The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

This is surreal ... wow. I assumed this wasn't recent, it is not ... how did I miss this?

Good Grief. It looked to me like the police officer just wanted to play with his new toy. The officer was like the size of Chris Samuels. I think three officers could have restrained the guy without using a taser.

GSPODS wrote:Good Grief. It looked to me like the police officer just wanted to play with his new toy. The officer was like the size of Chris Samuels. I think three officers could have restrained the guy without using a taser.

dude there was like 5 on him... plus the girl pointing at his face..

Didn't you know it's illegal to question authority in the U.S. these days?
What I find incredible is that the crowd just sits there and laughs. I mean I don't expect them to charge the police officers, but they aren't even challenging what is going on. That's what scares me the most about the police state we are becoming; people's indifference to the loss of fundamental freedoms.

JSPB22 wrote:Didn't you know it's illegal to question authority in the U.S. these days?

These Days? When has it ever been legal to openly oppose government?

As with many stories, I suspect there is more to this one... I have seen a bit of it. Be patient... this kid is a publicity jerk.

Did the cops over react? Maybe. Is this guy crying crocodile tears? Oh, he's crying all the way to the bank...

Well, this is obviously John Kerry's fault.

I voted for Kerry but even I found his approach to it a bit odd. I suppose this becomes a "what should he have done" scenario but I think his talking around it just seems strangely detatched.

Police placed on leave after tasering incident:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/18/studen ... index.html

"The thing that I regret is that civil dialogue and civil discourse did not happen," Machen said. "That's fundamental to a university campus. Why it didn't happen is what we're trying to sort out."

"You will take my question because I have been listening to your crap for two hours," Meyer told Kerry, according to the police report of the incident.

Hilarious. I wish someone would have the set to say that to "W".

I don't think we taser enough people.

JansenFan wrote:I don't think we taser enough people.

Can we start with anyone who picks against the Redskins in Hognostications?

GSPODS wrote:I wish someone would have the set to say that to "W".

They can't. They're not allowed in the room.

joebagadonuts wrote:

GSPODS wrote:I wish someone would have the set to say that to "W".

They can't. They're not allowed in the room.

Or the same city block.

Countertrey wrote:As with many stories, I suspect there is more to this one...

A provocateur succeeded in having the dumb cops play HIS game. What else is there to discuss? Next issue, please.

Redskin in Canada wrote:

Countertrey wrote:As with many stories, I suspect there is more to this one...

A provocateur succeeded in having the dumb cops play HIS game. What else is there to discuss? Next issue, please.

GSPODS wrote:

JansenFan wrote:I don't think we taser enough people.

Can we start with anyone who picks against the Redskins in Hognostications?

That works...

















so long as it isn't retroactive to last year.......

How did they tell the student was actually tasered? Listening to Kerry's flip flopping contentless finger pointing ranting is like being tasered already.

KazooSkinsFan wrote:How did they tell the student was actually tasered? Listening to Kerry's flip flopping contentless finger pointing ranting is like being tasered already.

Actually, Kerry wanted to answer his questions but the police were too busy playing with their new toys to be paying any attention ...

joebagadonuts wrote:Well, this is obviously John Kerry's fault.

I totally agree with you there. That's why I voted for Bush.

Bishop Hammer wrote:

joebagadonuts wrote:Well, this is obviously John Kerry's fault.

I totally agree with you there. That's why I voted for Bush.

One more to BLAME!

NC43Hog wrote:

Bishop Hammer wrote:

joebagadonuts wrote:Well, this is obviously John Kerry's fault.

I totally agree with you there. That's why I voted for Bush.

One more to BLAME!

Not that it matters at this point, but shouldn't we be blaming the Supreme Court for Bush? They're the idiots who overlooked the popular vote (You know, the Will Of The People) and sided with the Electoral College (Fix).

GSPODS wrote:

NC43Hog wrote:

Bishop Hammer wrote:

joebagadonuts wrote:Well, this is obviously John Kerry's fault.

I totally agree with you there. That's why I voted for Bush.

One more to BLAME!

Not that it matters at this point, but shouldn't we be blaming the Supreme Court for Bush? They're the idiots who overlooked the popular vote (You know, the Will Of The People) and sided with the Electoral College (Fix).

Actually what I take issue with most there (and, yes, I am violating my own rule about these threads) was that the court went against its OWN established precedent of deferring to states' rights in these matters and decided to be the very kind of interventionist court the conservatives are always going on about. But it worked out so well, why complain?

Fios wrote:

GSPODS wrote:

NC43Hog wrote:

Bishop Hammer wrote:

joebagadonuts wrote:Well, this is obviously John Kerry's fault.

I totally agree with you there. That's why I voted for Bush.

One more to BLAME!

Not that it matters at this point, but shouldn't we be blaming the Supreme Court for Bush? They're the idiots who overlooked the popular vote (You know, the Will Of The People) and sided with the Electoral College (Fix).

Actually what I take issue with most there (and, yes, I am violating my own rule about these threads) was that the court went against its OWN established precedent of deferring to states' rights in these matters and decided to be the very kind of interventionist court the conservatives are always going on about. But it worked out so well, why complain?

Which rule of yours are you supposively violating? To ignore them completely, or did you simply fail to mention that if anyone deserves to be tasered it is the members of the Supreme Court?

Fios wrote:Actually what I take issue with most there (and, yes, I am violating my own rule about these threads) was that the court went against its OWN established precedent of deferring to states' rights in these matters and decided to be the very kind of interventionist court the conservatives are always going on about. But it worked out so well, why complain?

The problem with states rights in that case was there was no way to actually defer to states rights. The judiciary was dictatorially overruling both the legislature who established the voting procedures and the executive branch who was executing the laws as passed.

In that case where you have 1 branch of government dictating to the other two, is it really "deferring to state rights" to stay out of it? The vote was 9-0 that Florida's courts were in err to allow different voting standards also, meaning both sides agreed with the decision.

Florida was a bad situation. The problem is that the vote count was within the margin of error for the ability of the equipment used to accurately count votes. However it ended up was going to be unfortunate. It's a matter of money, if we want better ability to count votes we need to spend the money to buy better equipment.

GSPODS wrote:Not that it matters at this point, but shouldn't we be blaming the Supreme Court for Bush? They're the idiots who overlooked the popular vote (You know, the Will Of The People) and sided with the Electoral College (Fix).

I can't tell, is this tongue in cheek or are you serious the Supreme Court should have rewritten the Constitution after the candidates campaigned and the votes were cast expecting them to be counted according to the electoral college?