Page 1 of 1
Titans accuse Redskins of tampering
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:47 pm
by MakeRomoCry
I don't have a link yet, but ESPN radio is reporting that the Tennessee Titans are looking into filing tampering charges with the Redskins deal involving Albert Haynesworth.
If I'm not mistaken, if a team is convicted of tampering this could mean fines and docked draft picks.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:52 pm
by dad23hogjrs
as stated in the Haynesworth thread, somewhere along the way:
- they can't prove it
- AH and his agent said all along they were going to test the market
- The Titans offer was never close to the six teams that reportedly "started the bidding at 12:01 Friday Morning"
This will be another source for writers like Peter King to mail in an excuse for an actuall cloumn by babblingly bashing the skins for a paragraph or two, the same for the raiders, say how great the Pats are, and how great the Chiefs will be because Pioli is there, and then he can go back to drinking coffee on his couch and cash his latest paycheck for doing nothing
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:09 pm
by MakeRomoCry
dad23hogjrs wrote:This will be another source for writers like Peter King to mail in an excuse for an actuall cloumn by babblingly bashing the skins for a paragraph or two, the same for the raiders, say how great the Pats are, and how great the Chiefs will be because Pioli is there, and then he can go back to drinking coffee on his couch and cash his latest paycheck for doing nothing
I couldnt agree more. Regardless of what happenes this will allow all of the 'Skins haters to come out of the woodwork to take their shots.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:55 pm
by Irn-Bru
According to the timeline, the Redskins were bidding for Haynesworth, then were out of the bidding on Friday night, before getting back into it. Doesn't sound like they had anything wrapped up ahead of time.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:26 pm
by jeremyroyce
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:02 pm
by brad7686
Asked if the Redskins tampered, Haynesworth said: "I don't think so. Yeah, Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the combine, but they were talking about Malcolm and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that.
Malcolm Kelly? I'll be happy if he just plays a whole season.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:11 pm
by CanesSkins26
brad7686 wrote:Asked if the Redskins tampered, Haynesworth said: "I don't think so. Yeah, Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the combine, but they were talking about Malcolm and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that.
Malcolm Kelly? I'll be happy if he just plays a whole season.
Comparing Kelly to Andre Johnson is a joke.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:24 pm
by Countertrey
CanesSkins26 wrote:brad7686 wrote:Asked if the Redskins tampered, Haynesworth said: "I don't think so. Yeah, Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the combine, but they were talking about Malcolm and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that.
Malcolm Kelly? I'll be happy if he just plays a whole season.
Comparing Kelly to Andre Johnson is a joke.
Feel free to begin a "Malcolm Kelly not Andre Johnson" thread... We now return to our regularly scheduled thread, "Titans accuse Redskins"...
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:05 pm
by redskins14ru
so tampering is starting to early sombody give me a hint there.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:26 pm
by jeremyroyce
brad7686 wrote:Asked if the Redskins tampered, Haynesworth said: "I don't think so. Yeah, Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the combine, but they were talking about Malcolm and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that.
Malcolm Kelly? I'll be happy if he just plays a whole season.[/quote
Lets give the guy a chance.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:30 pm
by brad7686
jeremyroyce wrote:brad7686 wrote:Asked if the Redskins tampered, Haynesworth said: "I don't think so. Yeah, Chad told me he met with the Redskins at the combine, but they were talking about Malcolm and how he could become the next Andre Johnson and stuff like that.
Malcolm Kelly? I'll be happy if he just plays a whole season.
Lets give the guy a chance.
I'm not knocking the guy, but i think he needs to make it onto some grass somewhere before people start comparing him to a top 3 WR.
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:34 pm
by redskins14ru
Irn-Bru wrote:According to the timeline, the Redskins were bidding for Haynesworth, then were out of the bidding on Friday night, before getting back into it. Doesn't sound like they had anything wrapped up ahead of time.
looks like the titans drawed strawed and the short one had to report tampering. Just another publicity stunt. In an other wise meaningful offseason. I sure hopr the skins could make haynesworth roll on offenses like the Titans did. I don't believe vinny and tose FO guys would ever dream of cheetin like that though.....
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:10 am
by riggofan
This whole thing is such a joke. How many FAs signed within the first few hours of free agency? We're supposed to believe these players weren't talking early?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:05 pm
by langleyparkjoe
dear titans.. tamper DEEZ!
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:07 pm
by tribeofjudah
langleyparkjoe wrote:dear titans.. tamper DEEZ!
Oh yes.....Pleez.......
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:27 am
by Gibbs4Life
My friend the titans fan was all too happy to hear they might get a draft pick, he is soo bitter about us getting haynesworth. First thing he did was send me 3 pages of texts calling daniel snyder a dumba$$ then he started telling me albert will get injured and then he was saying that the Titans didn't want haynesworth back, like they just showed him the door.