new kick off rule adds safty
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:20 pm
subtracts excitement ..... kick offs are now pointless,just spot the ball at the 20 and be done with it.


](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)

Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
redskinz4ever wrote:subtracts excitement ..... kick offs are now pointless,just spot the ball at the 20 and be done with it.![]()
![]()
BigRedskinDaddy wrote:Not to thread jack or anything, but:
Can anyone else remember when kickoffs or punts used to be followed by game action without yet another commercial break? I understand the NFL is a business driven by network sponsors, but it seems ridiculously redundant to have a commercial break, a pointless kickoff, then another commercial break. Something should be done to change that up.
BigRedskinDaddy wrote:Not to thread jack or anything, but:
Can anyone else remember when kickoffs or punts used to be followed by game action without yet another commercial break? I understand the NFL is a business driven by network sponsors, but it seems ridiculously redundant to have a commercial break, a pointless kickoff, then another commercial break. Something should be done to change that up.
yupchagee wrote:BigRedskinDaddy wrote:Not to thread jack or anything, but:
Can anyone else remember when kickoffs or punts used to be followed by game action without yet another commercial break? I understand the NFL is a business driven by network sponsors, but it seems ridiculously redundant to have a commercial break, a pointless kickoff, then another commercial break. Something should be done to change that up.
It's even worse than that. TD, comercial, PAT, comercial, KO, comercial, ref scratches his nose, comercial.
LOL u jacked my threadBigRedskinDaddy wrote:Not to thread jack or anything, but:
Can anyone else remember when kickoffs or punts used to be followed by game action without yet another commercial break? I understand the NFL is a business driven by network sponsors, but it seems ridiculously redundant to have a commercial break, a pointless kickoff, then another commercial break. Something should be done to change that up.
redskinz4ever wrote:LOL u jacked my thread![]()
no worriesBigRedskinDaddy wrote:redskinz4ever wrote:LOL u jacked my thread![]()
Ha ha, I suppose I did. My apologies brother.
jeremyroyce wrote:You know I don't really have a problem with this rule change, and quite honestly I don't understand all of the criticism. We all knew during the lockout that this had changed and it's not like any teams were caught with their pants down and as if there lining up to kick the ball off to start the game the officials come running out and say "Hey we changed the rule, you gotta kick off from the 35 now". Everybody knew about for a while now. What, I have an issue with is the over time rule, which it used to be Sudden Death. I think it's fair to say that each team has 60 minutes to decide the game, then if you can't then the first team that scores win. Now, obviously they don't like that rule because heaven for bid that a team lose to a kicker then why not play the full amount of time in over time and whoever has the lead at the end of over time wins.
DarthMonk wrote:BTW - is it still sudden death in regular season and the complex multi-possession thing for the post-season?
DarthMonkjeremyroyce wrote:You know I don't really have a problem with this rule change, and quite honestly I don't understand all of the criticism. We all knew during the lockout that this had changed and it's not like any teams were caught with their pants down and as if there lining up to kick the ball off to start the game the officials come running out and say "Hey we changed the rule, you gotta kick off from the 35 now". Everybody knew about for a while now. What, I have an issue with is the over time rule, which it used to be Sudden Death. I think it's fair to say that each team has 60 minutes to decide the game, then if you can't then the first team that scores win. Now, obviously they don't like that rule because heaven for bid that a team lose to a kicker then why not play the full amount of time in over time and whoever has the lead at the end of over time wins.