Page 1 of 2
McNabb says offense ready to 'explode'.........
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:28 pm
by tribeofjudah
Really.....wow...!!! OK, well let's put this into action. What..! It's a slow week of news.
Washington Redskins quarterback Donovan McNabb had an awful day Sunday throwing the football, but he insists that things are about to get going with this offense. McNabb had a 56.8 quarterback rating against in a 17-14 win over the Chicago Bears.
"If we could bring everything together, really we'd explode," quarterback Donovan McNabb said on his weekly radio show Tuesday on 980 ESPN. "I'm distraught. I'm upset because I know we can play better."
I don't see many signs of the Skins' offense exploding because the line doesn't have a lot of stability right now. But if Ryan Torain can continue to have big days, Washington will remain in games. McNabb was worried in training camp about how long it might take to feel comfortable in Mike Shanahan's offense. And that's still a concern.
McNabb doesn't think the Skins have caught a lot of breaks on offense.
"I think in this game that we play, you have to have a little bit of luck," said McNabb on Tuesday. "I've been on the other side of the ball where it seemed like the ball never bounced our way. ...Every now and then, you need a little bit of that. As you look across the league, you watch different teams, teams have that as well. It just so happens that we were able to get that a couple of days ago. The thing about it is, we're 4-3. No matter how you look at it -- if it's ugly, if it's pretty, if it's appealing, whatever it may be -- we're 4-3, We're No. 2 right now in the NFC East. We're in great position."
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/ ... to-explode
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:34 pm
by Shabutie
Any offense explodes when it puts everything together. This is a slow week.
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:46 pm
by chiefhog44
If they beat the Lions, then that the following week could be the biggest of the year.
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:25 pm
by TimSkin
we have a bye after the lions
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:51 pm
by tcwest10
I think said on-field explosion might possibly cause widespread concussions, leading to fines and possible suspension.
How 'bout you just score some? That would be good enough for me.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:16 pm
by oneman56
Wasn't the same thing being said after like week 3? I thought I remembered a very similar article and possible post on here for this before.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:21 pm
by Justice Hog
This is McNabb....."the sun will come out......tomorrow....." So far he's been all talk. I can't wait to see when (if ever) his play can speak louder than his mouth.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:38 pm
by cleg
Justice Hog wrote:This is McNabb....."the sun will come out......tomorrow....." So far he's been all talk. I can't wait to see when (if ever) his play can speak louder than his mouth.
You being from DE your cynicism to McNabb probably comes from being in the Eagles region. But, I have to say that despite his seemingly poor games I do not doubt for one second this team would be far worse than 4-3 without #5.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:40 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
I can't see it without more then two people he can throw the ball to
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:19 pm
by CanesSkins26
cleg wrote:Justice Hog wrote:This is McNabb....."the sun will come out......tomorrow....." So far he's been all talk. I can't wait to see when (if ever) his play can speak louder than his mouth.
You being from DE your cynicism to McNabb probably comes from being in the Eagles region. But, I have to say that despite his seemingly poor games I do not doubt for one second this team would be far worse than 4-3 without #5.
And you're basing this on what exactly? In our four win the victories have been driven by the defense primarily. In our four wins we have scored 13, 17, 16, and 17 points, respectively. In those games we're given up 7, 12, 13, and 14 points. Yes, some of these games we would have lost year for sure. However, I attribute the wins to Shanahan, not McNabb.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:19 pm
by riggofan
CanesSkins26 wrote:cleg wrote:Justice Hog wrote:This is McNabb....."the sun will come out......tomorrow....." So far he's been all talk. I can't wait to see when (if ever) his play can speak louder than his mouth.
You being from DE your cynicism to McNabb probably comes from being in the Eagles region. But, I have to say that despite his seemingly poor games I do not doubt for one second this team would be far worse than 4-3 without #5.
And you're basing this on what exactly? In our four win the victories have been driven by the defense primarily. In our four wins we have scored 13, 17, 16, and 17 points, respectively. In those games we're given up 7, 12, 13, and 14 points. Yes, some of these games we would have lost year for sure. However, I attribute the wins to Shanahan, not McNabb.
I must have missed Coach Shanahan tossing that TD pass to Armstrong.
Seriously, we have an insanely thin O-line. Our starting RB didn't even play in the league last year. Our #2 receiver is 40 years old. We have the 31st ranked kicker in the league. And the Washington football braintrust want us to complain about Donovan McNabb??? Give me a freaking break.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:21 pm
by HEROHAMO
To not give some Credit to Mcnabb is absurd.
The leadership, poise and experience of Mcnabb has already helped turn this thing around. Why do you think Shanahan brought him in?
There are a number of factors to consider with the progress of this offense.
1)A new offensive line starting to gel.
2)Lack luster and undersized receivers.
3)New offense.
We are 4-3 with the offense still developing. Can u imagine how good the team will be when the offense gets it together. As well as the defense.
Mcnabb haters stop it already. Its not like Peyton Manning is available.
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:26 pm
by tribeofjudah
HEROHAMO wrote:To not give some Credit to Mcnabb is absurd.
The leadership, poise and experience of Mcnabb has already helped turn this thing around. Why do you think Shanahan brought him in?
There are a number of factors to consider with the progress of this offense.
1)A new offensive line starting to gel.
2)Lack luster and undersized receivers.
3)New offense.
We are 4-3 with the offense still developing. Can u imagine how good the team will be when the offense gets it together. As well as the defense.
Mcnabb haters stop it already. Its not like Peyton Manning is available.
And that's exactly what Dmac is saying..... Give it time to explode.
No hatin' here.........just waitin......
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:32 am
by CanesSkins26
Why do you think Shanahan brought him in?
Right. I forgot that Shanahan had tons of options at qb during the offseason.
There are a number of factors to consider with the progress of this offense.
1)A new offensive line starting to gel.
2)Lack luster and undersized receivers.
3)New offense.
The offensive line is playing better than it has in either of the past two seasons. These are pretty much the same receivers that we have had the last few years. And the receivers have actually been getting open. McNabb just hasn't been able to hit them with any consistency. His leadership is undeniable but his performance on the field has not been good at all.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:40 am
by KazooSkinsFan
HEROHAMO wrote:To not give some Credit to Mcnabb is absurd.
The leadership, poise and experience of Mcnabb has already helped turn this thing around. Why do you think Shanahan brought him in?
There are a number of factors to consider with the progress of this offense.
1)A new offensive line starting to gel.
2)Lack luster and undersized receivers.
3)New offense.
We are 4-3 with the offense still developing. Can u imagine how good the team will be when the offense gets it together. As well as the defense.
Mcnabb haters stop it already. Its not like Peyton Manning is available.
Absolutely true. After a 4-12 season we're 4-3 against just a flat out brutal schedule and this year our D has not been shut down like last year. JC did enough to lose, McNabb does enough to win. It's a world of difference.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:48 am
by Skinsfan55
McNabb is right... this offense is one, maybe two drafts away from EXPLODING! We're so close!
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:58 am
by crazyhorse1
CanesSkins26 wrote:Why do you think Shanahan brought him in?
Right. I forgot that Shanahan had tons of options at qb during the offseason.
There are a number of factors to consider with the progress of this offense.
1)A new offensive line starting to gel.
2)Lack luster and undersized receivers.
3)New offense.
The offensive line is playing better than it has in either of the past two seasons. These are pretty much the same receivers that we have had the last few years. And the receivers have actually been getting open. McNabb just hasn't been able to hit them with any consistency. His leadership is undeniable but his performance on the field has not been good at all.
Our receivers are doing fine. We're four deep with quality guys who have been getting open, and I'm not counting Galloway. I also have to defend DMac. Sure, he's a bit eratic, but the problem is the OL...always the OL. The OL is terrible. It's the OL. Four of the five shouldn't be on the field and the fifth one is a rookie-- and not a great rookie as the PR machine would have it. Williams, at this point, is only an interesting prospect. He gives up sacks and pressures, might be injury prone, and opens few holes. He and Cory, together, are doing next to nothing for the ground game. We can run right, not right. Maybe someone has noticed.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:00 pm
by tribeofjudah
Skinsfan55 wrote:McNabb is right... this offense is one, maybe two drafts away from EXPLODING! We're so close!
that's like 2 years..........
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:10 pm
by langleyparkjoe
crazyhorse1 wrote:We can run right, not right. Maybe someone has noticed.
GREAT POINT
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:44 pm
by Skinsfan55
tribeofjudah wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:McNabb is right... this offense is one, maybe two drafts away from EXPLODING! We're so close!
that's like 2 years..........
You mean you can only have one draft a year? Oh man!
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:34 pm
by mastdark81
McNabb is another bandaid of the organization woes and and not a new bandaid, one that has begun loosing its elasticity and ready to fall off completely within a few years max.
Strong running game and a stout defense is essential for us to go to the SUPERBOWL (oh yeah a good kicker) to overcome his decline and our other weakness that make him look even worse (oline, wrs)
Were 4-3 people...what low expectations yall have. Were on pace to be 9-7 a familiar record that we had with Gibbs, and almost with Zorn one year. If we had a young buck at QB it would be all and dandy but to me it is SUPERBOWL or bust once again like it always is with our win-now management.
Let's hope McNabb's great deep ball rides us into Dallas for the SUPERBOWL.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:38 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
mastdark81 wrote:to me it is SUPERBOWL or bust once again like it always is with our win-now management.
Let's hope McNabb's great deep ball rides us into Dallas for the SUPERBOWL.
You realize if we're going to go for young players we need a QB or they're not going to develop much and even if we get a good young QB they're going to need a mentor? We have up pretty little for a starting QB for several years with the ability and success McNabb has. If we're going younger (which I hope we are) he's still a perfectly logical choice.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:45 pm
by Skinsfan55
mastdark81 wrote:McNabb is another bandaid of the organization woes and and not a new bandaid, one that has begun loosing its elasticity and ready to fall off completely within a few years max.
Strong running game and a stout defense is essential for us to go to the SUPERBOWL (oh yeah a good kicker) to overcome his decline and our other weakness that make him look even worse (oline, wrs)
Were 4-3 people...what low expectations yall have. Were on pace to be 9-7 a familiar record that we had with Gibbs, and almost with Zorn one year. If we had a young buck at QB it would be all and dandy but to me it is SUPERBOWL or bust once again like it always is with our win-now management.
Let's hope McNabb's great deep ball rides us into Dallas for the SUPERBOWL.
I don't think anyone expected the Redskins to be Super Bowl contenders after a 4-12 season last year, I think many expected us to go 7-9 or 8-8 and miss the playoffs (which probably won't happen now.)
What the big difference is though, is that we're taking steps in the right direction. So far Shanahan has drafted a top flight left tackle when there were "sexier" options on the board. He traded draft picks for a standout RT (who is playing through pain, and not 100%) and a franchise quarterback who is an excellent leader (but who still needs to learn the system.)
We've also got Bruce Allen and a strong defensive coordinator with head coaching experience. Shanahan is a great personnel man on the offensive side of the ball (look at what he did in Denver) and Has I'm sure has input on defensive players. Bruce Allen has made some good moves in the past, and his strong point is contract negotiation. For the first time since Snyder took over we have a strong front office and some credibility.
I fully expected to be a .500 team this year before we could add more pieces and really compete for a title. Things at least seem to be looking up. We've came close to beating the defending AFC champions, we've beaten Dallas, Philly, and Green Bay. This team looks tough, and will only get better.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:49 pm
by Deadskins
mastdark81 wrote:McNabb is another bandaid of the organization woes and and not a new bandaid, one that has begun loosing its elasticity and ready to fall off completely within a few years max.
No one ever expected him to be here more than a few years. Of course he's a band-aid, but with the gaping wound we had at the QB position, we needed to put something on it to keep the salt out.
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:51 pm
by Kilmer72
Deadskins wrote:mastdark81 wrote:McNabb is another bandaid of the organization woes and and not a new bandaid, one that has begun loosing its elasticity and ready to fall off completely within a few years max.
No one ever expected him to be here more than a few years. Of course he's a band-aid, but with the gaping wound we had at the QB position, we needed to put something on it to keep the salt out.
I agree...He is having an awful year but some is do to offensive line and some is do to just a bad year and new system. I think he needs to get benched for a game. When this was done in Philly he came out of it a new man. Just my opinion. He isn't all that bad and isn't all the great either even at his best. What makes me mad is as an Eagle he shined on national tv. This year he is flopping. Maybe he has lost it but I am thinking that he needs a week to reflect on what he is doing wrong.