Page 1 of 1
Let's Play ALL 2nd stringers vs. Jags.....
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:54 pm
by tribeofjudah
Looks like Rob Jackson is starting for Orakpo, even in front of Chris Wilson. Is this guy any good?
Wow, let's put in Riley too and all the other 2nd stringers. That stinker (Riley) cost us a TD runback by Banks.
Let the Evaluation sessions begin.
http://www.redskins.com/gen/articles/Wi ... 181741.jsp
Re: Let's Play ALL 2nd stringers vs. Jags.....
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:12 pm
by Red_One43
tribeofjudah wrote:Looks like Rob Jackson is starting for Orakpo, even in front of Chris Wilson. Is this guy any good?
Wow, let's put in Riley too and all the other 2nd stringers. That stinker (Riley) cost us a TD runback by Banks.
Let the Evaluation sessions begin.
We'll find out about Rob won't we. That what the evaluation is about. If he wants to be on this team next year, he better play his behind off.
Riley played well last week. He proved he could tackle. That's something a few of the Skins defenders need to learn. He is still a stinker though on ST, but I'll keep him for next year to play inside LB and possibly start.
http://www.redskins.com/gen/articles/Wi ... 181741.jsp
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:15 am
by VetSkinsFan
Riley has looked good on defense. And the call on Riley on ST happens a lot more when you get guys who like to change direction a lot. Just part of the game.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:53 am
by Countertrey
Rob Jackson made the most of his chance... he looked like he really belonged on the field.
Riley, I will bet, will be replacing MacIntosh next year
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:35 am
by VetSkinsFan
Countertrey wrote:
Riley, I will bet, will be replacing MacIntosh next year
I thought Rocky was playing pretty well. I do like Riley, though. I don't think I'd be upset if either were in there honestly.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:53 am
by Shabutie
VetSkinsFan wrote:Countertrey wrote:
Riley, I will bet, will be replacing MacIntosh next year
I thought Rocky was playing pretty well. I do like Riley, though. I don't think I'd be upset if either were in there honestly.
Rocky was not playing well at all and has been below-average every year as a Redskin. Definitely should not be back next year.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:55 am
by Countertrey
Shabutie wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:Countertrey wrote:
Riley, I will bet, will be replacing MacIntosh next year
I thought Rocky was playing pretty well. I do like Riley, though. I don't think I'd be upset if either were in there honestly.
Rocky was not playing well at all and has been below-average every year as a Redskin. Definitely should not be back next year.
Rocky will not be re-signed... hopefully, we will get a decent compensation pick...
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:28 pm
by Irn-Bru
I think Rocky's injury a few years back has kept him from reaching his potential. He had a very good start to his career in the league, but has since really fizzled out. We definitely need some talent at LB, despite the fact that London Fletcher doesn't seem to age whatsoever.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:48 pm
by Red_One43
Shabutie wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:Countertrey wrote:
Riley, I will bet, will be replacing MacIntosh next year
I thought Rocky was playing pretty well. I do like Riley, though. I don't think I'd be upset if either were in there honestly.
Rocky was not playing well at all and has been below-average every year as a Redskin. Definitely should not be back next year.
I agree. Riley has a more aggressive attitude than Rocky. That's why he makes tackles in the open field. This aggression is what Shanahan was talking about when he forgave Riley on the block in the back during the Vikes game. We need more players with this aggressive attitude.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:09 pm
by Countertrey
Red_One43 wrote:Shabutie wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:Countertrey wrote:
Riley, I will bet, will be replacing MacIntosh next year
I thought Rocky was playing pretty well. I do like Riley, though. I don't think I'd be upset if either were in there honestly.
Rocky was not playing well at all and has been below-average every year as a Redskin. Definitely should not be back next year.
I agree. Riley has a more aggressive attitude than Rocky. That's why he makes tackles in the open field. This aggression is what Shanahan was talking about when he forgave Riley on the block in the back during the Vikes game. We need more players with this aggressive attitude.
Riley is also...
FAST Has range and is a sure tackler. I think he and Fletcher will be one bad duo in the middle. I'm hoping Fletch has at least one more quality year...
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:31 pm
by tribeofjudah
I think Rob Jackson is playing for a roster spot next year. He did well vs. Jags.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:43 pm
by Countertrey
tribeofjudah wrote:I think Rob Jackson is playing for a roster spot next year. He did well vs. Jags.
Rob Johnson looks like a 3-4 OLB.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:52 pm
by KCskin
I wouldn't let Rocky go unless he wants too much money.
Until they get another guy to develop for ILB, he'll be a quality depth guy.
Still provides a 4-3 option.
Rocky works hard and still isn't getting good protection from the Nose Tackle.
Shanahan refusing to play Albert at DE didn't help anybody either.
I only noticed Rob Jackson on 2 plays.
He has an odd style of being upright but keeping his hips square.
He looks like a cobra moving forward.
I don't know if that's good or not.
I'd like to see him again and pay closer attention.
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 10:53 pm
by tribeofjudah
Countertrey wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:I think Rob Jackson is playing for a roster spot next year. He did well vs. Jags.
Rob Johnson looks like a 3-4 OLB.
ahhh...ok, as long as he can contribute and help us win games - I'm all for it.