Page 1 of 1
Chase Daniel Placed On Waivers / Team Wants Him On PS
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:23 pm
by Jake
News so far: I'm on waivers for the time being, was told they want me back if I clear waivers for practice squad...I'll know for sure tom
http://twitter.com/chasedaniel
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:18 pm
by ArlingtonSkinsFan
I know the final roster is due in to the league by 6pm tonight. Does that mean those decisions will be made public (will we know by 6pm who made the roster)?
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:31 pm
by ChocolateMilk
ArlingtonSkinsFan wrote:I know the final roster is due in to the league by 6pm tonight. Does that mean those decisions will be made public (will we know by 6pm who made the roster)?
I'm not sure but I hope so... Ha the anticipation is killing me!
Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 3:34 pm
by ArlingtonSkinsFan
ChocolateMilk wrote:ArlingtonSkinsFan wrote:I know the final roster is due in to the league by 6pm tonight. Does that mean those decisions will be made public (will we know by 6pm who made the roster)?
I'm not sure but I hope so... Ha the anticipation is killing me!
I know I feel pathetic for being so anxious about final cuts but there are a lot of tough decisions this year as compared to the last few seasons. I have a feeling with just two QBs on the roster we will keep four running backs. I think we keep either Alridge or Mason, and cut Dorsey. Also, Henson and D. Young will stay.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:27 am
by Sir_Monk
How long does it take a player to clear waivers in the NFL?
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:50 am
by Jake
Sir_Monk wrote:How long does it take a player to clear waivers in the NFL?
24 hours.
Re: Chase Daniel Placed On Waivers / Team Wants Him On PS
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:40 pm
by crazyhorse1
Jake wrote:News so far: I'm on waivers for the time being, was told they want me back if I clear waivers for practice squad...I'll know for sure tom
http://twitter.com/chasedaniel
Cutting to the chase: I think the Skins did a great job with their cuts, except this one. We're going to regret losing this guy. I'm at least half way sure we'll lose him and be haunted by it and that Colt will never help us.
Re: Chase Daniel Placed On Waivers / Team Wants Him On PS
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:22 pm
by Deadskins
crazyhorse1 wrote:Jake wrote:News so far: I'm on waivers for the time being, was told they want me back if I clear waivers for practice squad...I'll know for sure tom
http://twitter.com/chasedaniel
Cutting to the chase: I think the Skins did a great job with their cuts, except this one. We're going to regret losing this guy. I'm at least half way sure we'll lose him and be haunted by it and that Colt will never help us.
Colt's on IR; he doesn't cost us anything to keep around. They will probably wind up giving him an injury settlement, and parting ways anyhow. How long would you hang on to a guy with two bad hips? They feel that Chase will make it through waivers, and they really wanted to use his roster spot to protect some other prospects. It may come back to haunt them, but it may prove to be an excellent strategy as well. Only time will tell.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:53 pm
by frankcal20
looking good for us as of now. Not to many teams looking for a 5'9 QB.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:18 pm
by Silverfox
frankcal20 wrote:looking good for us as of now. Not to many teams looking for a 5'9 QB.
I believe NO has picked up Chase, according to a msg on WARPATH from a Jason La Canfora tweet.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:23 pm
by SkinsJock
If any of the guys that know football think Chase has any potential after what they saw during the last few weeks then he will be picked up by someone
I don't know much about the QBs in the NFL but there is no way this guy doesn't make someone's roster - the only reason we had to let him go is because we cannot afford to keep both he and Colt.
be interesting to look back in a few years and say well, we had Campbell, Collins and Brennan, why would you keep Daniels around

Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:27 pm
by Deadskins
SkinsJock* wrote:the only reason we had to let him go is because we cannot afford to keep both he and Colt.
Colt went on IR. Someone else took Chase's spot. We gambled (and lost) he would make it through waivers.
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:42 pm
by SkinsJock
Deadskins wrote:SkinsJock wrote:Colt went on IR. Someone else took Chase's spot. We gambled (and lost) he would make it through waivers.
I agree that we lost - not a good decision in my humble opinion - but we have a habit of making decisions like this, don't we?
