Page 1 of 1

Lebron James + cover of Vogue = Racism?

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:39 am
by Cappster
LeBron James Vogue cover criticized

By MEGAN K. SCOTT, Associated Press Writer Mar 24, 7:18 pm EDT

NEW YORK - When Vogue announced its April cover starring LeBron James and Gisele Bundchen, the magazine noted with some fanfare that James was the first black man to grace its cover.

But the image is stirring up controversy, with some commentators decrying the photo as perpetuating racial stereotypes. James strikes what some see as a gorilla-like pose, baring his teeth, with one hand dribbling a ball and the other around Bundchen’s tiny waist.

It’s an image some have likened to “King Kong” and Fay Wray.

“It conjures up this idea of a dangerous black man,” said Tamara Walker, 29, of Philadelphia.

Photographer Annie Leibovitz shot the 6-foot-9 NBA star and the 5-foot-11 Brazilian model for the cover and an inside spread. Vogue spokesman Patrick O’Connell said the magazine “sought to celebrate two superstars at the top of their game” for the magazine’s annual issue devoted to size and shape.

“We think Lebron James and Gisele Bundchen look beautiful together and we are honored to have them on the cover,” he said.

James told The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer he was pleased with the cover, saying he was “just showing a little emotion.”

“Everything my name is on is going to be criticized in a good way or bad way,” James told the paper. “Who cares what anyone says?”

But magazine analyst Samir Husni believes the photo was deliberately provocative, adding that it “screams King Kong.” Considering Vogue’s influential history, he said, covers are not something that the magazine does in a rush.

“So when you have a cover that reminds people of King Kong and brings those stereotypes to the front, black man wanting white woman, it’s not innocent,” he said.

O’Connell, the Vogue spokesman, declined further comment.

In a column at ESPN.com, Jemele Hill called the cover “memorable for all the wrong reasons.” But she said in an interview that the image is not unusual — white athletes are generally portrayed smiling or laughing, while black sports figures are given a “beastly sort of vibe.”

For example, former NBA star Charles Barkley was depicted breaking free of neck and wrist shackles on the cover of Sports Illustrated. Dennis Rodman graced the cover of Rolling Stone with horns poking out of his forehead and his red tongue hanging out.

Images of black male athletes as aggressive and threatening “reinforce the criminalization of black men,” said Damion Thomas, assistant professor in the Department of Kinesiology at University of Maryland.

But others say the image show James’ game face — nothing more. And they note that Bundchen hardly looks frightened.

“James is a huge, black beautiful masculine statue and Gisele is a feminine, sexy gorgeous doll,” said Christa Thomas, 36, a black account supervisor in Los Angeles.

“I didn’t see any kind of racist overtone to it,” she said. “I still don’t. I think there is such a hypersensitivity to race still in this country.”

Husni said it is too soon to know how the magazine is selling, though the controversy could increase sales as people rush out to get a “collector’s edition.”

If nothing else, Walker said the cover underscores the need for a more diverse workplace.

“If more people of color worked for Vogue in positions of editorial authority, perhaps someone in the room might have been able to read the image the way so many of us are reading it now, and had the power to do something about it,” she said.


http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=a ... &type=lgns

:roll: :roll: Here we go again. *sigh* Some people in this country just want to see racism. I never once thought, when I looked James on the cover of Vogue, that he looked like King Kong. Get over it already! It is situations like this that keep this country from moving forward. I believe some idiots are way to oversensitive when it comes to race. This is my plea to everyone. Let go of the past!

Slavery was a long time ago. In fact, across the entire world, many nations have been enslaved at one time or another. Many nations have had to fight for civil rights. Get over it! If we, as a nation, can just see people for who they are, we wouldn't have this problem.

Maybe I am a little well versed in accepting people for who they are and not for the pigmentation of their skin. I am white and my girlfriend is black. I date her for who she is and not because I feel as though I have power over her or some other idiotic reason. When I see articles like the one above, it really gets to me, because I don't look for racism therefore I do not see it.

I can look at a cloud and see mashed potatoes or I can see that cloud for what it is. A cloud. I can look at the picture Lebron James and Giselle and see King Kong holding the tiny woman he stole from the apartment or not even realize Lebron is in the picture, because I am too busy looking at Giselle. A woman might see Lebron and not even notice Giselle. Then you have the retards that see a monkey holding a banana.

I am not saying racism doesn't exist. I am saying that racism will only die if each and every one of us chooses to know people by name and not by color.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:04 am
by GSPODS
Did Al Sharpton have anything to do with this? It smells like his handywork.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:21 am
by Cappster
GSPODS wrote:Did Al Sharpton have anything to do with this? It smells like his handywork.


I haven't heard anything from him yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if that jackass didn't show up sooner or later.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:43 am
by GSPODS
James agreed to both the photo and the specific pose. I'm sure he was paid for his services. How can accepting payment for the photo be construed as racism?

I'd say that legally this is a non-argument. Anyone wanting to turn this into a racial issue should be questioning James', and possibly, Bundchen's willingness to do the shoot for money.

Furthermore, the name of the magazine is "Vogue". As in, strike a pose. I doubt the magazine wants a picture of anyone, James or otherwise, that does not fit the title of their publication.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:00 pm
by VetSkinsFan
It's just ignorance at its best IMO. Would there be any issue if that was Tyra Banks as opposed to Giselle? I would be my check on, "No." As stated above, if you address the person, there is no race. We're all Americans here.....

Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:03 am
by HEROHAMO
I am a colored man myself.

But, this notion that this is somehow racist is ridiculous. Come on people how many people have the privelage of being on GQ magazine? I would kill to get that cover spot. Lebron is a fierce athlete and should be shown as such. I have no prob at all with this.

THere have been black guys on the cover who were shown in the model type way. Tyson Beckford, Michael Jordan, Denzel Washington! COme on these idiot writers are just trying to get some attention.