Page 1 of 1
2 INT's for EX-Skin
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:53 pm
by frankcal20
Walt Harris had 2 int's today.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:01 pm
by ii7-V7
I remember how everyone claimed that he was so horrible.....but I sure would like to have him now!
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:05 pm
by fredp45
why? So he can make tackles 8 yards downfield?
Our front 7 stink this year...it ain't the back 4.
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:33 am
by ii7-V7
fredp45 wrote:why? So he can make tackles 8 yards downfield?
Our front 7 stink this year...it ain't the back 4.
I'm not so sure I agree with that. I think our front 11 suck...as well as our back 11!
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:30 pm
by frankcal20
We arn't even going to get started on Carlos Rogers lack of coverage.
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:24 am
by die cowboys die
chaddukes wrote:fredp45 wrote:why? So he can make tackles 8 yards downfield?
Our front 7 stink this year...it ain't the back 4.
I'm not so sure I agree with that. I think our front 11 suck...as well as our back 11!
and don't forget the "Sideline 16"! they also suck.

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:43 pm
by HailSkins94
Walt Harris has 5 INT's on the year. The Redskins defense has 3.
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:53 pm
by Redskin in Canada
I have an idea!
Let us review the accomplishments of every past Skins who has had a decent season so far. No, not all of the departed only the ones who have had a decent season. It is time to make us feel as bad as possible during these cheerful moments.
It is called masochism.
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:49 am
by ii7-V7
Redskin in Canada wrote:I have an idea!
Let us review the accomplishments of every past Skins who has had a decent season so far. No, not all of the departed only the ones who have had a decent season. It is time to make us feel as bad as possible during these cheerful moments.
It is called masochism.
Yeah, but I think of it as evidence that the armchair coaches don't really know how to evaluate talent as well as they think that they do. There is a reason that this guys is still playing at a high level.....and a reason why our secondary is now like a sieve. We are minus Harris, and Clark; two people who most people really didn't think were our strongest attributes.
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:19 am
by Irn-Bru
I agree with RiC and chaddukes. . .criticism of letting Clark go I can understand, but I'd like to see people calling the loss of someone like Harris a mistake when it happens next time, before we hear a mid-season report.
I remember that CLL was sad to see Wilds go but I don't remember any words about Harris as he left. . .

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:02 am
by ii7-V7
Irn-Bru wrote:I agree with RiC and chaddukes. . .criticism of letting Clark go I can understand, but I'd like to see people calling the loss of someone like Harris a mistake when it happens next time, before we hear a mid-season report.
I remember that CLL was sad to see Wilds go but I don't remember any words about Harris as he left. . .

I vehemently defended Harris when he was here, but I was the only one. I wasn't happy to see him go, but I understood that his cap number was kind of high, so I didn't balk too much.