kyle Orton and Jason Campbell as the top free agent options.
Stanford’s Andrew Luck is expected to go first overall in the 2012 draft, but Indianapolis is expected to take him if the Colts land the first pick. Washington currently sits in the seventh spot, but may have to trade up to get the next-best quarterback, which is expected to be Baylor’s Robert Griffin III, if he declares for the draft. Oklahoma’s Landry Jones is projected as the third-best quarterback.
When asked Thursday what kind of quarterback he would prefer, Kyle Shanahan said, “My preference is a quarterback that is going to try to win the game and is smart enough to do that the right way.”
In his weekly remarks to reporters, Kyle Shanahan said Grossman is capable of playing the position the “right way,” and capable of making game-winning plays.
“He’s a smart guy,” Kyle Shanahan said. “I think you can calm him down a little and make him feel like, ‘Hey, you don’t have to try to make all these plays to win the game. We’re in the game. We’ve got a lead. We can run the ball. We can do this. We can do that.’ Then, you don’t have to do as many risky decisions that he has done in the past.”
But at the same time, he acknowledged that the Redskins do not have a top-tier quarterback on their roster.
“Everybody’s looking for a franchise quarterback,” Kyle Shanahan said. “You want one of those guys that there’s no question about. There’s probably only about five or six of them in the league. Then, there’s a lot of guys who can play and a lot of guys who need to be replaced. You’re always trying to find that one and [we’re] still looking to do it.”
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:21 pm
by frankcal20
Like i said in another thread, these statements lead me to believe that they won't go after a 1st round guy. I think they've studied and identified a guy they can develop how they like the QB position to be played.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:25 pm
by The Hogster
frankcal20 wrote:Like i said in another thread, these statements lead me to believe that they won't go after a 1st round guy. I think they've studied and identified a guy they can develop how they like the QB position to be played.
What about the comments make you feel that way? You might be right, but I take this as them finally trying to distance themselves from Beck and Rex. I could see us sliding down to take another QB like Ryan Tannenhill, but keep in mind, with the changes to the CBA and rookie compensation, we are going to see a run on QBs in rounds 1 through 2. As a result, trading into the 2nd round may not be effective for a QB. There are guys who are projected 2nd rounders who will go first round, or very early in the 2nd.
Re: Shanahan's Finally Honest About QB Situation
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:50 pm
by riggofan
The Hogster wrote:Both Mike & Kyle made some pretty honest statements about the Redskins' Quarterback situation. Problem if you will. At least they realize they can't "stake their reputations" on these guys anymore--if they ever did.
No offense - and I'm not addressing you directly Hogster - but I'm so sick of fans and radio people throwing out the "stake my reputation" thing like it was some huge blunder by Shanahan. The guy was a COACH about to start the season with one mediocre QB and one unknown QB at best. Was he *really* supposed to come out and say, "You know I am not 100% sure that these guys can get it done, they're just the best guys we could get right now"?
Seriously, if you were a head coach, is that what you would say to build confidence in your QBs?
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:01 pm
by brad7686
frankcal20 wrote:Like i said in another thread, these statements lead me to believe that they won't go after a 1st round guy. I think they've studied and identified a guy they can develop how they like the QB position to be played.
They could be targeting somebody like Nick Foles in the second if he's there. It's actually a deep qb class. The question is if they take Landry Jones if RGIII is gone. He's got a good arm, mobility and he's pretty accurate at times. Based on last year's tape he'd be a top 5 pick. Just had some injuries around him this year and played inconsistently. It's a question mark. You have to like the zip he gets on the ball though.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:37 pm
by Redskin in Canada
I agree that it does not look as if they will trade up for one of the two top QBs (which is GREAT in my view because they will be too expensive).
I also agree that they will try to get somebody after the 1st round. HOWEVER, if they do that, we would have a QB who is NOT ready to start right away. I do not feel that they wish to bring back Bad Rex to start the 2012 season. They know that if they have another losing season in 2012, they will be out of Washington.
So, I agree that they are looking at a lower pick to draft a QB BUT they are also looking at the possibility to get in FA somebody to start and groom him.
I already
posted in another thread that such player MIGHT be Mark Sanchez if he is put on the trading block by the Jets.
I am going to be rooting for the Jets to lose and not make the playoffs this weekend.

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:13 pm
by aswas71788
Redskin in Canada wrote:I agree that it does not look as if they will trade up for one of the two top QBs (which is GREAT in my view because they will be too expensive).
I also agree that they will try to get somebody after the 1st round. HOWEVER, if they do that, we would have a QB who is NOT ready to start right away. I do not feel that they wish to bring back Bad Rex to start the 2012 season. They know that if they have another losing season in 2012, they will be out of Washington.
So, I agree that they are looking at a lower pick to draft a QB BUT they are also looking at the possibility to get in FA somebody to start and groom him.
I already
posted in another thread that such player MIGHT be Mark Sanchez if he is put on the trading block by the Jets.
I am going to be rooting for the Jets to lose and not make the playoffs this weekend.

The problem with Sanchez is that the Jets will want a first round pick for him, even if they were willing to trade him which I doubt. Sanchez may have been a first round pick but that doesn't make him worth one now. I don't think Ryan will give up on him just yet. Strange, he was last years media darling and this years media flop. How many times have we seens the sophomore drop?
Campbell is not an option. Smith will resign a long term contract with San Francisco after this year so he is out also. There is not another quarterback out there that is any better the Grossman. Leinhart did an reasonable job at Houston until her got hurt but he has never lived up to his promises. He had ample opportunities in Arizona. Therefore, we are left with picking one from the draft. After the first 2, everyone else is project.
Re: Shanahan's Finally Honest About QB Situation
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:16 pm
by SprintRightOption
"On Friday, Mike Shanahan said he started evaluating college quarterbacks midway through the season. “I’ve already looked at 10 or 15 of them,” he said. “I’ll take half-hour a day, early in the morning. The tapes are made up. I’ll look at maybe 75, 80 plays of just a guy throwing the football in game situations and so that’s most of the passes, or at least the good passes during the season, just so I get a feel for the guy.”
Notice it says he looks at the tape of quarterbacks throwing the ball, not running the ball. He could have said how well they move the ball down field.
Re: Shanahan's Finally Honest About QB Situation
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:24 pm
by RayNAustin
riggofan wrote:The Hogster wrote:Both Mike & Kyle made some pretty honest statements about the Redskins' Quarterback situation. Problem if you will. At least they realize they can't "stake their reputations" on these guys anymore--if they ever did.
No offense - and I'm not addressing you directly Hogster - but I'm so sick of fans and radio people throwing out the "stake my reputation" thing like it was some huge blunder by Shanahan. The guy was a COACH about to start the season with one mediocre QB and one unknown QB at best. Was he *really* supposed to come out and say, "You know I am not 100% sure that these guys can get it done, they're just the best guys we could get right now"?
Seriously, if you were a head coach, is that what you would say to build confidence in your QBs?
I would say " We believe our current QBs are both capable guys that can effectively run our offense, and it will be interesting to see who steps up." I would not say "We don't need to draft a QB because I feel John Beck can get the job done, and I'll stake my reputation on that."
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:38 pm
by RayNAustin
frankcal20 wrote:Like i said in another thread, these statements lead me to believe that they won't go after a 1st round guy. I think they've studied and identified a guy they can develop how they like the QB position to be played.
Chief in Austin says "Mike Shanahan may be speaking with forked tongue".
I'd lean toward any statements he makes publicly, at this early juncture, as most likely a diversionary tactic.
Why would he create speculation and a potential bidding war right now by publicly throwing in his hat for one of the top QB prospects? They answer is, Shanahan wouldn't do that. He's a poker player. If anything .... him mentioning the "Three #1s" tells me that they have been evaluating the scenario of Andrew Luck and his costs for quite some time.
In my view, Shanahan is weighing his options right now. He knows now he cannot move forward with any reasonable expectation of significant progress on offense with the QBs he has. He's also smart enough to know that he doesn't have the luxury of making "another" miscalculation or picking a "project" QB. Another poor offensive showing next season using either a "retread" QB or a 2nd round project QB will be a personal setback to his and his Son's reputations, and may even place their jobs in jeopardy, particularly Kyle's.
So, if I'm Shanahan, I'm thinking why not give up the #1's for 2012, 2013 and 2014 for best QB that's come along in more than a decade? After all, another losing season, and the damage to their reputations may mean neither one of them may be here in 2013 to worry about those spent picks.
When you look at the young RB talent on the offensive side, along with the solid vets like Moss and Gaffney, and the potential of Hankerson, AA, etc. I believe ... and I think Shanahan believes that they've got enough talent on offense to be extremely successful with a good QB running the offense, and a guy like Luck might be that long term anchor for the Redskin's Franchise for the next decade.
Let's keep one thing in mind ..... Shanahan always manages to put together a running game ... and he's got two outstanding kids with Helu and Royster. All he needs now is another Elway or Cutler.
I think Shanahan is going to move heaven and earth to try and get Luck to make Kyle's offense shake and bake. He'd be crazy not to. And if he does manage to pull that off, I'll take back my criticisms, one and all. But if he balks, and tries to retain those picks and misses the opportunity to get that desperately needed anchor this team has been missing, and tries to make another backup QB a starter, I don't think is job security is worth a dime.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:33 pm
by SprintRightOption
What did John Elway and Jay Cutler have in common? Arguably the strongest arms in the league at the time. There is a high probability that the next quarterback will have a rocket throwing arm. So, who in the draft has the best arms?
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 4:46 pm
by Kilmer72
SprintRightOption wrote:What did John Elway and Jay Cutler have in common? Arguably the strongest arms in the league at the time. There is a high probability that the next quarterback will have a rocket throwing arm. So, who in the draft has the best arms?
So did JC so I doubt that's it.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:03 pm
by CanesSkins26
frankcal20 wrote:Like i said in another thread, these statements lead me to believe that they won't go after a 1st round guy. I think they've studied and identified a guy they can develop how they like the QB position to be played.
I dont see how you could reasonable come to that conclusion based on those comments. Do you really expect him to give away his draft strategy in an interview?
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:40 pm
by Red_One43
SprintRightOption wrote:What did John Elway and Jay Cutler have in common? Arguably the strongest arms in the league at the time. There is a high probability that the next quarterback will have a rocket throwing arm. So, who in the draft has the best arms?
SRO, I think you have the right idea about looking at past QBs Shanny liked to predict who he will pick in the draft, but I think you have to look at all of them especially the ones he actually picked either through the draft or FA.
Maddox 6' 4"
Brister - 6' 3"
Plummer - 6' 2"
Cutler - 6' 3"
McNabb - 6' 2"
*At least 6' 2"
*All have mobility
*Arms - Don't know about Maddox, but all the others do so I would suppose he did too.
Note* Rex was not Mike's guy - he doesn't fit the profile.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:20 pm
by aswas71788
If Shanahan goes after Luck, if he is available, it will be costly. One thing that most are forgetting is that the Redskins actually do have some top caliber players to add in a trade. Fred Davis, for example, would probably equal a 2nd. If the team holding the draft pick for Luck has a need for a potentially great tight end, Davis would be a welcome add for them.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:25 pm
by Kilmer72
CanesSkins26 wrote:frankcal20 wrote:Like i said in another thread, these statements lead me to believe that they won't go after a 1st round guy. I think they've studied and identified a guy they can develop how they like the QB position to be played.
I dont see how you could reasonable come to that conclusion based on those comments. Do you really expect him to give away his draft strategy in an interview?
He also said that he usually evaluates college QBs mid way through the season. That tells me that he does this often, like every year.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:28 pm
by DarthMonk
Red_One43 wrote:SprintRightOption wrote:What did John Elway and Jay Cutler have in common? Arguably the strongest arms in the league at the time. There is a high probability that the next quarterback will have a rocket throwing arm. So, who in the draft has the best arms?
SRO, I think you have the right idea about looking at past QBs Shanny liked to predict who he will pick in the draft, but I think you have to look at all of them especially the ones he actually picked either through the draft or FA.
Maddox 6' 4"
Brister - 6' 3"
Plummer - 6' 2"
Cutler - 6' 3"
McNabb - 6' 2"
*At least 6' 2"
*All have mobility
*Arms - Don't know about Maddox, but all the others do so I would suppose he did too.
Note* Rex was not Mike's guy - he doesn't fit the profile.
Interesting. Tallish athletic mobile guys with fairly big arms. Not a statue in the bunch.
I was never in favor of trading a lot to move up but some of the posts I've seen have me vacillating.
DarthMonk
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 6:59 pm
by RayNAustin
SprintRightOption wrote:What did John Elway and Jay Cutler have in common? Arguably the strongest arms in the league at the time. There is a high probability that the next quarterback will have a rocket throwing arm. So, who in the draft has the best arms?
Well, Shanahan inherited Elway, so from a draft standpoint, any comparison is meaningless.
Shanahan has drafted 6 QBs ... Brian Griese and Jay Culter both being early picks projected to be starters. The other 4 were late rounders that were never expected to make a statement, and didn't.
What is relevant is that Shanahan did trade up to pick Cutler, and he followed conventional wisdom in picking him ... as the analysis was Young, Leinart, and Cutler, as the 1st, 2nd and 3rd QBs in that draft. He may have even liked Cutler more that the other two ... we'll probably never know.
But Luck fits the Cutler profile, though not possessing the rocket arm Cutler has, he's got plenty of arm to make the throws, and has all of the other skills to become a top flight player, including the football intelligence and demonstrated ability to operate from a pro set. Of course, Luck has been compared to Elway given that they both hail from Stanford, with many saying that Luck is the best QB since Elway, and may even be a little ahead of where Elway was, development wise as a QB. While Elway relied on a howitzer arm and athletic ability, Luck relies on accuracy, touch and intelligence, and is a little bigger than Elway, though still extremely athletic and able to move well.
Then, we have the urgency factor. Shanahan needs a QB now ... not two years from now. Luck is the most NFL ready player of all of the QBs in the draft, and the only one considered to be a day one starter.
Who knows ... maybe Shanny is thinking of trading up a couple of places to take RG3 ... but that's a much riskier proposition given the need to transition to a pro set. That transition isn't just about operating from center, and dropping back .... there's more complexity to a pro style offense than a college spread, and Luck is miles ahead of RG3 just from that standpoint alone. Luck only needs to learn the playbook and verbiage, while RG3 will have to learn the position and the playbook too.
The only decided advantage RG3 has over Luck is speed and he's shown to have a better deep ball. But is that enough to convince Shanahan to take such a gamble? Possible, but I would only do it if all efforts failed to get Luck. One of these two guys needs to be a Redskin. RG3 is 2nd place in the running.
Re: Shanahan's Finally Honest About QB Situation
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:23 pm
by Irn-Bru
riggofan wrote:No offense - and I'm not addressing you directly Hogster - but I'm so sick of fans and radio people throwing out the "stake my reputation" thing like it was some huge blunder by Shanahan. The guy was a COACH about to start the season with one mediocre QB and one unknown QB at best. Was he *really* supposed to come out and say, "You know I am not 100% sure that these guys can get it done, they're just the best guys we could get right now"?
Seriously, if you were a head coach, is that what you would say to build confidence in your QBs?
It was also one comment in one interview early on. I guess you have to latch onto something, but it really was blown out of proportion.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 7:42 pm
by Redskin in Canada
aswas71788 wrote:The problem with Sanchez is that the Jets will want a first round pick for him, even if they were willing to trade him which I doubt. ...
I will gladly give our 1st pick in the Draft for him.
Doubt is reasonable but if they fail to make the playoffs all bets are off. I still believe in the possibility of this option.

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 8:21 pm
by Red_One43
aswas71788 wrote:If Shanahan goes after Luck, if he is available, it will be costly. One thing that most are forgetting is that the Redskins actually do have some top caliber players to add in a trade. Fred Davis, for example, would probably equal a 2nd. If the team holding the draft pick for Luck has a need for a potentially great tight end, Davis would be a welcome add for them.
You are right that we have some players that could be part of a trade, but Fred could only be part of that with a sign and trade deal. He is an FA.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:15 pm
by Irn-Bru
Redskin in Canada wrote:aswas71788 wrote:The problem with Sanchez is that the Jets will want a first round pick for him, even if they were willing to trade him which I doubt. ...
I will gladly give our 1st pick in the Draft for him.
Doubt is reasonable but if they fail to make the playoffs all bets are off. I still believe in the possibility of this option.

Me too. I'm rooting against the Jets this weekend as their coach is a bloated egomaniac who deserves his fall after guaranteeing a Super Bowl. (See my sig.) This is just another reason to do it: it might lead to an irrational Jets decision that gives the Skins a QB.
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:53 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
I'm in the mind that enough is enough as far as qb is concerned. As much as I agree w the jets statements about the coach and them getting worked this weekend... I feel Sanchez would be another fix it qb that just isn't good enough. Not enough upside. With the weapons he has and time in the system he should be much better imo. This year he has proven to be not much better if any then our beloved Sexy Rexy. Horrible decisions throwing to the wrong route time after time... He just isn't all that. No way we give a first for him I'd rather Ponder or even Kolb say no to dirty Sanchez! Lmao any way I'm with the luck and/or RGIII supporters. If RG does come out he instantly makes trading up cheaper. We can then play hardball with the top two possibly three spots w picks/ players u name it. For the second overall pick we can deal w st Louis a team shanny already has been and get a top tier YOUNG qb for cheaper then the number one overall. Be Luck, RG, Jones.... whom ever- the shanny MUST make a big move in the draft for a lot more reasons then fan appeal job security and winning record.... I'm hopeful we get one of the top two
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:58 pm
by welch
“He’s a smart guy,” Kyle Shanahan said. “I think you can calm him down a little and make him feel like, ‘Hey, you don’t have to try to make all these plays to win the game. We’re in the game. We’ve got a lead. We can run the ball. We can do this. We can do that.’ Then, you don’t have to do as many risky decisions that he has done in the past.”
But at the same time, he acknowledged that the Redskins do not have a top-tier quarterback on their roster.
“Everybody’s looking for a franchise quarterback,” Kyle Shanahan said. “You want one of those guys that there’s no question about. There’s probably only about five or six of them in the league. Then, there’s a lot of guys who can play and a lot of guys who need to be replaced. You’re always trying to find that one and [we’re] still looking to do it.”
Plainly ambiguous statement. Clearly says nothing clearly, except that every team wants an all-star QB (surprise!!!) and that there are only five or six in the league. (another surprise).
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:00 pm
by Red_One43
welch wrote:
“He’s a smart guy,” Kyle Shanahan said. “I think you can calm him down a little and make him feel like, ‘Hey, you don’t have to try to make all these plays to win the game. We’re in the game. We’ve got a lead. We can run the ball. We can do this. We can do that.’ Then, you don’t have to do as many risky decisions that he has done in the past.”
But at the same time, he acknowledged that the Redskins do not have a top-tier quarterback on their roster.
“Everybody’s looking for a franchise quarterback,” Kyle Shanahan said. “You want one of those guys that there’s no question about. There’s probably only about five or six of them in the league. Then, there’s a lot of guys who can play and a lot of guys who need to be replaced. You’re always trying to find that one and [we’re] still looking to do it.”
Plainly ambiguous statement. Clearly says nothing clearly, except that every team wants an all-star QB (surprise!!!) and that there are only five or six in the league. (another surprise).
Then, there’s a lot of guys who can play and a lot of guys who need to be replaced. You’re always trying to find that one and [we’re] still looking to do it.
Reading between the lines, Kyle seems to be preparing the fans in the event that Luck or RGIII are not going to be Redskins next year -
"there's a lot of guys who can play." My translation - Just because we were unable to get Luck or RGIII doesn't mean that our guy can't get the job done.
"We're still looking to do it (find that guy). My translation: Don't worry, Rex ain't our guy.