Page 1 of 3
Randy Moss?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:23 pm
by spudstr04
Randy Moss has been waived by the Vikings just weeks after Minnesota traded a third-round draft pick to the New England Patriots for the receiver, the NFL Network reported Monday.
Following the Minnesota Vikings' 28-18 loss to the New England Patriots, the Vikings receiver announced that he would not be answering any more questions from the media for the rest of the season.
Moss had not spoken to reporters since Oct. 13, taking a $25,000 fine from the NFL for failing to cooperate with the media. The money didn't sway him to open up last week in the days leading up to his return to New England, which traded him to the Vikings on Oct. 6.
"I got fined $25,000 for not speaking to you all. Me, personally, I really don't care," Moss said. "But at the same time, I do answer questions throughout the week. For the league to fine me $25,000, I'm not going to answer any more questions for the rest of this year. If it's going to be an interview, I'm going to conduct [it]. ... I'll ask myself the questions, then give y'all the answers. So from here on out, I'm not answering any more questions for the rest of this season."
In four games with the Vikings, Moss had 13 receptions for 174 yards and two touchdowns. The Vikings were 1-3 in those games, including Sunday's 28-18 loss at New England.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5752939The Vikings have given up on Moss just four games after acquiring him for a third-round pick on October 6. After calling out the coaching staff in his Sunday night press conference, Moss refused to travel with his teammates to Minnesota, instead staying in Boston with his family. He's now subject to the waivers process, with any team claiming him on the hook for his $6.4 million salary prorated over the rest of the season. The winless Bills have first dibs, but are not expected to bite. Moss indicated Sunday that he'd like to return to New England, but the Patriots are last in the waiver order. NFL Network's Jason La Canfora mentions Indianapolis and Washington as possible destinations. We'll know by 4PM ET if he's been claimed.
http://www.rotoworld.com/
WOW! Could he just fall in to our laps?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:26 pm
by Skeletor
What? and give up on Joey Galloway? Ludicrous!
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:28 pm
by VetSkinsFan
Skeletor wrote:What? and give up on Joey Galloway? Ludicrous!

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:29 pm
by ChrisHanburger
He's piece of crap, a locker room cancer, blah, blah, blah, but I' like to see him come to DC. Maybe they'd get a few good games from him before he turns on them too. At this point I'll take anything to jump start the offense.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:31 pm
by Justice Hog
So was T.O........but I'd still love to have a WR of that calibre play for the skins.. Now we just need a QB, right?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:36 pm
by VetSkinsFan
We got McNabb to win now, why not R Moss.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:38 pm
by TeeterSalad
I would go for this...I think he and McNabb could have good chemistry. We need something more on this offense, even when the line holds up better than it did this past week; it's just plain stagnant.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:43 pm
by everydayAskinsday
I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:44 pm
by The Hogster
He's worth it given that he won't cost a draft pick and cannot be worse than Joey Galloway and Roydell Williams.
CLAIM HIM!!
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:47 pm
by VetSkinsFan
everydayAskinsday wrote:I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
He's worth $6.2M pro-rated this year if picked up on waivers.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:51 pm
by spudstr04
He may be 33 years old, but he can still play. He keeps his body in tip-top shape a la T.O.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:52 pm
by Kilmer72
VetSkinsFan wrote:everydayAskinsday wrote:I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
He's worth $6.2M pro-rated this year if picked up on waivers.
How does this work? He is worth 6.2M? I don't understand. Can you or someone explain it in layman's terms?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:54 pm
by MDSKINSFAN
VetSkinsFan wrote:We got McNabb to win now, why not R Moss.
I know what you meant by this, and I completely agree.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:02 pm
by VetSkinsFan
Kilmer72 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:everydayAskinsday wrote:I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
He's worth $6.2M pro-rated this year if picked up on waivers.
How does this work? He is worth 6.2M? I don't understand. Can you or someone explain it in layman's terms?
Waivers is a system from worst to first where the teams can claim him for his current contract. His contract this year is for ~$6.2M. The year's 1/2 over (or close to it) so they only have to pay the games he's going to play for the claiming team.
If he clears waivers, he's a unrestricted free agent, and he gets whatever the team who he signs with gives him in a new contract.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:03 pm
by Redskin in Canada
ChrisHanburger wrote:He's piece of crap, a locker room cancer, blah, blah, blah, but I' like to see him come to DC. Maybe they'd get a few good games from him before he turns on them too. At this point I'll take anything to jump start the offense.
I do not think that this is a good pick. He brings on too many distractions.
We have enough player and coaches issues to add another one.
But hey, the FO might be as desperate as you are and they might think that this is worth it. I just do not think that this guy has any loyalty towards anything or anyone other than himself.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:11 pm
by tribeofjudah
Speculations are rampant again....
And how is this on Hog Wash..... it should be put on "Rumorville"
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:15 pm
by lowtharofthehill
Very doubtful the skins get any shot at him. We are in the middle of the waiver wire and a team like the Bills etc. with worse record will prolly get him.
However, we should put in a claim and I would like to see moss as a redskins.
I also wanted T.O. and T.O. is killing it again in Cincy looking like a top 5 WR still.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:18 pm
by tribeofjudah
VetSkinsFan wrote:Kilmer72 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:everydayAskinsday wrote:I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
He's worth $6.2M pro-rated this year if picked up on waivers.
How does this work? He is worth 6.2M? I don't understand. Can you or someone explain it in layman's terms?
Waivers is a system from worst to first where the teams can claim him for his current contract. His contract this year is for ~$6.2M. The year's 1/2 over (or close to it) so they only have to pay the games he's going to play for the claiming team.
If he clears waivers, he's a unrestricted free agent, and he gets whatever the team who he signs with gives him in a new contract.
But didn't some of that get "shaved off" by the Vikings?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:20 pm
by VetSkinsFan
tribeofjudah wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:Kilmer72 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:everydayAskinsday wrote:I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
He's worth $6.2M pro-rated this year if picked up on waivers.
How does this work? He is worth 6.2M? I don't understand. Can you or someone explain it in layman's terms?
Waivers is a system from worst to first where the teams can claim him for his current contract. His contract this year is for ~$6.2M. The year's 1/2 over (or close to it) so they only have to pay the games he's going to play for the claiming team.
If he clears waivers, he's a unrestricted free agent, and he gets whatever the team who he signs with gives him in a new contract.
But didn't some of that get "shaved off" by the Vikings?
That's why it's pro-rated for the games he will play with the claiming team. Whomever signs him will be on the hook for approximately 50% of that contract, or however many games are left.
According to a tweet:
The team that claims and acquires Moss on waivers would be on the hook for a $3.38 million remainder of his $6.4 million salary. According to Darin Gantt of the Rock Hill Herald, the Panthers are unlikely to show interest.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:26 pm
by Mississippi Hog
I look at it this way. He can't hurt. Bring him in for the rest of the season. If he brings the cancerous crap in, he is gone after the season. If we bloom, we sign him to an extension. Can't hurt to bring him in for 9 games. RM and AA on the outsides with Tana in the slot. We might actually have a dangerous tandem. Ala "the Posse"
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:32 pm
by Kilmer72
Mississippi Hog wrote:I look at it this way. He can't hurt. Bring him in for the rest of the season. If he brings the cancerous crap in, he is gone after the season. If we bloom, we sign him to an extension. Can't hurt to bring him in for 9 games. RM and AA on the outsides with Tana in the slot. We might actually have a dangerous tandem. Ala "the Posse"
Who is going to block?
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:33 pm
by Kilmer72
VetSkinsFan wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:Kilmer72 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:everydayAskinsday wrote:I would normally say no to this but we would obivously be able to get him for next to nothing this year and really at this point couldnt hurt..
we are on a bye week too so it would give him a slight chance to learn the offense and rest up heading into the 2nd half of the season
He's worth $6.2M pro-rated this year if picked up on waivers.
How does this work? He is worth 6.2M? I don't understand. Can you or someone explain it in layman's terms?
Waivers is a system from worst to first where the teams can claim him for his current contract. His contract this year is for ~$6.2M. The year's 1/2 over (or close to it) so they only have to pay the games he's going to play for the claiming team.
If he clears waivers, he's a unrestricted free agent, and he gets whatever the team who he signs with gives him in a new contract.
But didn't some of that get "shaved off" by the Vikings?
That's why it's pro-rated for the games he will play with the claiming team. Whomever signs him will be on the hook for approximately 50% of that contract, or however many games are left.
According to a tweet:
The team that claims and acquires Moss on waivers would be on the hook for a $3.38 million remainder of his $6.4 million salary. According to Darin Gantt of the Rock Hill Herald, the Panthers are unlikely to show interest.
Thank you I now understand.
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:25 pm
by 1niksder
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:35 pm
by VetSkinsFan
Yeah, I saw that too... bloggers and twitter is killing what little journalism is left in the sports world...
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:36 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
VetSkinsFan wrote:Yeah, I saw that too... bloggers and twitter is killing what little journalism is left in the sports world...
All they do is copy of each other. Jason reports something and everyone retweets it as truth trying to build credibility. It's a joke and I often tweet them and call them out on it. LOL