One thing to remember is that the tackles, while they are important, are not the primary run stoppers. They are to engage the big OLmen and open gaps for LBs to run through to get the runner or prevent the OL from opening gaps forcing the HB to the outside for the faster DEs and LBs to maul them. That was one of the things Grant and Butz were famous for - not storming the backfield and making tackles but jamming opposing backs up for our ::ahem:: "mediocre" linebackers of the 80's to take 'em down.
The two starting DTs for New Orleans, Grady Jackson and Norman Hand had 43 and 39 tackles respecively. Their LBs and safeties had twice as much or more. And in order to illustrate my point from above, their two DEs had half again as many tackles.
My point is simply that while this guy may be a backup, he has progressively gotten more play behind two good DTs as part of a rotation having 19 tackles, 11 assists and 2 stuffs being a third or fourth DT. To me, that shows he at least may bring some promise to the table.
The only other thing is when you are playing a NT and a blitzer like they are planning under Edwards defensive scheme, you will get burnt from the run sometimes. (Not all the time like we did against the panthers, but sometimes.)
I expect to see better things from the Skins when they stop the shuffling, play all the starters, which they haven't yet, settle on who is playing what situations and start playing the real playbook instead of "run left" "run right" defensive schemes. As an ex LB/RB, I know a little about defenses and they are running a defense so bland right now that I would say vanilla would be too descriptive.
I hope I am right and you are wrong Jake, but not for any other reason than we stop the run better.
