The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.

spudstr04 wrote:http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.

I had forgotten high a percentage philly was passing. They threw around 60% of plays. That belies all the chatter out of philly about McNabb not being good enough. Why would the genius coach call that many pass plays if McNabb is so bad? I agree that a better running game will improve McNabbs performance.

SnyderSucks wrote:

spudstr04 wrote:http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.

I had forgotten high a percentage philly was passing. They threw around 60% of plays. That belies all the chatter out of philly about McNabb not being good enough. Why would the genius coach call that many pass plays if McNabb is so bad? I agree that a better running game will improve McNabbs performance.

Unless Mcnabb's numbers were inflated because he made so many attempts.

Deadskins wrote:

SnyderSucks wrote:

spudstr04 wrote:http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=5447359&autoplay=1&callsign=ESPNRADIO

They say that the better running game in Washington will benefit D-Nabb and that Clinton Portis will have a huge year. Listen to the radio broadcast and let me know what you think. I think 10-6 is a good guess, but I think we know as Redskins fans, that nothing would surprise us, 4-12 to 11-5 is possible with this team.

I had forgotten high a percentage philly was passing. They threw around 60% of plays. That belies all the chatter out of philly about McNabb not being good enough. Why would the genius coach call that many pass plays if McNabb is so bad? I agree that a better running game will improve McNabbs performance.

Unless Mcnabb's numbers were inflated because he made so many attempts.

Mcnabb's numbers can go both way's. Either way I'll take a chance.

from their lips to the football gods ears.

Doensn't McNabb have the lowest career INT %?

VetSkinsFan wrote:Doensn't McNabb have the lowest career INT %?

Its from Wikipedia....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Football_League_records_%28individual%29

Lowest pct. Passes Had Intercepted

* Most seasons led league lowest pct. not intercepted 5 Sammy Baugh 1940, 1942, 1944-1945, 1947
* Lowest pct. passes had intercepted career 2.09 Donovan McNabb 1999-2008
* Lowest pct. passes had intercepted season 0.41 Damon Huard 2006
* Lowest pct. passes had intercepted rookie season 1.98 Charlie Batch 1998 2002[3]