[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 240: Undefined array key 1
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era • Same Position, but Different Jobs
Page 1 of 7

Same Position, but Different Jobs

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:05 am
by 1niksder
Roles on Redskins Change For Vincent and Archuleta

By Howard Bryant
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 7, 2006; Page E01

In the short term of the Washington Redskins' season, it is unlikely that a single event has embellished the fates of two men more than what occurred in the waning seconds to Redskins safeties Adam Archuleta and Troy Vincent on Sunday.

Vincent, playing in only his second game as a member of the Redskins, was the hero in the wild 22-19 win over Dallas, blocking the field goal attempt with four seconds left that first kept the Redskins from losing a heartbreaking game and then led them to a stunning win, when fellow safety Sean Taylor picked up the loose ball and ran 30 yards, setting up Nick Novak's winning 47-yard field goal.

Had Vincent not interceded, the lasting image of Sunday afternoon would not have been the elation that at least for one afternoon elevated a slumping team but of a loss caused by the return of a constant nemesis: the Redskins' inability to defend the deep middle part of the field.

With 13 seconds left in a tie game, Dallas tight end Jason Witten beat Archuleta down the right hash mark for a 28-yard catch from quarterback Tony Romo that for the moment appeared to set up the winning field goal for the Cowboys.

Those two plays in the final seconds seemed to take on a certain symbolism, for that day assistant head coach-defense Gregg Williams replaced Archuleta with Vincent in the starting lineup. It marked Williams's first major change of the season in his defensive lineup and was the first time this season that Archuleta, the safety the Redskins signed to a six-year, $30-million contract with $10 million guaranteed -- the biggest contract for a safety in NFL history -- did not start a game for the Redskins.

Archuleta, who was not at Redskins Park yesterday, was unavailable for comment and his agent did not return a call seeking comment.

Archuleta's play clearly is not the only reason the Redskins have given up so many big plays -- teams have thrown at safety Sean Taylor, targeted every cornerback and linebacker on the roster, and the inability of the defensive line to produce consistent pressure has left the secondary vulnerable -- but during the bye week Williams began devising a new role for him and unveiled it Sunday.

It appears that Archuleta's new role will be closer to the line of scrimmage, where he can shut down the run and blitz the quarterback. Against Dallas, when Williams employed a 3-2-6 formation, he used Archuleta as a third safety, in his words a cross between a linebacker and safety. Of Archuleta's skill set, pass coverage -- especially in the Redskins' scheme where a safety is asked to cover deep patches of the field while still reacting to run coverage -- represents his weakest area.

"We need to put players in the best situations for them and Adam needs to be around the box more, and we finally have the personnel situation where I can get him around the box more," Williams said. "We blitzed several times and he was close to getting there. And we'll continue to do that. He's like that hybrid safety, hybrid linebacker and we're going to get him around the line of scrimmage as much as we can."

If the move was not a repudiation of Archuleta, who has struggled finding his rhythm and place in his first season in Washington, it underscored the need for change in the defensive secondary beyond merely having its best players healthy. Sunday's game was the first time the Redskins put their projected lineup on the field since the first preseason game against Cincinnati on Aug. 13, but Williams nevertheless felt he needed to sit Archuleta in favor or Vincent.

Vincent does not refer to himself as replacing Archuleta or succeeding him. He says this because it is unfair to a teammate, and because after being in the NFL for 15 years, he says the worst mistake a player can make is to turn the good fortune of one game into a mandate.

"I'm not the answer. I just want to be a piece to the puzzle," he said. "I don't take anything for granted, and I have to earn my position every single day, not just on Sundays but Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, making sure my teammates know they can hold me accountable because I'm going to hold them accountable."

Within days of Vincent's signing, a coming change was obvious. Vincent replaced Archuleta in key passing situations in a 36-22 loss to Indianapolis on Oct. 22, even though he had practiced just twice with the team. Entering Sunday, the Redskins had given up more pass plays of 40 yards or more than any team in football. Only the Green Bay Packers had given up more plays of 30 yards or more. A disturbing percentage of those plays had occurred over the middle of the field, between the hash marks.

And Sunday, Vincent was in the seam when Terrell Owens got past him for what -- had Owens not dropped the ball -- would have been a game-breaking 74-yard touchdown.

During yesterday's news conference, Coach Joe Gibbs said Archuleta plays in numerous defensive packages. Yet, there is no question Archuleta's playing time in passing situations has decreased since the arrival of Vincent.

"I don't think he's just in the box. I think he's doing quite a bit of stuff for us," Gibbs said. "He's our captain on our punt return. I think he plays all the things. He plays in the secondary in coverage. I think what Troy brings to the table is someone who has a lot of experience and can make a lot of the calls, and is very sharp."


WP Link

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:23 am
by air_hog
I actually would like the see Arch try playing Strong Side LB...

I mean Holdman's not that good and I think AA could get around blockers better than Holdman.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:29 am
by die cowboys die
i heard some post-game people somewhere saying that probably prioleau was supposed to fill that 2nd coverage safety role all along, with archuleta being that "hybrid safety/LB". then prioleau got hurt on the opening kickoff of the season and AA was forced into a role he wasn't expected to fill.

i HOPE that is the case, because if we weren't hoping to count on this guy for pass coverage, there might actually be some hope for our personnel department.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:30 am
by 1niksder
I think he would pass rush and cover as a additional DB not a replacement for a LB. Had Prioleau not gotten hurt we would have seen this a lot sooner

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:31 am
by 1niksder
die cowboys die wrote:i HOPE that is the case, because if we weren't hoping to count on this guy for pass coverage, there might actually be some hope for our personnel department.

He was never a cover guy... always a hitter you go bring down into the box,

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:35 am
by die cowboys die
1niksder wrote:
die cowboys die wrote:i HOPE that is the case, because if we weren't hoping to count on this guy for pass coverage, there might actually be some hope for our personnel department.

He was never a cover guy... always a hitter you go bring down into the box,


that's what i mean... everyone knew he wasn't a coverage guy... so if we had brought him in actually hoping to cover, it would mean our personell department is full of idiots. but if that wasn't the original plan, then maybe things aren't as bad.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:45 am
by 1niksder
die cowboys die wrote:
1niksder wrote:
die cowboys die wrote:i HOPE that is the case, because if we weren't hoping to count on this guy for pass coverage, there might actually be some hope for our personnel department.

He was never a cover guy... always a hitter you go bring down into the box,


that's what i mean... everyone knew he wasn't a coverage guy... so if we had brought him in actually hoping to cover, it would mean our personell department is full of idiots. but if that wasn't the original plan, then maybe things aren't as bad.

I know most of the staff around here has been trying to get that point across to you guys for awhile. But then you see him play and :oops:

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:46 am
by warpath1410
I agree AA needs to rush rush rush he's got speed and man he can tackel :D :D :lol:

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 7:50 am
by Chris Luva Luva
die cowboys die wrote:
1niksder wrote:
die cowboys die wrote:i HOPE that is the case, because if we weren't hoping to count on this guy for pass coverage, there might actually be some hope for our personnel department.

He was never a cover guy... always a hitter you go bring down into the box,


that's what i mean... everyone knew he wasn't a coverage guy... so if we had brought him in actually hoping to cover, it would mean our personell department is full of idiots. but if that wasn't the original plan, then maybe things aren't as bad.


Yea, we all knew he wasn't a coverage guy but we didnt know he was as bad as he is. I can't name 2 plays where he's made a good play on the ball in flight.

Heck!! Ill almost guarantee that Marcus Washington has more passes defended than AA. IMO he's still going to suck in this new role and the fact that he's ONLY being used for this is going to tip off the offense.

I dont care how much money he's making. If he's making $1 a game until 2080 when it becomes $1000000000000 a second, its still too much. For what he brings to this team, it could have been filled by a rookie. A rookie will look just as bad in coverage. A rookie could get just as many sacks. We got a safety to play LB....? Why not just get a rookie LB since the success of this defense is supposedly contingent on the LB corps.... OOPS I forgot, we have a rookie LB who isn't playing.

Honestly, who would play worse? Rocky or AA?

AA being in the game is almost an admission of stupidity for getting him.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 8:00 am
by DEHog
5 mil a a year for a role player?? You'll never convince me that the Skins brought in AA and paid him that kind of cash to be a role player...think about how many role players 30 mil can buy!

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:13 am
by KazooSkinsFan
DEHog wrote:5 mil a a year for a role player?? You'll never convince me that the Skins brought in AA and paid him that kind of cash to be a role player...think about how many role players 30 mil can buy!


I'm usually a defender of Gibbs and staff. Even Brunell, whom I trash I have more understanding of Gibbs position that he needs solutions, not just to remove poor performers, and he is reluctant to go to a player who's never played with the season still alive.

But I'm with you on this. This and Duckett just seem to be incompetence somewhere. AA could have been a good role player for role player money, but not for this much cap and we paid a high price for a healthy Duckett to play in situations we need him for (we suck on 3rd and 4th and short, see the Dallas game) and let him sit. Those are just two transactions I can't find any rationale for at all.

And if AA had signed for role player money, he would not be the target of fans who expect him to provide value for the money he's being paid.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:15 am
by Chris Luva Luva
I wish someone had the gonads to ask Gibbs the truth as to why TJ isnt playing.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:34 am
by USAFSkinFan
1niksder wrote:
die cowboys die wrote:
1niksder wrote:
die cowboys die wrote:i HOPE that is the case, because if we weren't hoping to count on this guy for pass coverage, there might actually be some hope for our personnel department.

He was never a cover guy... always a hitter you go bring down into the box,


that's what i mean... everyone knew he wasn't a coverage guy... so if we had brought him in actually hoping to cover, it would mean our personell department is full of idiots. but if that wasn't the original plan, then maybe things aren't as bad.

I know most of the staff around here has been trying to get that point across to you guys for awhile. But then you see him play and :oops:


So our whole defensive scheme hinged on Prioleau, a back up safety, not getting hurt? I find that hard to believe...

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:48 am
by 1niksder
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Honestly, who would play worse? Rocky or AA?

AA being in the game is almost an admission of stupidity for getting him.

Just like he wasn't brought in to play a pure safety he wasn't brought in to play a true LB. The team saw something that they thought would work but due to injuries haven't be able to implement it. Troy Vincent's signing but the staff back on course to what they wanted to do. Having a AA down in the box or out on the edge while still having the regular back 7 will be something offenses will have to take into consideration, even if it's leaving the back in to block - it's one less man in the patteren and nine times out of 10 that back would have been a outlet that won't be in the flat to be of help.

Don't knock it until we have seen it.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:51 am
by 1niksder
USAFSkinFan wrote:So our whole defensive scheme hinged on Prioleau, a back up safety, not getting hurt? I find that hard to believe...


Prioleau came into the year as the starter alongside Taylor with Springs and Rogers on the corners. AA would be like a nickle or dime S. Peirson went down and Archuleta was bumped up to a spot that he hadn't signed to play and probably got little work at in the off-season.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:00 am
by Chris Luva Luva
1niksder wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Honestly, who would play worse? Rocky or AA?

AA being in the game is almost an admission of stupidity for getting him.

Just like he wasn't brought in to play a pure safety he wasn't brought in to play a true LB. The team saw something that they thought would work but due to injuries haven't be able to implement it. Troy Vincent's signing but the staff back on course to what they wanted to do. Having a AA down in the box or out on the edge while still having the regular back 7 will be something offenses will have to take into consideration, even if it's leaving the back in to block - it's one less man in the patteren and nine times out of 10 that back would have been a outlet that won't be in the flat to be of help.

Don't knock it until we have seen it.


How many times will it fool the offense? I just dont see a one dimensional player having much impact. If the offense audibles and forces AA into coverage its going to be deadly. If his only ability is to blitz/stop the run then that limits what Lemar can audible into.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:10 am
by 1niksder
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Don't knock it until we have seen it.


How many times will it fool the offense? I just dont see a one dimensional player having much impact. If the offense audibles and forces AA into coverage its going to be deadly. If his only ability is to blitz/stop the run then that limits what Lemar can audible into.[/quote]
It's not a matter of fooling them thay have to account for him, and he'll still have to cover guys but as a hybrid it would be RBs and TEs as oppose to wideouts.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:13 am
by REDEEMEDSKIN
I have this feeling that Mr. Archuleta will improve now that his starting job is seriously in jeopardy.

I don't know why. Just a hunch.

If Gibbs thought he was world-class enough to offer him such a lucrative deal, I believe we have not yet seen all that "Double-A" Adam Archuleta will bring to this team.

In other words, his stock is undervalued at the moment, but it may be rising real soon. My 2 cents

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:14 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:I have this feeling that Mr. Archuleta will improve now that his starting job is seriously in jeopardy.

I don't know why. Just a hunch.

If Gibbs thought he was world-class enough to offer him such a lucrative deal, I believe we have not yet seen all that "Double-A" Adam Archuleta will bring to this team.

In other words, his stock is undervalued at the moment, but it may be rising real soon. My 2 cents


He may improve, but I hope his 5 mil signing bonus was the only guaranteed money in the 30 mil contract so we can dump him off season. BTW, I have not been on the dump AA now bandwagon but the "give him more time" one until now. But 30 mil buys a full time player, not a role player. And Williams has now said he's a role player and a guy who's played 2 games for us can do a better job.

I'm still on the fence with Carter. BL and Randal El have sold me they're worth the dough.

I'd like us to play Duckett. It seems impossible to keep both him and Betts in the cap era and it seems they've chosen Betts, but I'd like to try out Duckett and while Betts is mini-Portis Duckett brings another dimension. It seems worth considering trying to keep him over Betts if Betts gets more money then our cap allows us to pay. I like Betts as a 3rd down and backup, I'm not dissing him. But to me Portis/Duckett is a more scary scenario than Portis/Betts. As our inability to convert short yardage is showing.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:42 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
1niksder wrote:It's not a matter of fooling them thay have to account for him, and he'll still have to cover guys but as a hybrid it would be RBs and TEs as oppose to wideouts.


But he can't cover them. He put the cowboys in FG position last week. He's a bum its plain and simple. RW can't cover either but everyone likes to rag on him. If you are a safety and you can't cover, you suck. You dont have to be a Champ Bailey but at least be a Ryan Clark. :wink:

And to be honest his run stopping isnt jaw dropping either. Taylor is better at what our specialist supposedly was brought in to specialize in.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:07 pm
by skinsfan#33
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Heck!! Ill almost guarantee that Marcus Washington has more passes defended than AA. IMO he's still going to suck in this new role and the fact that he's ONLY being used for this is going to tip off the offense.
AA being in the game is almost an admission of stupidity for getting him.


Marcus has 5 PD and AA has 1

Phillip Daniels has 3 PD, D, Evans has 1, K. Golston has 1, Grif has 1, Holdman has 1, Marshall has 1, Wright has 5, Roggers has 4, Springs has 2, Rumph has 4, and Taylor has 3.

12 players on the Skins have as many or more pass defenses as AA.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:34 pm
by The Hogster
DEHog wrote:5 mil a a year for a role player?? You'll never convince me that the Skins brought in AA and paid him that kind of cash to be a role player...think about how many role players 30 mil can buy!


My thoughts exactly. There are plenty of converted LB's that have made the move between LB and Safety that we can use only to play the box..( who were cheaper than him too)...we made a mistake bringing this guy in here....even gave him a pass during the offseason.

Remember he's "such a friggin stud that we allowed him to keep working out in some far off dungeon since he's like lifting Ford F-150's with each bicep, racing cheetahs and, pulling mobile homes by his jock strap?"

We let him have a pass to sculpt his body....away from the team...only to find out that he looks like Tarzan but plays like Jane. Not to mention, his lack of understanding the scheme...I refuse to make a double standard for this guy...he's been an utter disappointment to me.

:roll:

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:26 pm
by The Hogster
1niksder wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Don't knock it until we have seen it.


How many times will it fool the offense? I just dont see a one dimensional player having much impact. If the offense audibles and forces AA into coverage its going to be deadly. If his only ability is to blitz/stop the run then that limits what Lemar can audible into.

It's not a matter of fooling them thay have to account for him, and he'll still have to cover guys but as a hybrid it would be RBs and TEs as oppose to wideouts.
[/quote]

He's a safety...heck even LB's have to cover sometimes. He can't blitz every down, and if he's in there during a passing situation, he will have to cover someone. Last week he showed exactly what he's capable of....getting beat.

It seems like you're just making a ton of excuses for this guy. He can't be on the field only in running situaitons, or if he's blitzing. He's a liability if the coaching staff has to draw up scheme's just to avoid exposing him as a fraud. Seriously though, how long do you think it will take for offensive coordinators to find a way to isolate him in coverage? He's no better than Matt Bowen in my opinion.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 9:00 pm
by ArizonaHOG
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:I have this feeling that Mr. Archuleta will improve now that his starting job is seriously in jeopardy.

I don't know why. Just a hunch.

If Gibbs thought he was world-class enough to offer him such a lucrative deal, I believe we have not yet seen all that "Double-A" Adam Archuleta will bring to this team.

In other words, his stock is undervalued at the moment, but it may be rising real soon. My 2 cents


Interesting. With The eagles and McNabb coming up this week the hybrid role might put AA in position to have an impact by shadowing the QB to prevent him from making long runs. He has killed us in the past scrambling.

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:53 pm
by 1niksder
The Hogster wrote:It seems like you're just making a ton of excuses for this guy. He can't be on the field only in running situaitons, or if he's blitzing. He's a liability if the coaching staff has to draw up scheme's just to avoid exposing him as a fraud. Seriously though, how long do you think it will take for offensive coordinators to find a way to isolate him in coverage? He's no better than Matt Bowen in my opinion.

I not making excuses for him, I'm just not giving up on him. Most of you feel he makes too much but don't know how much he makes, No one is happy with his performance but most admit he was put into a position that he wasn't brought in to play. Now that the Skins have the personell to use him how they originally planned you all still don't want to see if it works out.

If AA is isolated in coverage it'll be with a TE or a back out of the back field. There will be times when he is the 4th LB and times when he'll be the 5th or 6th DB. It doesn't matter how much time the other team takes to figure him out, Williams already has multiple packages for him so any time a offensive co-ordinator spends scheme on Arch will be time not scheming something else.

He still as to get out there and show us that the move was a good one, but before we rip it apart we should atleast see what it looks like in action.