Page 1 of 1
Ethan Albright Re-Signs
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:46 pm
by Jake
'Red Snapper' Albright Re-Signs With Redskins
Associated Press
Monday, January 8, 2007; 3:50 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Long snapper Ethan Albright re-signed with the Washington Redskins on Monday.
Albright, known as "Red Snapper" because of his red hair, will return for his seventh season with the Redskins, the team said. He has not missed a game since joining the Redskins in 2001, and he just completed another year without a bad snap on punts or field goal attempts.
The 35-year-old Albright has also played for Miami and Buffalo in his 12-year career.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 00918.htmlRedskins Move Quickly to Re-sign Albright
By Gary Fitzgerald
Redskins.com
January 8, 2007
The Redskins have re-signed veteran long snapper Ethan Albright, the team announced on Monday.
Ethan Albright (Don Wright Photo)
Albright, 6-5 and 265 pounds, has been a model of consistency as the Redskins' long snapper over the past six seasons. Simply put, if you don't hear Albright's name on game day, that means he performed well.
As long snapper, Albright plays a key role in snapping the ball on field goals and punts.
Its importance was perhaps underscored in last Saturday's Wild Card playoff game between the Dallas Cowboys and Seattle Seahawks.
While Dallas holder Tony Romo's drop on a game-winning field goal had nothing to do with the long snapper, it's important to make sure that the exchange is as smooth and consistent as possible.
An 11-year NFL veteran out of North Carolina, Albright originally entered the NFL as an undrafted free agent with Miami in 1994.
He saw his first NFL action in 1995, playing in 10 games with the Dolphins before suffering a season-ending knee injury. He joined Buffalo in 1996 and spent five seasons with the Bills. He joined the Redskins in 2001.
Since then, Albright has played in all 16 games every season for the Redskins. He has proven himself as one of the league's very best long snappers during that time.
http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=24244
Another great move.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 9:30 am
by Fios
Very smart move, good to see the team rewarding his quiet consistency
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:03 am
by joebagadonuts
I think we should have let him go and picked up a big name long snapper for big money.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:23 am
by Irn-Bru
We re-signed this guy. . .are you kidding me?! He has like a 25 throw power and 32 throw accuracy rating in Madden!
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:27 am
by Mursilis
joebagadonuts wrote:I think we should have let him go and picked up a big name long snapper for big money.
But only if you can assure us the new, big money snapper would be an absolute bust and a lockerroom cancer. Meanwhile, Albright would go to another team, where he'd perfect his craft such that the kicker would only have to hold his foot up, and Albright would ricochet the snap off the kicker's shoe right through the uprights!
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:36 am
by Cappster
Must be nice to make 800,000 a year for playing in about 10 plays per game!
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:17 pm
by pgraham
It was a good move by the team.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:57 pm
by Redskins Rule
Great news!
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:49 pm
by SkinsHead56
Cappster wrote:Must be nice to make 800,000 a year for playing in about 10 plays per game!
No doubt it is a sweet gig.
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:26 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
I wonder what his Madden rating will be?
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:42 pm
by frankcal20
Cappster wrote:Must be nice to make 800,000 a year for playing in about 10 plays per game!
My favorite thing about him is he doesn't have an agent. He negotiates his own contracts. He knows that he is going to get the vet minimum so why give away 10%. Good job RED!
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:05 am
by HEROHAMO
frankcal20 wrote:Cappster wrote:Must be nice to make 800,000 a year for playing in about 10 plays per game!
My favorite thing about him is he doesn't have an agent. He negotiates his own contracts. He knows that he is going to get the vet minimum so why give away 10%. Good job RED!
For that reason alone I like him. At first I was gonna say dump him. When I found out he negotiates his own contract,that is the kind of guy we need.
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:34 am
by sch1977
Cappster wrote:Must be nice to make 800,000 a year for playing in about 10 plays per game!
Are they accepting applications??
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:04 am
by JansenFan
HEROHAMO wrote:frankcal20 wrote:Cappster wrote:Must be nice to make 800,000 a year for playing in about 10 plays per game!
My favorite thing about him is he doesn't have an agent. He negotiates his own contracts. He knows that he is going to get the vet minimum so why give away 10%. Good job RED!
For that reason alone I like him. At first I was gonna say dump him. When I found out he negotiates his own contract,that is the kind of guy we need.
Dump him? Despite EA Sports assessment, Ethan Albright is the best long snapper in the league.
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:37 am
by Hooligan
The "letter" to John Madden is still one of the funniest things I've read on the internet.
Probably not work-safe.
http://www.depthcore.com/user/609/blog/173/
"You know what, John? Two can play at this game. I rate you a **** 12. That's right, I rate you a **** 12 in Ethan Albright Football 2000-ever."
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:18 pm
by frankcal20
That is funny. Did this letter increase his numbers on Madden?
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:12 am
by tcwest10
A
lunchbox?
This is a great read. My firewall didn't catch it, and boy...am I glad. What a gutbuster!
Anyway, if you've ever put a team together (an acutal team, that is)....you realize how important (and overlooked) the detail guys are. Long snapper is not for every center out there, and a good one is hard to find. Think about it. The man has to deliver a football 15 yards behind him, right into the hands of the punter. If we ever do find a punter worth a damn, Albright will be worth his weight in gold.
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:29 am
by JansenFan
Exactly. We already have to worry about whether the field goal will be good. Do we want to also have to worry about the snap?