Page 1 of 1
OL Campbell from MD
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:29 pm
by fredp45
The guy has made some serious cash his first day at the Combine.
WOW -- he is a stud athlete. Running like a TE. His bench press was very impressive for someone 6'7". His high jump was scary.
Not sure all that translates into stud LOT for 10 years...but the guy has made the most of this "interview."
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 12:33 pm
by frankcal20
Yeah. He's gonna be a boom or bust guy. As the analyst have said this a.m. he was very inconsistent on the field.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:25 pm
by frankcal20
Trent Williams 4.88 40 time
But did anyone see Okungs bench #'s - 39 reps. Thats about 10 more than the other ones proj. in the 1st round.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:12 pm
by fredp45
Except for Campbell who had 34 reps and is 6'7"! That's pushing 225 lbs -- 34 times, a long way -- nearly 3 feet!
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:29 pm
by Gibbs4Life
No more Terps please. Stephon Heyer anyone?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:51 pm
by frankcal20
Gibbs4Life wrote:No more Terps please. Stephon Heyer anyone?
Heyer was just an UFA. Just b/c he played at MD doesn't mean that Campbell can't play. He's not my fav. but he's got talent.
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 6:40 pm
by fredp45
I didn't mention him because I wanted us to draft him, I think Okung is a safer pick. I'd be fine if traded down and got Campbell though.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:15 am
by CanesSkins26
I want no part of Campbell. He's super inconsistent and doesn't come from a good program so he is going to need to be coached up quite a bit. Not worth a first round pick.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:11 pm
by frankcal20
Yeah. I agree canes but if you could get him in the 2nd round - then there is some value there because you've either got a starting RT or quality backup LT. Of course you want a starter in the 2nd round but that's just me.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:34 pm
by chiefhog44
I'm glad to come on here from chicago and see that you guys are not in love with guy because he's from MD. I've seen his video and he seems to be very inconsistant. Seems stiff on pass pro
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:21 pm
by frankcal20
I think if you have a very good team with good talent and maybe an older tackle who is going to retire soon, he may be a good pickup if you can afford the luxury of that scenario.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:28 pm
by chiefhog44
frankcal20 wrote:I think if you have a very good team with good talent and maybe an older tackle who is going to retire soon, he may be a good pickup if you can afford the luxury of that scenario.
Agreed. Think Seattle with Walter Jones would be a great fit
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:40 pm
by frankcal20
Perfect fit actually or Minnesota.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:55 pm
by yupchagee
frankcal20 wrote:Yeah. I agree canes but if you could get him in the 2nd round - then there is some value there because you've either got a starting RT or quality backup LT. Of course you want a starter in the 2nd round but that's just me.
He'll be long, long gone by the 2nd tound. His workout #'s will get him picked early, probably top 10.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm
by CanesSkins26
yupchagee wrote:frankcal20 wrote:Yeah. I agree canes but if you could get him in the 2nd round - then there is some value there because you've either got a starting RT or quality backup LT. Of course you want a starter in the 2nd round but that's just me.
He'll be long, long gone by the 2nd tound. His workout #'s will get him picked early, probably top 10.
Campbell is not going in the top 10. Way too much of a project to be taken that high. He'll likely go towards the end of the 1st.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:57 pm
by yupchagee
CanesSkins26 wrote:yupchagee wrote:frankcal20 wrote:Yeah. I agree canes but if you could get him in the 2nd round - then there is some value there because you've either got a starting RT or quality backup LT. Of course you want a starter in the 2nd round but that's just me.
He'll be long, long gone by the 2nd tound. His workout #'s will get him picked early, probably top 10.
Campbell is not going in the top 10. Way too much of a project to be taken that high. He'll likely go towards the end of the 1st.
You're forgetting that Al Davis picks #8.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:08 pm
by CanesSkins26
yupchagee wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:yupchagee wrote:frankcal20 wrote:Yeah. I agree canes but if you could get him in the 2nd round - then there is some value there because you've either got a starting RT or quality backup LT. Of course you want a starter in the 2nd round but that's just me.
He'll be long, long gone by the 2nd tound. His workout #'s will get him picked early, probably top 10.
Campbell is not going in the top 10. Way too much of a project to be taken that high. He'll likely go towards the end of the 1st.
You're forgetting that Al Davis picks #8.
Campbell doesn't run a sub 4.4 40 so that automatically excludes him from consideration by the Raiders
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:41 am
by HEROHAMO
I am really not that impressed. Only because I have watched plenty of film on him. Campbell has talent and plenty of potential. He has just not put it all together yet. With our number four pick it would be far too risky to take Campbell.
If we take Oline at no.4 then it has to Okung. Okung is the only one that clearly shows he is ready. The rest of the tackles are projects with something to work on.
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:40 pm
by frankcal20
I don't think anyone thinks that you take Campbell over Okung. Campbell is valued at a 2nd round pick. There will be someone in the late first who may feel they can coach him up but I want a guy who may not look the part but plays the part more. And Campbell is opposite that. But, with a little coaching, and for the right price, he has a very high upside.