Page 1 of 1

If we keep Albert, what should his new job be?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:08 pm
by Hooligan
Assuming the 'Skins have to keep Fat Albert because of poor trade value and not getting any of their money back, what do you think the team should do with him? Ideally, his new job should suck so badly he will actually consider forfeiting millions to "retire."

If he has to take up a roster spot, I suggest special teams only. Make the fool (try to) sprint up and down the field constantly.

Otherwise, I say stick a giant indian headdress on him, give him a little plastic tomahawk, and let him parade around with the cheerleaders.


What else?

Re: If we keep Albert, what should his new job be?

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:42 pm
by yupchagee
Hooligan wrote:Assuming the 'Skins have to keep Fat Albert because of poor trade value and not getting any of their money back, what do you think the team should do with him? Ideally, his new job should suck so badly he will actually consider forfeiting millions to "retire."

If he has to take up a roster spot, I suggest special teams only. Make the fool (try to) sprint up and down the field constantly.

Otherwise, I say stick a giant indian headdress on him, give him a little plastic tomahawk, and let him parade around with the cheerleaders.


What else?



water boy. He could carry more water than anyone else.

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:34 pm
by Scottskins
nose tackle, and if he doesn't try, then he needs to be at every game in street closed because he is inactive...

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 7:13 pm
by The Hogster
Depends on what he does when he shows up for work. If he does a mea culpa to his teammates and actually is willing to play football with some form of effort, then play him however the coaches planned, at NT and DE.

If he comes in and gives a half a$$ attempt at everything, doesn't do his assignment etc. Then you follow protocol, 1) warn him 2) suspend him 3) file grievance to recoup money.

Charley Casserly agrees with this line of thinking too.

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 8:45 pm
by Punu
You know we could use him in a few positions, but screw it... he has no respect, I hope he never plays another down for the Skins again

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:04 pm
by CanesSkins26
Scottskins wrote:nose tackle, and if he doesn't try, then he needs to be at every game in street closed because he is inactive...


Defense end. He has no business being a NT. The guy is a disruptive force on the line, you don't waste that by having him occupy blockers.

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:02 am
by ATX_Skins
See if BP is willing to buy out the remainder of the contract in another effort to plug the pipe.

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:11 am
by tribeofjudah
put him on the practice squad....that'll teach him.

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:03 am
by Manchester_Redskin
He needs to be used in a system that he is very familiar with and which he had lots and lots of experience of last year ...

put him in charge of handling the oxygen tanks

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:06 am
by Punu
tribeofjudah wrote:put him on the practice squad....that'll teach him.


that would be hilarious

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:40 am
by The Hogster
Since we are supposed to be running a hybrid version of the 3-4 and 4-3 defenses, put him as a backup Defensive Tackle and only send him in during the 4-3 packages.

You would think that would satisfy him since he "only wants to play in a 4-3". Let him sit for 80 percent of the plays when we're in thirty four and play in the scheme he wants.

I don't think the Inside Backers would trust him in front of them now anyway. I could hear the announcers now. :lol:

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:28 pm
by yupchagee
ATX_Skins wrote:See if BP is willing to buy out the remainder of the contract in another effort to plug the pipe.


Are you suggesting that they try another "junk shot"?

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:58 am
by VetSkinsFan
The Hogster wrote:Since we are supposed to be running a hybrid version of the 3-4 and 4-3 defenses, put him as a backup Defensive Tackle and only send him in during the 4-3 packages.

You would think that would satisfy him since he "only wants to play in a 4-3". Let him sit for 80 percent of the plays when we're in thirty four and play in the scheme he wants.

I don't think the Inside Backers would trust him in front of them now anyway. I could hear the announcers now. :lol:


I imagine this would help limit his incentives in his contract, too, thereby saving money.

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:36 am
by ATX_Skins
yupchagee wrote:
ATX_Skins wrote:See if BP is willing to buy out the remainder of the contract in another effort to plug the pipe.


Are you suggesting that they try another "junk shot"?


True, he probably woudn't show the day of.

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:16 am
by Andy614
We could use him to pick up the wet towles in the locker room. That's as close as he deserves to being a Redskin.

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:45 am
by PulpExposure
Andy614 wrote:We could use him to pick up the wet towles in the locker room. That's as close as he deserves to being a Redskin.


I'd send him out to pick up hamburgers for the team for lunch. You know he's good at that...

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:49 am
by The Hogster
PulpExposure wrote:
Andy614 wrote:We could use him to pick up the wet towles in the locker room. That's as close as he deserves to being a Redskin.


I'd send him out to pick up hamburgers for the team for lunch. You know he's good at that...


The fox guarding the hen house. lol Maybe we can make him run 10 100s for every burger he eats before getting back.

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:46 pm
by yupchagee
PulpExposure wrote:
Andy614 wrote:We could use him to pick up the wet towles in the locker room. That's as close as he deserves to being a Redskin.


I'd send him out to pick up hamburgers for the team for lunch. You know he's good at that...


What are the odds that any of the burgers would actually make it back uneaten?