The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

MIAMI — Authorities said the wife of Brandon Marshall stabbed the Miami Dolphins wide receiver with a kitchen knife, and his agent said Saturday that the player was recovering.

Michi Nogami-Marshall, 26, was arrested Friday evening and charged with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. According to the Broward County Sheriff's Office arrest report, Nogami-Marshall told officers she was defending herself. Marshall had earlier told officers he slipped and fell onto a broken glass vase, but the officers noted that evidence at the scene didn't substantiate that claim.

Nogami-Marshall remained jailed Saturday on $7,500 bond. It was unclear if she had an attorney.

"This is a very difficult time for Brandon and family, thankfully he will make a full recovery," Marshall's agent, Kennard McGuire, said in a statement.

The NFL lockout restricts team contact with players. However, Dolphins officials said they were told by the league their team doctor is allowed to see Marshall and consult with Marshall's other doctors.

Marshall married Michi Nogami in Miami last July. They met while both were students at Central Florida. They live in Southwest Ranches, which is near the Dolphins' complex in Davie.

A year ago last week, Marshall, 27, was traded to the Dolphins by the Denver Broncos for two second-round draft picks. In Denver, he caught at least 100 passes three consecutive years and twice made the Pro Bowl. Yet he wore out his welcome, in part because of a long legal record.

In March 2009, Marshall was arrested in Atlanta on misdemeanor battery charges stemming from a fight with Nogami-Marshall, who was his fiancee at the time. The charges were dropped when both refused to testify.

Marshall was also involved in a New Year's Eve fight that led to the 2007 drive-by slaying of Broncos teammate Darrent Williams.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/ ... 34331.html


Man, this is terrible. I hope you get better Brandon

This IS terrible. I wonder if this would have happened if the Lockout hadn't been going. After, players are going to be around the house more often and then the tension of the unkown.

Hope we don't see a rise in these domestic situations.

Wishing him a speedy recovery, but it looks like a long legal situation ensuing.

Red_One43 wrote:This is terrible. I wonder if this would have happened if the Lockout hadn't been going. After, players are going to be around the house more often and then the tension of the unkown.

Hope we don't see a rise in these domestic situations.

Wishing him a speedy recovery, but it looks like a long legal situation ensuing.

He'll be fine... both physically and fiscally... but...

Yes, of course... it's the NFL's fault (that certainly seems to be your implication). Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Marshall is a narcisistic child in an adult body, with a history of domestic and civil violence...

Why would you hold Marshall to a lower behavioral standard than anyone else? This hand-wringing demeans every couple who has struggled through an actual crisis, but yet, continue to respect each other.

Don't give me the "tension of the unknowns" either... what freaking "unknowns" does he have??? "How am I going to get on the cover of SI if I don't play this year???" Crap. He's set for life, as long as he has a clue.

I was a soldier. I've been without a job. I know all about "unknowns", as does my wife. We've never tried to kill each other.

Oh... and, I'm glad he's going to be ok... He's a heck of a football player...

Another example of why a lot of us opposed trading for him. Too bad, but too predictable.

Countertrey wrote:

Red_One43 wrote:This is terrible. I wonder if this would have happened if the Lockout hadn't been going. After, players are going to be around the house more often and then the tension of the unkown.

Hope we don't see a rise in these domestic situations.

Wishing him a speedy recovery, but it looks like a long legal situation ensuing.

He'll be fine... both physically and fiscally... but...

Yes, of course... it's the NFL's fault (that certainly seems to be your implication). Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Marshall is a narcisistic child in an adult body, with a history of domestic and civil violence...

Why would you hold Marshall to a lower behavioral standard than anyone else? This hand-wringing demeans every couple who has struggled through an actual crisis, but yet, continue to respect each other.

Don't give me the "tension of the unknowns" either... what freaking "unknowns" does he have??? "How am I going to get on the cover of SI if I don't play this year???" Crap. He's set for life, as long as he has a clue.

I was a soldier. I've been without a job. I know all about "unknowns", as does my wife. We've never tried to kill each other.

Oh... and, I'm glad he's going to be ok... He's a heck of a football player...

With you being a soldier, I thought that you would understand my point. Quite often, when our soldiers came back from the field, we would have domestic situations. Sometimes our soldiers joked that going to the field saved their marriages.

The only thing that I was implying in my post is that folks who do not know how to handle situations in marriage sometimes have more problems when they are home more than usual. No one is holding anyone to a lower standard.

Of course you and your wife never tried to kill each other, because you are NOT a narcisistic child in an adult body as you say Marshall is.
So, why compare yourself to him or any other person with behavioral problems?

You read waaaaaaay to much in my post. Matter of fact you tried to make it say something it didn't. No one is blaming the NFL for what happened in Marshall's household. Just like I never blamed the Army for any of the domestic situations that arose. Our soldiers were held accountable for their transgressions whether they were domestic in nature or not.

There have been several articles written wondering if there would be a rise in players getting into trouble during the lockout, because sometimes people do get into trouble when they have more time on their hands than usual. This doesn't mean, as you know, that this is going to happen to mature, responsible people, but as you know, there are some players who aren't mature and responsible. It is a legitimate issue to raise. It doens't mean that all incidents that occur during this period are related to the lockout. What is looked for is a spike in the number of incidents during a similar period - you know how statistics work. No one is demeaning any couples by raising these questions.

Could the Marshall domestic incident have happed at anytime, yes, but when things change in a family situation, tensions may rise. This not an excuse but a reality. Tensions, you ask? But then you add, "if he has a clue." You know that it is quite probable that a man with his history of behavioral problems doesn't have a clue and might not have saved his money for the lockout as you know a lot of the players didn't thus the high interest loans being taken out by players.

Now, concerning my post, I raised two questions that I saw raised in a couple of articles. My post reads as it is. There is no implication of blame of the NFL. There is no implication that Marshall and/or his wife are not responsible for their actions.

KazooSkinsFan wrote:Another example of why a lot of us opposed trading for him. Too bad, but too predictable.

Those thoughts came into my head when I first read about the incident.

Red_One43 wrote:

Countertrey wrote:

Red_One43 wrote:This is terrible. I wonder if this would have happened if the Lockout hadn't been going. After, players are going to be around the house more often and then the tension of the unkown.

Hope we don't see a rise in these domestic situations.

Wishing him a speedy recovery, but it looks like a long legal situation ensuing.

He'll be fine... both physically and fiscally... but...

Yes, of course... it's the NFL's fault (that certainly seems to be your implication). Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Marshall is a narcisistic child in an adult body, with a history of domestic and civil violence...

Why would you hold Marshall to a lower behavioral standard than anyone else? This hand-wringing demeans every couple who has struggled through an actual crisis, but yet, continue to respect each other.

Don't give me the "tension of the unknowns" either... what freaking "unknowns" does he have??? "How am I going to get on the cover of SI if I don't play this year???" Crap. He's set for life, as long as he has a clue.

I was a soldier. I've been without a job. I know all about "unknowns", as does my wife. We've never tried to kill each other.

Oh... and, I'm glad he's going to be ok... He's a heck of a football player...

With you being a soldier, I thought that you would understand my point. Quite often, when our soldiers came back from the field, we would have domestic situations. Sometimes our soldiers joked that going to the field saved their marriages.

The only thing that I was implying in my post is that folks who do not know how to handle situations in marriage sometimes have more problems when they are home more than usual. No one is holding anyone to a lower standard.

Of course you and your wife never tried to kill each other, because you are NOT a narcisistic child in an adult body as you say Marshall is.
So, why compare yourself to him or any other person with behavioral problems?

You read waaaaaaay to much in my post. Matter of fact you tried to make it say something it didn't. No one is blaming the NFL for what happened in Marshall's household. Just like I never blamed the Army for any of the domestic situations that arose. Our soldiers were held accountable for their transgressions whether they were domestic in nature or not.

There have been several articles written wondering if there would be a rise in players getting into trouble during the lockout, because sometimes people do get into trouble when they have more time on their hands than usual. This doesn't mean, as you know, that this is going to happen to mature, responsible people, but as you know, there are some players who aren't mature and responsible. It is a legitimate issue to raise. It doens't mean that all incidents that occur during this period are related to the lockout. What is looked for is a spike in the number of incidents during a similar period - you know how statistics work. No one is demeaning any couples by raising these questions.

Could the Marshall domestic incident have happed at anytime, yes, but when things change in a family situation, tensions may rise. This not an excuse but a reality. Tensions, you ask? But then you add, "if he has a clue." You know that it is quite probable that a man with his history of behavioral problems doesn't have a clue and might not have saved his money for the lockout as you know a lot of the players didn't thus the high interest loans being taken out by players.

Now, concerning my post, I raised two questions that I saw raised in a couple of articles. My post reads as it is. There is no implication of blame of the NFL. There is no implication that Marshall and/or his wife are not responsible for their actions.

Re-reading your prior post. I read it the same wat CT did.

yupchagee wrote:

Red_One43 wrote:

Countertrey wrote:

Red_One43 wrote:This is terrible. I wonder if this would have happened if the Lockout hadn't been going. After, players are going to be around the house more often and then the tension of the unkown.

Hope we don't see a rise in these domestic situations.

Wishing him a speedy recovery, but it looks like a long legal situation ensuing.

He'll be fine... both physically and fiscally... but...

Yes, of course... it's the NFL's fault (that certainly seems to be your implication). Couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Marshall is a narcisistic child in an adult body, with a history of domestic and civil violence...

Why would you hold Marshall to a lower behavioral standard than anyone else? This hand-wringing demeans every couple who has struggled through an actual crisis, but yet, continue to respect each other.

Don't give me the "tension of the unknowns" either... what freaking "unknowns" does he have??? "How am I going to get on the cover of SI if I don't play this year???" Crap. He's set for life, as long as he has a clue.

I was a soldier. I've been without a job. I know all about "unknowns", as does my wife. We've never tried to kill each other.

Oh... and, I'm glad he's going to be ok... He's a heck of a football player...

With you being a soldier, I thought that you would understand my point. Quite often, when our soldiers came back from the field, we would have domestic situations. Sometimes our soldiers joked that going to the field saved their marriages.

The only thing that I was implying in my post is that folks who do not know how to handle situations in marriage sometimes have more problems when they are home more than usual. No one is holding anyone to a lower standard.

Of course you and your wife never tried to kill each other, because you are NOT a narcisistic child in an adult body as you say Marshall is.
So, why compare yourself to him or any other person with behavioral problems?

You read waaaaaaay to much in my post. Matter of fact you tried to make it say something it didn't. No one is blaming the NFL for what happened in Marshall's household. Just like I never blamed the Army for any of the domestic situations that arose. Our soldiers were held accountable for their transgressions whether they were domestic in nature or not.

There have been several articles written wondering if there would be a rise in players getting into trouble during the lockout, because sometimes people do get into trouble when they have more time on their hands than usual. This doesn't mean, as you know, that this is going to happen to mature, responsible people, but as you know, there are some players who aren't mature and responsible. It is a legitimate issue to raise. It doens't mean that all incidents that occur during this period are related to the lockout. What is looked for is a spike in the number of incidents during a similar period - you know how statistics work. No one is demeaning any couples by raising these questions.

Could the Marshall domestic incident have happed at anytime, yes, but when things change in a family situation, tensions may rise. This not an excuse but a reality. Tensions, you ask? But then you add, "if he has a clue." You know that it is quite probable that a man with his history of behavioral problems doesn't have a clue and might not have saved his money for the lockout as you know a lot of the players didn't thus the high interest loans being taken out by players.

Now, concerning my post, I raised two questions that I saw raised in a couple of articles. My post reads as it is. There is no implication of blame of the NFL. There is no implication that Marshall and/or his wife are not responsible for their actions.

Re-reading your prior post. I read it the same wat CT did.

Thank you for sharing your opinion. CT claimed that I "seemed" to be implying a blame on the NFL and excusing Marshall and that I am saying there is tension where there is none. You say you see the same. Of course, I am assuming you read it with objectivity.

OK, reading into another's writing happens - I clarified what I meant.

Since in my response, I clearly stated I wasn't blaming NFL and wasn't excusing Marshall and that evidence shows that players are not taking care of themselves financially ( that evidence being the number of high interest loans taken out by the players) thus tension; at his point, whether or not you or anybody else thinks my original post blames anybody is moot, because I told you want I meant.

Now, let's cut to the chase, when something is not written in words and is not stated, a reader must read into it to come up with what isn't there. Since you and CT are readng something, that isn't written, perhaps there is something on your mind that you would like to debate - direct me to the thread and BRING IT ON! I don't have a problem explicitly stating a position on a topic and debating it. Sorry guys on this thread, I have no position just raising questions - I will wait till the data comes out before forming my opinion.

Red_One43 wrote:Now, let's cut to the chase, when something is not written in words and is not stated, a reader must read into it to come up with what isn't there. Since you and CT are readng something, that isn't written, perhaps there is something on your mind that you would like to debate - direct me to the thread and BRING IT ON! I don't have a problem explicitly stating a position on a topic and debating it. Sorry guys on this thread, I have no position just raising questions - I will wait till the data comes out before forming my opinion.

It's your own fault because your statement you wonder if it had happened but for the lockout was out of left field, unexplained (still) and just flat out bizarre. I'm not seeing that people thought that since you made a point on a message board that point just might have meant something. Instead of dancing, why don't you either just admit it didn't make any sense or actually make sense of it?

Unfortunately this type of thing (domestic stabbings) probably happen every dag gone day but it gets blown up when it happens to someone famous. I can care less what happened and who was at fault, I am happy that he'll live though.. kinda tired of our NFL players dying prematurely.

Kazo, I agree bro.. though I usually say "lets get him", I didn't say that about him because I do remember him in practice punting the ball around the field, etc..

On 8th thought, CT, Yupchagee, and Kazoo thank you for the posts. They have served as a wake-up call for me and that IS a good thing.
Challenges to posts in the long run can make one produce better posts.
Looking forward to some more discussions and most definitely, more debates and challenges.

Red

To answer your question... I don't think the lockout had anything to do with it, Most teams would have been between OTAs as Easter was approaching. Any other player I may hav had a different opinion but I'm sure we will find out Brandon was being Brandon

1niksder wrote:To answer your question... I don't think the lockout had anything to do with it, Most teams would have been between OTAs as Easter was approaching. Any other player I may hav had a different opinion but I'm sure we will find out Brandon was being Brandon

I would have to agree especially with a teammate commenting words to the effect, why am I not surprised. Thus far we haven't seen a spike in behavioral issues during this lockout.