The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Get on the bandwagon!

i know we're playing badly, but i seriously doubt we will lose seven in a row.

chaddukes wrote:Get on the bandwagon!

Sorry boss, we are done.

chaddukes wrote:Get on the bandwagon!

I'd get on the 'high draft pick' bandwagon, but I know we're either going to trade it away for some washed-up has-been, or waste it on a decent player who will likely never see the field. (See Campbell, Jason).

It really is time to put in Campbell. I've supported Brunell but we are 3-6 and he isn't doing anything...it's time to make the switch and see if Campbell is good or if we need to find another QB in the offseason.

Mursilis wrote:

chaddukes wrote:Get on the bandwagon!

I'd get on the 'high draft pick' bandwagon, but I know we're either going to trade it away for some washed-up has-been, or waste it on a decent player who will likely never see the field. (See Campbell, Jason).

If we do lose 7, think of what a great player we could trade for and let sit on the bench. For that high a pick we could even get a good QB to sit on the bench behind Brunell.

chaddukes wrote:Get on the bandwagon!

die cowboys die wrote:

chaddukes wrote:Get on the bandwagon!

wake up bro we suck and the season is OVER !!!!!!

chaddukes wrote:Get on the bandwagon!

like I said, 4-12. This team is just plain BAD!!!! Going to make getting rid of the rest of my tickets very difficult.

The wagon is broke!!!

aswas71788 wrote:The wagon is broke!!!

the wagon is torched!!!

Playoffs...? PLAYOFFS!?

7 in a row and we might still not go! I'm always down for positivity, but at this point 10 and 6 may not even be enough.

We're behind San Fran and Green Bay for the wildcards

I HOPE ALL YOU BRUNELL LOVERS ARE HAPPY


This is what we get, we deserve this because we're the only team in the league who would put MB out at QB period.

Gibbs4Life wrote:I HOPE ALL YOU BRUNELL LOVERS ARE HAPPY


This is what we get, we deserve this because we're the only team in the league who would put MB out at QB period.

Mark Brunell and Ladell Betts are the only two players on this team who are playing consistently. Brunell isn't McNabb, but he has been the best part of our offense. If you want to blame this whole season on Brunell thats fine, but don't be surprised when they change QB's and we still suck. There are a lot of things wrong with this team and QB isn't near the top of that list.

chaddukes wrote:

Gibbs4Life wrote:I HOPE ALL YOU BRUNELL LOVERS ARE HAPPY


This is what we get, we deserve this because we're the only team in the league who would put MB out at QB period.

Mark Brunell and Ladell Betts are the only two players on this team who are playing consistently. Brunell isn't McNabb, but he has been the best part of our offense.

You should try watching the games sober. It's a whole different experience.

chaddukes wrote:Brunell isn't McNabb, but he has been the best part of our offense.

x 10 Billion
Thanks for the laugh, I needed to get going this morning.

I'll be on the bandwagon until we've got 8 or 9 losses in the column. You never know for sure until it's over. . .

Irn-Bru wrote:I'll be on the bandwagon until we've got 8 or 9 losses in the column. You never know for sure until it's over. . .

We'll know later this week. If Brunell remains the starter, it's over. If Campbell gets a shot, there's the faintest glimmer of hope.

Mursilis wrote:

Irn-Bru wrote:I'll be on the bandwagon until we've got 8 or 9 losses in the column. You never know for sure until it's over. . .

We'll know later this week. If Brunell remains the starter, it's over. If Campbell gets a shot, there's the faintest glimmer of hope.

How can you possibly say that? Has Campbell taken a snap in the NFL?

Mursilis wrote:

chaddukes wrote:

Gibbs4Life wrote:I HOPE ALL YOU BRUNELL LOVERS ARE HAPPY


This is what we get, we deserve this because we're the only team in the league who would put MB out at QB period.

Mark Brunell and Ladell Betts are the only two players on this team who are playing consistently. Brunell isn't McNabb, but he has been the best part of our offense.

You should try watching the games sober. It's a whole different experience.

OK, so who on offense is playing better? Portis? Moss? ey? Samuels? Seriously, if I'm wrong then who would you point to as being a better performer this year?

chaddukes wrote:

Mursilis wrote:

Irn-Bru wrote:I'll be on the bandwagon until we've got 8 or 9 losses in the column. You never know for sure until it's over. . .

We'll know later this week. If Brunell remains the starter, it's over. If Campbell gets a shot, there's the faintest glimmer of hope.

How can you possibly say that? Has Campbell taken a snap in the NFL?

Nope, but Brunell has, and from what I've seen of those, how much worse could Campbell be?

chaddukes wrote:

Mursilis wrote:

chaddukes wrote:

Gibbs4Life wrote:I HOPE ALL YOU BRUNELL LOVERS ARE HAPPY


This is what we get, we deserve this because we're the only team in the league who would put MB out at QB period.

Mark Brunell and Ladell Betts are the only two players on this team who are playing consistently. Brunell isn't McNabb, but he has been the best part of our offense.

You should try watching the games sober. It's a whole different experience.

OK, so who on offense is playing better? Portis? Moss? ey? Samuels? Seriously, if I'm wrong then who would you point to as being a better performer this year?

Hey, you can't blame the receivers if the QB isn't delivering, and Portis has been dealing with injury and the same issue he had in '04 - defenses stacking the box because they know Brunell can't consistently hit the deep ball, and can't handle pressure. It was just amazing to me that Philly didn't even try to hide the blitzes yesterday - they'd just stack guys all over the line, practically waving a sign saying "Blitz coming! We dare you to beat it!", and Brunell never did.

Mursilis wrote:

Irn-Bru wrote:I'll be on the bandwagon until we've got 8 or 9 losses in the column. You never know for sure until it's over. . .

We'll know later this week. If Brunell remains the starter, it's over. If Campbell gets a shot, there's the faintest glimmer of hope.

I would say there is hope this year if Campbell plays, but there will be hope for the future.

chaddukes, you must still be watching old film of Brunell in Jacksonville 10 years ago, he's terrible. As someone here has already stated, Brunell won't lose a game for you but he won't win either. Brunell is way past his prime and we need to let Jason start learning the offense.

What I have yet to understand is they say that it takes 2 to 3 years to learn Saunders' offense, if this is true then why is Brunell playing at all this year, even if he was playing very well. He won't be here in 2 or 3 years but Campbell will, so Campbell needs to be learning this offense, and you can't do that in practice.

The saddest thing about the Redskins of the past 10-12 years is that they (owner/GM) can't understand what "the rebuilding years" are, they keep trying to buy a team and win the Superbowl each and every year and it's not working. They need to chalk up a year or two to learning and rebuilding and start drafting some younger talent and build the team they want, not picking has been pro bowlers and trying to win with them. It's getting so frustrating to see the same crap year in and year out..... spend money on overpriced players who don't produce.

GET A CLUE DANNY BOY!!!!!!!!! This is not a business takeover..... it's football....a game.