Page 1 of 1
The trenches
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:11 am
by mastdark81
We just recently signed Vonnie Holliday. Didnt' even know he still played in the league. We have signed about 50 defensive lineman for tryouts and I don't mind it but why are we still ignoring the o-line? Wouldn't hurt to bring some OT's in if we doing the same with the defensive side.
Doesn't make sense to me. Our depth is still suspect there and I still feel a sudden shift to the 3-4 has caused more harm in the short term, especially if you are not trading guys like Jarmon/A.Carter
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:03 am
by riggofan
I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 2:29 pm
by ATX_Skins
riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
I second the second sentance to the second power.
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 3:47 pm
by chiefhog44
ATX_Skins wrote:riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
I second the second sentance to the second power.
I third the second to the third, double stamp the triple stamp
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 3:51 pm
by mastdark81
chiefhog44 wrote:ATX_Skins wrote:riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
I second the second sentance to the second power.
I third the second to the third, double stamp the triple stamp
And I agree but thats my point...the defensive line guys they are bringing in are mostly bums! What I'm saying is, if you going to sign some bums go with the oline bums in the league. Thats our weakness.
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 5:13 pm
by RagingRigginz
chiefhog44 wrote:ATX_Skins wrote:riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
I second the second sentance to the second power.
I third the second to the third, double stamp the triple stamp
You can't triple stamp a double stamp, Lloyd.
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 5:55 pm
by frankcal20
If you tripled a double stamp, wouldn't that be a sextuple?
reference:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 817AA1zLvZ
Posted: Mon May 17, 2010 9:22 pm
by yupchagee
riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
We have 15 OL's signed. The problem isn't quantity.
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 8:11 am
by mastdark81
yupchagee wrote:riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
We have 15 OL's signed. The problem isn't quantity.
I think we should bring Levi Jones in, other then Samuels he was our best OT last year.
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 9:38 pm
by chiefhog44
That's what she said...bu dum dum ......psssh
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:05 pm
by Fios
yupchagee wrote:riggofan wrote:I don't see what signing defensive linemen has to do with signing offensive linemen. If there were some guys worth looking at on the o-line, I'm sure the Skins would try to bring them in.
We have 15 OL's signed. The problem isn't quantity.
