Page 1 of 1
Redskins' Offense is "Plain and Simple"
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:36 am
by CanesSkins26
6. Redskins turmoil: The anti-Eagles offense is the Redskins, which looks to be aging and regressing. A defensive coach from another team who played -- and studied -- the Redskins this season said Washington's offense is plain and simple. The coach said tight end Chris
ey is the team's biggest offensive threat, and Washington doesn't use him as much as it should. The coach wondered about the condition of running back Clinton Portis, who has not gotten along well with head coach Jim Zorn. The coach wondered about the reasoning for some of the Redskins' play calls, which probably helps to explain why the team felt it needed to hire offensive consultant Sherman Lewis two weeks ago. None of this is overly surprising to anyone who has watched, but it's more evidence that the Redskins soon will be undergoing repairs.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=schefter_adam&id=4563132
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:38 am
by frankcal20
hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:27 pm
by TincoSkin
frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
is that because he is a non-factor?
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:32 pm
by HitDoctor
TincoSkin wrote:frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
is that because he is a non-factor?
you would be correct!!!
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:53 pm
by markshark84
frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
Yeah, but I think it is really really sad when they say our best offensive threat is a TE. I don't think they had to mention JC.
Yes he is a non-factor. He will not contribute.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:53 pm
by skinsfan#33
frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
No one wants to speek about the 800 pund gorila in the room. They didn't mention him or the OL.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:56 pm
by skinsfan#33
markshark84 wrote:frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
Yeah, but I think it is really really sad when they say our best offensive threat is a TE. I don't think they had to mention JC.
Yes he is a non-factor. He will not contribute.
MS84,
What a great way of describing the issue that is JC!
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:07 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
NEWS FLASH!! LMAO My non redskin fan friends can predict our plays, no lie.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:50 pm
by VetSkinsFan
markshark84 wrote:frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
Yeah, but I think it is really really sad when they say our best offensive threat is a TE. I don't think they had to mention JC.
Yes he is a non-factor. He will not contribute.
There's nothing wrong with using an elite TE to catch 800+yds. That means that there are few in the secondary that can cover him. It's called a mismatch, and that's what you're ALWAYS looking for in the passing game.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:23 pm
by SkinsJock
VetSkinsFan wrote:markshark84 wrote:frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
Yeah, but I think it is really really sad when they say our best offensive threat is a TE. I don't think they had to mention JC.
Yes he is a non-factor. He will not contribute.
There's nothing wrong with using an elite TE to catch 800+yds. That means that there are few in the secondary that can cover him. It's called a mismatch, and that's what you're ALWAYS looking for in the passing game.
LMAO - you would think after the last 4 games we would have looked a little better on offense
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:57 pm
by Champsturf
VetSkinsFan wrote:markshark84 wrote:frankcal20 wrote:hmmmm....no mention of Jason Campbell. That's encouraging.
Yeah, but I think it is really really sad when they say our best offensive threat is a TE. I don't think they had to mention JC.
Yes he is a non-factor. He will not contribute.
There's nothing wrong with using an elite TE to catch 800+yds. That means that there are few in the secondary that can cover him. It's called a mismatch, and that's what you're ALWAYS looking for in the passing game.
It's just too bad neither Zorn or Campbell LOOK for anything but dump offs and plays short of the markers...