BeeGee's perspective
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:54 pm
I pulled this post out of smack and placed it here because this guy will never under stand the fraud that ttiT really is if we just keep throwing BS back and forth.
You need to correct your perspective on that team in Texas before you start handing out help
You can start by admitting thay got luck in the Bills game, and ttiT is only on life support. The Bills are last in the league or in the bottom three in just about every statisical category out there and you talk about coming back to win. A win is a win but like the Cards game it's nothing to blow your horn about.
Mabe ttiT is is the walking dead, but that just means they're dead and don't know it. We'll correct that next month.
You'll say I'm making excusses but I'm really taking the time to point out somethings other boardmembers may have over looked. These are the facts. Injuries happen but so many on any one part of the team will effect the whole team. The Skins had three lineman go down in Green Bay that effected the following week. Chris Samuels was the only "starter" to practice last week (How do you prepare a game plan like that). They planned for Wade and Heyer to maybe be out but everyone felt Rabach would go. Pucillo replaced Rabach at center but spent all last week practicing at guard and center. Like your team they did what they had to do to get the win. The defense was on the field most of the game and playing with their backs against their goal line as opposed to the 50 yet they held them to under 20 points. How many times have those deadmen held someone under 20. Don't answer that, you'll probably would say something like the Rams (who also have three starting lineman out) or teams lead by guys named Rex or Tarvaris. As teams do our D picked up the slack
Winners
You should have to play someone before you call yourselfs winners, after seven games five of the seven teams you've played have a combined 7 wins. When you get a bunch of loser on the field at the same time someone has to come off victorious. The only teams with winning records that you've played were the Gints and the Pats. The Gints game was a shoot out (so they say) only because they put up 35 on yall (we only gave up 24). We know what happen when you went up against the Pats, I think we have a shot next week but if not I know they won't put up almost 50 on us like they did ttiT
For the record we normally find a way to lose games like that so getting the win isn't something you should be too happy about. Then again the Cards were leading their division before the came to FedEx. It was a one win team you had to "come back from the dead to beat", how about this they've only won one game since giving you that game and it was a team with three missing o-linemen.
You say it wasn't about the Bills being the Bills yet the football world watched the Bills be the Bills Live. The Cards are a team that is trying to move in a new direction and we held them off when we had to. TtiT hasn't played anyone and we gave back two games and are only a a game and a half back after playing a much tougher schedule this far.
Like I said once you get your perspective in order you want be as confussed, Hanging out with fans from ttiT will always cost confusions and lost of perspective so maybe you should just quit while you're behind.
I mean... How many Trolls get a thread outside of Smack
BeeGee wrote:I need to correct your perspective on the Cowboys/Bills as it compares to the Redskins/Cardinals.
You need to correct your perspective on that team in Texas before you start handing out help
BeeGee wrote: The Cowboys came back from the dead, and clawed their way to an almost impossible victory - that's what winners do.
You can start by admitting thay got luck in the Bills game, and ttiT is only on life support. The Bills are last in the league or in the bottom three in just about every statisical category out there and you talk about coming back to win. A win is a win but like the Cards game it's nothing to blow your horn about.
Mabe ttiT is is the walking dead, but that just means they're dead and don't know it. We'll correct that next month.
BeeGee wrote: The Redskins had the Cardinals down and out, only to get completely dominated on both sides of the ball for much of the 2nd half, give up an onsides kick, and pray that the kicker that punked their DB didn't put one right between their eyes and complete the improbable comeback.
You'll say I'm making excusses but I'm really taking the time to point out somethings other boardmembers may have over looked. These are the facts. Injuries happen but so many on any one part of the team will effect the whole team. The Skins had three lineman go down in Green Bay that effected the following week. Chris Samuels was the only "starter" to practice last week (How do you prepare a game plan like that). They planned for Wade and Heyer to maybe be out but everyone felt Rabach would go. Pucillo replaced Rabach at center but spent all last week practicing at guard and center. Like your team they did what they had to do to get the win. The defense was on the field most of the game and playing with their backs against their goal line as opposed to the 50 yet they held them to under 20 points. How many times have those deadmen held someone under 20. Don't answer that, you'll probably would say something like the Rams (who also have three starting lineman out) or teams lead by guys named Rex or Tarvaris. As teams do our D picked up the slack
BeeGee wrote: The Cowboys had control of their fate: make the kick (twice), win the game. Winners win games by making plays and finishing games. Kinda like we shut down Guineasota 17-0 in the 2nd half, with "Rhinoback" (#24) delivering the finishing blows.
Winners
You should have to play someone before you call yourselfs winners, after seven games five of the seven teams you've played have a combined 7 wins. When you get a bunch of loser on the field at the same time someone has to come off victorious. The only teams with winning records that you've played were the Gints and the Pats. The Gints game was a shoot out (so they say) only because they put up 35 on yall (we only gave up 24). We know what happen when you went up against the Pats, I think we have a shot next week but if not I know they won't put up almost 50 on us like they did ttiTBeeGee wrote:The Redskins had no control of their fate: close your eyes, pray that he misses. Losers win games by holding on for dear life and hoping they're not beaten in the end.
For the record we normally find a way to lose games like that so getting the win isn't something you should be too happy about. Then again the Cards were leading their division before the came to FedEx. It was a one win team you had to "come back from the dead to beat", how about this they've only won one game since giving you that game and it was a team with three missing o-linemen.
BeeGee wrote:So it wasn't about the Bills being the Bills, it was about the Cowboys being winners. And in reverse, it wasn't about the Redskins being winners, it was about the Cards being the Cards.
You say it wasn't about the Bills being the Bills yet the football world watched the Bills be the Bills Live. The Cards are a team that is trying to move in a new direction and we held them off when we had to. TtiT hasn't played anyone and we gave back two games and are only a a game and a half back after playing a much tougher schedule this far.
BeeGee wrote:Hope that clears up your confusion
Like I said once you get your perspective in order you want be as confussed, Hanging out with fans from ttiT will always cost confusions and lost of perspective so maybe you should just quit while you're behind.
I mean... How many Trolls get a thread outside of Smack