The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Ok....who would you pick on your team? I'm a big fan of Wayne, though he was always under-rated. He was clutch in most games.

I know Welker is a beast of a slot receiver.... and we know what he has done in NE.


But I would pick Chrebet....... little know college, undrafted (I think) and make some fantastic highlight reels.

I hope my not comparing apples to oranges here....

Reasonable comparison.

Welker... he contributed significantly to championship teams.

ok, good point on the championship.. I'd like to see some stats too.

I'm sure someone here is savvy with that.....

Just by name recognition, I'd say Welker. The little guy is like a greased eel...he just can't be covered.

Wayne was a monster but if my memory is right I think he was the #1 WR? Welker to me is just a stud though, dag.. who the heck is better.. I'd say Wes only because of recency

langleyparkjoe wrote:Wayne was a monster but if my memory is right I think he was the #1 WR? Welker to me is just a stud though, dag.. who the heck is better.. I'd say Wes only because of recency

If we're talking about Reggie Wayne he was #2 for the majority of his career behind Harrison. Easily the best tandem this decade IMO.

VetSkinsFan wrote:

langleyparkjoe wrote:Wayne was a monster but if my memory is right I think he was the #1 WR? Welker to me is just a stud though, dag.. who the heck is better.. I'd say Wes only because of recency

If we're talking about Reggie Wayne he was #2 for the majority of his career behind Harrison. Easily the best tandem this decade IMO.

Oh naw, Chrebet.. Wayne Chrebet

VetSkinsFan wrote:

langleyparkjoe wrote:Wayne was a monster but if my memory is right I think he was the #1 WR? Welker to me is just a stud though, dag.. who the heck is better.. I'd say Wes only because of recency

If we're talking about Reggie Wayne he was #2 for the majority of his career behind Harrison. Easily the best tandem this decade IMO.

I agree though but what about Bruce and Holt w/Rams?

Vet, he's talking about Wayne Chrebet...

And, thinking about the topic, it's just very difficult to put one on top... while Welker has rings (and can say that his contributions were a big part of getting them), I suddenly realized that Chrebet made his rep while playing for Rich Kotite... That's no small handicap.

I don't really think you could go wrong with either one.

Countertrey wrote:Vet, he's talking about Wayne Chrebet...

And, thinking about the topic, it's just very difficult to put one on top... while Welker has rings (and can say that his contributions were a big part of getting them), I suddenly realized that Chrebet made his rep while playing for Rich Kotite... That's no small handicap.

I don't really think you could go wrong with either one.

My bad, referred to one guy by first name and one by last, that's where I got the Reggie Wayne association.

<goes back in to his dungeon>

VetSkinsFan wrote:

langleyparkjoe wrote:Wayne was a monster but if my memory is right I think he was the #1 WR? Welker to me is just a stud though, dag.. who the heck is better.. I'd say Wes only because of recency

If we're talking about Reggie Wayne he was #2 for the majority of his career behind Harrison. Easily the best tandem this decade IMO.

NO....Wayne Chrebet....

This is the "battle" of the little guys..........hehehehe

Chrebet or Welker.....???

Welker by a mile. Chrebet was a good player for sure. Welker if he continues the pace he is currently on will be in the hall of fame.