Page 1 of 1
Carlos Rogers plus Campbell equals better cornerback?
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:27 pm
by gay4pacman
So I am a big fan of SEC football and believe that it is by far the best conference in all of college football. (South Carolina Gamecock alumni)
That aside, after watching the last game I feel that with the addition of Jason Campbell into the starting qb role, he has given carlos a boost on the defensive side. I know that nothing has been said about this connection, but they are truly good freinds and I believe that with the injection of jason, a shot has been fired into carlos.
We will see over the next few weeks, but i really feel that this could be the start of a new mentality for carlos and possibly the making of a shut down corner for the Redskins.
thoughts?

Re: Carlos Rogers plus Campbell equals better cornerback?
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:44 pm
by ii7-V7
gay4pacman wrote:thoughts?
Yeah, that sure was a poor choice for a screen name......
...Oh, you meant about Carlos Rogers.
Well, Anything is possible and the mental aspect of a player is huge. If he thinks that he has something to fight for he's going to play harder. I think that there are probably bigger motivating factors however.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:47 pm
by cleg
Could be but I think the result yesterday was more from Gibbs tirade earlier in the week.
And, yeah, what's up with the screen name?
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:38 pm
by 1niksder
cleg wrote:Could be but I think the result yesterday was more from Gibbs tirade earlier in the week.
Or the fact that he wasn't playing 12 yards off the LOS, and that he said that he needs to trust his speed more.
cleg wrote:And, yeah, what's up with the screen name?
Joined right around draft time last year, The Skins were looking for a top corner at the time, Man I hope that's what's up with that name

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:57 pm
by Deadskins
Carlos needs to be more physical in the first 5 yards, (bump and run) not give 10 yard cushions no matter the down and distance. He also needs to learn to run with the receiver while looking back for the ball. He did a much better job of that this week.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:30 pm
by gay4pacman
I love pacman.
He's looked pretty nice this year....Wouldnt have mind if he slipped to us. Returning punts and covering wr'.
Whats up with questioning the screename?
Like peole on this site dont have weird screenames. Do I have to list some of them?
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:34 pm
by ii7-V7
gay4pacman wrote:I love pacman.
He's looked pretty nice this year....Wouldnt have mind if he slipped to us. Returning punts and covering wr'.
Whats up with questioning the screename?
Like peole on this site dont have weird screenames. Do I have to list some of them?
Just giving you a hardtime. If I remember correctly I gave you a hard time back in March '05 when you were trumpeting that name. My thought was......thats sure going to be an outdated screenname. I wonder if he will change it or keep it. Thats it....nothing more...
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:36 pm
by Fios
gay4pacman wrote:Like peole on this site dont have weird screenames. Do I have to list some of them?
Yes
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 8:43 pm
by gay4pacman
1. fios
2.gay4pacman
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:43 pm
by Champsturf
chaddukes wrote:gay4pacman wrote:I love pacman.
He's looked pretty nice this year....Wouldnt have mind if he slipped to us. Returning punts and covering wr'.
Whats up with questioning the screename?
Like peole on this site dont have weird screenames. Do I have to list some of them?
Just giving you a hardtime. If I remember correctly I gave you a hard time back in March '05 when you were trumpeting that name. My thought was......thats sure going to be an outdated screenname. I wonder if he will change it or keep it. Thats it....nothing more...
I'm sure glad mine isn't dated. Whew!

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:07 am
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Champsturf wrote:I'm sure glad mine isn't dated. Whew!

Good thing your avatar is accurate, too.

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:07 am
by Fios
gay4pacman wrote:1. fios
2.gay4pacman
Heyyyyyyyyyyyy
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:42 am
by air_hog
gay4pacman wrote:I love pacman.
He's looked pretty nice this year....Wouldnt have mind if he slipped to us. Returning punts and covering wr'.
Whats up with questioning the screen name
Yeah, and plus he could be our teams best player at slapping women and getting in bar fights.
And the only reason I think people give you a hard time about you screen name is because, you know... "gay"4pacman... I don't know but, that's kind of, well, gay

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:58 am
by ii7-V7
Champsturf wrote: I'm sure glad mine isn't dated. Whew!

Yeah, how did I missed that?
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:09 pm
by Donkey McDonkerton
Mine is my name, so it wont ever be outdated.

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:16 pm
by Buttercock
I was told check this thread because a name debate was going on. I'm not as bad as gay4wifebeater.
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:47 pm
by crazyhorse1
cleg wrote:Could be but I think the result yesterday was more from Gibbs tirade earlier in the week.
And, yeah, what's up with the screen name?
Don't forget the lift the whole team is getting from the Brunell benching.
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:28 pm
by gay4pacman
air_hog wrote:gay4pacman wrote:I love pacman.
He's looked pretty nice this year....Wouldnt have mind if he slipped to us. Returning punts and covering wr'.
Whats up with questioning the screen name
Yeah, and plus he could be our teams best player at slapping women and getting in bar fights.
And the only reason I think people give you a hard time about you screen name is because, you know... "gay"4pacman... I don't know but, that's kind of, well, gay

How about changing the game with his punt returns and interceptions? Like the redskins dont have trouble with delinquent player...(cough) Sean Taylor (couhgh)
He might not have been the best person in that draft but he was the best cornerback.
Carlos is turning over a new leaf with his coverage skills. We all know he can play the run he just needs to start covering better. Maybe Jason gave him a boost because thery are such good buddies.
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:01 pm
by Skins2daGrave
couldnt you have made it "crazy4pacman" or "happy4pacman"? hehe
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:06 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Skins2daGrave wrote:couldnt you have made it "crazy4pacman" or "happy4pacman"? hehe
No, cause those names just sound downright fruity.
