Page 1 of 1

Free Agents

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:56 am
by andyjens89
We're getting these guys

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:00 am
by 1niksder
What would we do with Corey Dillon?

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:03 am
by andyjens89
That's obvious

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:12 am
by 1niksder
andyjens89 wrote:That's obvious

Obviously not....

We have Portis and Betts, if we needed another back why not just hold on to TJ since he's been in the system for a year.

Not to mention he is still under contract with the Pats (meaning he IS NOT a free agent) and will cost at the least a draft pick we don't have.

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:18 am
by Redskin in Canada
I am sure we will NOT sign several of these players. In fact, we may sign NONE of them. But Dillon is the least likely of them all. He might even retire in the next month or so.

Clements might be over-paid to play with us if Shawn Springs does not stay. Please remember that each and everyone of those above, with the exception of CD, is looking for top-5 money to play -anywhere-.

Boy, I hate free-agency. I loved it when loyalty meant something.

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:54 am
by warpath1410
well said Redskin in Canada!!

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:09 am
by redskindave
Corey Dillon.. No need for him

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:36 pm
by frankcal20
If I had a choice I would choose Ad Thomas because he is a high level player who is versatile.

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:10 pm
by Cappster
Dillon can barely run a 40 yard dash. I don't think we need him at all!

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:49 pm
by xhadow
Isn't Dillon trying to retire now?

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:10 pm
by andyjens89
frankcal20 wrote:If I had a choice I would choose Ad Thomas because he is a high level player who is versatile.


Yes, but which one will they NOT sign

Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:06 pm
by fireman
Dillion is just looking for one last paycheck before he hangs it up and of course with our past history of handing out that last paycheck our name gets thrown out there.