Page 1 of 1
Larry Fitzgerald & The Cards
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:28 am
by SkinsFreak
John Clayton reported this morning that the Cardinals are struggling to re-sign Larry Fitzgerald, simply due to the fact that they have no cap space to re-sign him long term.
Clayton went on to report that Arizona currently only has 51 players on their active roster which only includes 16 players on defense. Clayton added, due to their limited cap space, it will be difficult to fill out a complete roaster, and at this point, the Cardinals couldn't even field a complete team.
Cardinals Team Roster Page
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:44 am
by GSPODS
Was that Redskins1 I just heard starting up?
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:36 pm
by GSPODS
A report surfaced Friday that the Eagles made an offer to obtain Larry Fitzgerald.
With the Cardinals and Fitzgerald at an impasse in contract negotiations, the Eagles reportedly offered CB Lito Sheppard and WR Reggie Brown as trade bait. League sources confirmed the offer, but wouldn't confirm details. The Cardinals adamantly maintain that Fitzgerald will remain in Arizona.
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:40 pm
by GSPODS
Larry Fitzgerald and his agent are looking for a four-year deal worth between $25 and $30 million in guaranteed money to restructure his contract.
The Cardinals are looking for a six-year deal for the same amount. Fitz and his agent are angling for the 24-year-old to be eligible for one more giant contract before the age of thirty. Arizona got themselves in this mess by negotiating a terrible contract to begin with.
Re: Larry Fitzgerald & The Cards
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:46 pm
by 1niksder
SkinsFreak wrote:John Clayton reported this morning that the Cardinals are struggling to re-sign Larry Fitzgerald, simply due to the fact that they have no cap space to re-sign him long term.
Clayton went on to report that Arizona currently only has 51 players on their active roster which only includes 16 players on defense. Clayton added, due to their limited cap space, it will be difficult to fill out a complete roaster, and at this point, the Cardinals couldn't even field a complete team.
Cardinals Team Roster Page
They already have him under contract, re-signing him isn't the problem. He's happy with the deal he has it's the Cards that have a problem.
Fitz is due $15-$17M the next two years on his current deal (that's not a price range, it's $15M in 08 and $17 in 09

). The Cards wanted to re-work the deal, Fitz said OK give me $30M guaranteed as part of a 4 year deal.
Fitzgerald is the reason they have no cap space.
Before anyone says the Skins go through the same thing, they don't this maybe a yearly issue whit the Skins durning the months of Jan. and Feb. but it's never rolled into Free Agency.
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:50 pm
by 1niksder
GSPODS wrote:Larry Fitzgerald and his agent are looking for a four-year deal worth between $25 and $30 million in guaranteed money to restructure his contract.
That's less than what base is the next two years... he's trying to help the team clear cap space

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:58 pm
by GSPODS
1niksder wrote:GSPODS wrote:Larry Fitzgerald and his agent are looking for a four-year deal worth between $25 and $30 million in guaranteed money to restructure his contract.
That's less than what base is the next two years... he's trying to help the team clear cap space

He wants $25 to $30 Million in
guaranteed money to restructure his contract. What does he want in non-guaranteed money and incentives? Another $25 to $30 Million?
Re: Larry Fitzgerald & The Cards
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 1:36 pm
by SkinsFreak
SkinsFreak wrote:Clayton went on to report that Arizona currently only has 51 players on their active roster which only includes 16 players on defense. Clayton added, due to their limited cap space, it will be difficult to fill out a complete roaster, and at this point, the Cardinals couldn't even field a complete team.
Fitz wanting guaranteed money and the Card's limited cap space is only part of the problem. The aforementioned report by Clayton about their roster is what's most baffling. They currently only have 16 defensive players,
16, that's ridiculous. And do to their cap problems that stem from Fitz, and just poor management all around from their front office, they will struggle to have adequate depth. Some criticize the Skins front office and their capology approach, but some other organizations are far more mucked up than we are. Eric Schaffer never seems to get any props, but that man is irreplaceable and definitely earns his money.
Re: Larry Fitzgerald & The Cards
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:17 pm
by 1niksder
SkinsFreak wrote:Fitz wanting guaranteed money and the Card's limited cap space is only part of the problem. The aforementioned report by Clayton about their roster is what's most baffling. They currently only have 16 defensive players, 16, that's ridiculous. And do to their cap problems that stem from Fitz, and just poor management all around from their front office, they will struggle to have adequate depth. Some criticize the Skins front office and their capology approach, but some other organizations are far more mucked up than we are. Eric Schaffer never seems to get any props, but that man is irreplaceable and definitely earns his money.
Fitzgerald didn't ask for this, the escalators in his contract made his base salary jump up to what it is now. If they re-work the deal at his asking price his cap number could be cut in half and free up about $6 or $7 million this year. If they do it the way they want they save $10 million this year.
As far as Schaffer goes he does a great job but owes "the Danny" for all that he knows about the cap. "the Danny" is the only guy that owns a NFL team that thought it was played with monopoly money.
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:10 pm
by SkinsFreak
They have 51 players in total and only 16 on defense. How many players does $10 million buy them? And even if they can get a handful, what talent is there left to be had? I also have to think Edgerrin James' contract is screwing them up as well. Point being, the Cardinals are under horrible management. They also traded up last year to take DT Alan Branch, and in 11 games, only had 8 tackles, 1 assist with no sacks. That's pretty pathetic.
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:17 pm
by joebagadonuts
Whoa. Wait. A challenger to our most honorable 'Laughing Stock' title?!? Someone get me Jeff George's agent on the phone!!!
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:51 pm
by 1niksder
The Eagles are rumored to be offering Lito Shepard and Reggie Brown, which the Cards turned down.
Should we offer a trade of Betts and our 2nd this year and 3rd next year?
I think they would go for it Betts cap hit would be a little over 600K and Fitz's 14.5M would be gone, Letting James go would give them another $5M in cap space and they could go out and get some defensive players.
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:35 pm
by SkinsFreak
1niksder wrote:Should we offer a trade of Betts and our 2nd this year and 3rd next year?

Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:46 pm
by LOSTHOG
1niksder wrote:Should we offer a trade of Betts and our 2nd this year and 3rd next year?
I say pull the trigger.
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:05 pm
by SkinsFreak
This was from a few weeks ago.
Posted: 02/23/2008
Cardinals: Fitzgerald not going anywhere
By Jason Feller | NFL.com
INDIANAPOLIS -- The answer came in loud and clear: Wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald will be an Arizona Cardinal next year.
At the NFL Scouting Combine on Saturday, Cardinals Vice President of Football Operations Rod Graves put to rest any doubts that Fitzgerald would not be in Arizona for the 2008 season.
"No question, no question,” said Graves, when asked if Fitzgerald would be back. “He's a core player, and like so many other players we're excited about with respect to our football team, we are going to do what we have to do to keep that core player.”
The question arose because Fitzgerald is going to count $16 million against the salary cap next season, a hefty sum, even for one of the league’s premier wideouts.
Graves acknowledged that he would like to renegotiate Fitzgerald's original six-year deal, but affirmed that the wide receiver would remain with the team regardless. Fitzgerald has two years remaining on his contract.
"He's earned the right to be where he is," Graves said, adding that he had no problem with the original deal Fitzgerald signed, which included several escalator clauses. “We also determined that when we got to this point, that we would be back at the bargaining table to try to reach a long-term deal that would make it a little bit more palatable for us as an organization, and that's where we are. If we can't, then we'll move forward (with his current contract)."
Fitzgerald, a two-time Pro Bowl selection, caught 100 passes for 1,409 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2007.
It's nice that Graves speaks this way publicly, but Fitz's current contract is crippling, especially for a team with only 16 defensive players. What could they possibly be thinking? As Clayton said, they couldn't even field a complete team right now. If they were to agree to trade Fitz for Betts, a 2nd and a 3rd in 2009, I think you'd make that trade all day long, but I don't really think they'd go for it though.
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:24 pm
by 1niksder
SkinsFreak wrote:This was from a few weeks ago.
Posted: 02/23/2008
Cardinals: Fitzgerald not going anywhere
By Jason Feller | NFL.com
INDIANAPOLIS -- The answer came in loud and clear: Wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald will be an Arizona Cardinal next year.
At the NFL Scouting Combine on Saturday, Cardinals Vice President of Football Operations Rod Graves put to rest any doubts that Fitzgerald would not be in Arizona for the 2008 season.
"No question, no question,” said Graves, when asked if Fitzgerald would be back. “He's a core player, and like so many other players we're excited about with respect to our football team, we are going to do what we have to do to keep that core player.”
This was a few days ago.
Larry Fitzgerald says he doesn't want to leave Arizona. The Cardinals say they don't want him to go.
That, however, is an awful small plot of common ground in negotiations between two sides that seem to agree on little else.
The restructuring of Fitzgerald's contract appears no closer to fruition than it was a month ago, and the rumblings of frustration are growing within the organization.
Without a contract agreement, a day of reckoning is coming for the Cardinals.
They are going to face the prospect of trading Fitzgerald or losing him a year from now, when they might have to cut him rather than pay his 2009 salary of $17.4 million.
So far, both sides are saying all the right things. The Cardinals insist Fitzgerald will play for them in 2008, even at a salary of $14.6 million. Fitzgerald's agent, Eugene Parker, said team officials have reassured him that Fitzgerald is going nowhere, even if a new deal isn't reached.
That hasn't prevented other teams from trying to trade for him. The Eagles have talked to the Cardinals about acquiring Fitzgerald, with cornerback Lito Sheppard and receiver Reggie Brown rumored to be part of the offer.
The Cardinals have little interest in either player, and they are not eager to part with Fitzgerald, who made two Pro Bowls in his first four seasons.
Sheppard also has been to the Pro Bowl twice, but there are questions about his durability and he's unhappy with his contract. The Cardinals aren't eager to trade for someone else's problem.
It's hard to tell what would pique the Cardinals' interest at this point. Their primary desire is to keep Fitzgerald for several more years, even though that would cost them dearly.
But they've known for years that they could face this situation. It's the price teams pay for picking high in the draft. Fitzgerald was the third overall pick in 2004, and he signed a deal laden with incentives that would pay him handsomely if he became an elite player.
Included in that rookie contract were clauses that would bump his 2008 salary by $10 million should he chosen for two Pro Bowls in his first four years, and by $11 million in 2009 for other achievements.
Those clauses were designed to get the two parties back to the bargaining table after four years. Now, Parker is seeking another four-year deal that would pay Fitzgerald between $25 million and $30 million in guarantees.
Parker's motive is to get Fitzgerald, 24, a third lucrative contract before the receiver turns 30.
The Cardinals would prefer six years at a similar level of guaranteed money, because they abhor the idea of going through all of this again in three or four years.
Fitzgerald holds most of the leverage in negotiations, although the Cardinals are trying to appeal to his professed desire to win.
If Fitzgerald is serious about that, team officials say he should accept a restructuring, creating additional cap space that would allow to team to attract free agents and to keep key players.
Parker won't address the Cardinals cap concerns directly, but Fitzgerald said in a recent radio interview that he doesn't think his present contract prevents the Cardinals from being active in free agency.
The impact of the Fitzgerald situation reverberates throughout the organization. It calls into question Fitzgerald's sincerity and commitment to winning, Rod Graves' acumen as a general manager and owner Bill Bidwill's willingness to write a check with a lot of numbers to the left of the decimal point.
The answers to at least some of those questions will come in the next few weeks.
If we listen to them it doesn't seems as though anything has changed.
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:42 pm
by yupchagee
SkinsFreak wrote:This was from a few weeks ago.
Posted: 02/23/2008
Cardinals: Fitzgerald not going anywhere
By Jason Feller | NFL.com
INDIANAPOLIS -- The answer came in loud and clear: Wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald will be an Arizona Cardinal next year.
At the NFL Scouting Combine on Saturday, Cardinals Vice President of Football Operations Rod Graves put to rest any doubts that Fitzgerald would not be in Arizona for the 2008 season.
"No question, no question,” said Graves, when asked if Fitzgerald would be back. “He's a core player, and like so many other players we're excited about with respect to our football team, we are going to do what we have to do to keep that core player.”
The question arose because Fitzgerald is going to count $16 million against the salary cap next season, a hefty sum, even for one of the league’s premier wideouts.
Graves acknowledged that he would like to renegotiate Fitzgerald's original six-year deal, but affirmed that the wide receiver would remain with the team regardless. Fitzgerald has two years remaining on his contract.
"He's earned the right to be where he is," Graves said, adding that he had no problem with the original deal Fitzgerald signed, which included several escalator clauses. “We also determined that when we got to this point, that we would be back at the bargaining table to try to reach a long-term deal that would make it a little bit more palatable for us as an organization, and that's where we are. If we can't, then we'll move forward (with his current contract)."
Fitzgerald, a two-time Pro Bowl selection, caught 100 passes for 1,409 yards and 10 touchdowns in 2007.
It's nice that Graves speaks this way publicly, but Fitz's current contract is crippling, especially for a team with only 16 defensive players. What could they possibly be thinking? As Clayton said, they couldn't even field a complete team right now. If they were to agree to trade Fitz for Betts, a 2nd and a 3rd in 2009, I think you'd make that trade all day long, but I don't really think they'd go for it though.
If they advertised that they were trying to move him, his trade value would drop.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:07 pm
by SkinsFreak
Hey 1niksder, if the Skins magically pulled off a trade for Fitz, would they be able to fit him in cap wise?
To date, and this could change as the draft approaches, I've been in favor of drafting a WR with our 1st round pick. I also would like a DE, but I'm currently leaning towards a WR. After the top four DE's are gone, I think the next half dozen DE's rank very similar, so a good one could be had in the 2nd.
Let's say, for arguments sake, the Skins want to draft a WR in the 1st. Would they then consider giving up that 1st round pick, along with maybe someone like Betts, for Fitz? Take Fitz with that 1st round pick instead of a rookie like Sweed, Hardy or Kelly? Just a thought, nothing more.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:37 pm
by 1niksder
SkinsFreak wrote:Hey 1niksder, if the Skins magically pulled off a trade for Fitz, would they be able to fit him in cap wise?
To date, and this could change as the draft approaches, I've been in favor of drafting a WR with our 1st round pick. I also would like a DE, but I'm currently leaning towards a WR. After the top four DE's are gone, I think the next half dozen DE's rank very similar, so a good one could be had in the 2nd.
Let's say, for arguments sake, the Skins want to draft a WR in the 1st. Would they then consider giving up that 1st round pick, along with maybe someone like Betts, for Fitz? Take Fitz with that 1st round pick instead of a rookie like Sweed, Hardy or Kelly? Just a thought, nothing more.
If they have to give up the first rounder and a player then they should get at least a third rounder too (I'd ask for a 2nd... again getting Betts would allow them to cut Edge and free up another $5M). To fit him under the cap would be tricky and getting rid of the first pick could help but they'll still need around $2.5 - $3M for the rookie pool and the team sits at around $7.7M now. For argument's sake they would have to re-work another contract (Spring, Washington and Griff could free up about $4M each if needed). right now Fitz is talking 25-30M guaranteed, that's do-able with a six year deal and a split signing bonus (maybe guarantee next years base salary and back the signing bonus and roster bonus for next year bigger than this year's to save space now). Then again that's the same thinking the Cards are working with.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:02 pm
by Jake
I don't understand why they just don't convert his salary into bonuses like we do...
Is that illegal in the west or something?
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:34 pm
by 1niksder
Jake wrote:I don't understand why they just don't convert his salary into bonuses like we do...
Is that illegal in the west or something?
It's what they want to do but they want to spread cap hit over 6 years and LF wants a 4 year deal. $25-28M over rhe next two years is a bargin for the Cards. He doesn'thave to do anything but wait. Either he'll play for his current salary or be cut and get what he wants from 1 of about 20 teams,
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:42 pm
by SkinsFreak
Cards, Fitzgerald agree on deal that frees cap spaceBy John Clayton
ESPN.com
Updated: March 11, 2008, 1:17 PM ET
The Arizona Cardinals and wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald reached agreement on a blockbuster four-year, $40 million contract that will free up much-needed salary cap room for the team.
Fitzgerald announced the deal on his Web site, saying he will make $33 million over the first three years of the contract.
Over the final two years of his old deal, Fitzgerald was scheduled to make $14,592,500 in 2008 and $17,355,000 in 2009. That put the team in a tight cap bind -- with less than $400,000 of cap room remaining -- so signing players was tough until they struck a deal with Fitzgerald.
They had only 48 players on their roster and only 16 players on defense.
The team was trying to find a way to convince Fitzgerald to sign a six-year deal. In the end, Fitzgerald got his way and signed a four-year deal.
Fitzgerald will receive a $15 million signing bonus Tuesday. His base salary will be $2 million, giving him a $17 million payout this year. He has a $5 million option bonus in 2009. Over the four years of his contract, he will receive $30 million in guarantees.
The new deal will save the team $8.842 million in cap room, dropping his salary cap number from $16,485,000 to $7,643,334.
Fitzgerald caught 100 passes for 1,409 yards and 10 touchdowns for the Cardinals last season. In 60 career games over four year seasons, all in Arizona, he has 330 receptions for 4,544 yards -- a 13.8 yards per catch average -- and 34 touchdowns..
Link
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:22 pm
by Jake
1niksder wrote:Jake wrote:I don't understand why they just don't convert his salary into bonuses like we do...
Is that illegal in the west or something?
It's what they want to do but they want to spread cap hit over 6 years and LF wants a 4 year deal. $25-28M over rhe next two years is a bargin for the Cards. He doesn'thave to do anything but wait. Either he'll play for his current salary or be cut and get what he wants from 1 of about 20 teams,
Gotcha. Thanks for clearing that up.