The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Saddam Hussein Convicted, Receives Death Sentence
By HAMZA HENDAWI, AP

BAGHDAD, Iraq (Nov. 5) - Saddam Hussein was convicted and sentenced Sunday to hang for crimes against humanity in the 1982 killings of 148 people in a single Shiite town, as the ousted leader, trembling and defiant, shouted "God is great!"

As he, his half brother and another senior official in his regime were convicted and sentenced to death by the Iraqi High Tribunal, Saddam yelled out, "Long live the people and death to their enemies. Long live the glorious nation, and death to its enemies!" Later, his lawyer said the former dictator had called on Iraqis to reject sectarian violence and refrain from revenge against U.S. forces.

The trial brought Saddam and his co-defendants before their accusers in what was one of the most highly publicized and heavily reported trials of its kind since the Nuremberg tribunals for members of Adolf Hitler's Nazi regime and its slaughter of 6 million Jews in the World War II Holocaust

"The verdict placed on the heads of the former regime does not represent a verdict for any one person. It is a verdict on a whole dark era that has was unmatched in Iraq's history," Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq's Shiite prime minister, said.

Some feared the verdicts could exacerbate the sectarian violence that has pushed the country to the brink of civil war, after a trial that stretched over nine months in 39 sessions and ended nearly 3 1/2 months ago. Clashes immediately began Sunday in north Baghdad's heavily Sunni Azamiyah district. Elsewhere in the capital, celebratory gunfire rang out.

"This government will be responsible for the consequences, with the deaths of hundreds, thousands or even hundreds of thousands, whose blood will be shed," Salih al-Mutlaq, a Sunni political leader, told the Al-Arabiya satellite television station.

Saddam and his seven co-defendants were on trial for a wave of revenge killings carried out in the city of Dujail following a 1982 assassination attempt on the former dictator. Al-Maliki's Islamic Dawa party, then an underground opposition, has claimed responsibility for organizing the attempt on Saddam's life.

In the streets of Dujail, a Tigris River city of 84,000, people celebrated and burned pictures of their former tormentor as the verdict was read.

Saddam's chief lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi condemned the trial as a "farce," claiming the verdict was planned. He said defense attorneys would appeal within 30 days.

The death sentences automatically go to a nine-judge appeals panel, which has unlimited time to review the case. If the verdicts and sentences are upheld, the executions must be carried out within 30 days.

A court official told The Associated Press that the appeals process was likely to take three to four weeks once the formal paperwork was submitted.

During Sunday's hearing, Saddam initially refused the chief judge's order to rise; two bailiffs pulled the ousted ruler to his feet and he remained standing through the sentencing, sometimes wagging his finger at the judge.

Before the session began, one of Saddam's lawyers, former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, was ejected from the courtroom after handing the judge a memorandum in which he called the trial a travesty.

Chief Judge Raouf Abdul-Rahman pointed to Clark and said in English, "Get out."

In addition to the former Iraqi dictator and Barzan Ibrahim, his former intelligence chief and half brother, the Iraqi High Tribunal convicted and sentenced Awad Hamed al-Bandar, the head of Iraq's former Revolutionary Court, to death by hanging. Iraq's former Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan was convicted of premeditated murder and sentenced to life in prison.

Three defendants were sentenced to 15 years in prison for torture and premeditated murder. Abdullah Kazim Ruwayyid and his son Mizhar Abdullah Ruwayyid were party officials Dujail, along with Ali Dayih Ali. They were believed responsible for the Dujail arrests.

Mohammed Azawi Ali, a former Dujail Baath Party official, was acquitted for lack of evidence and immediately freed.

He faces additional charges in a separate case over an alleged massacre of Kurdish civilians - a trial that will continue while appeals are pending.

The guilty verdict is likely to enrage hard-liners among Saddam's fellow Sunnis, who made up the bulk of the former ruling class. The country's majority Shiites, who were persecuted under the former leader but now largely control the government, will likely view the outcome as a cause of celebration.

Al-Dulaimi, Saddam's lawyer, told AP his client called on Iraqis to reject sectarian violence and called on them to refrain from taking revenge on U.S. invaders.

"His message to the Iraqi people was 'pardon and do not take revenge on the invading nations and their people'," al-Dulaimi said, quoting Saddam. "The president also asked his countrymen to 'unify in the face of sectarian strife."'

In Tikrit, Saddam's hometown, 1,000 people defied the curfew and carried pictures of the city's favorite son through the streets. Some declared the court a product of the U.S. "occupation forces" and condemned the verdict.

"By our souls, by our blood we sacrifice for you Saddam" and "Saddam your name shakes America."

U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad issued a statement saying the verdicts "demonstrate the commitment of the Iraqi people to hold them (Saddam and his co-defendants) accountable."

"Although the Iraqis may face difficult days in the coming weeks, closing the book on Saddam and his regime is an opportunity to unite and build a better future," Khalilzad said.

U.S. officials associated with the tribunal said Saddam's repeated courtroom outbursts during the nine-month trial may have played a key part in his conviction.

They cited his admission in a March 1 hearing that he had ordered the trial of 148 Shiites who were eventually executed, insisting that doing so was legal because they were suspected in the assassination attempt against him. "Where is the crime? Where is the crime?" he asked, standing before the panel of five judges.

Later in the same session, he argued that his co-defendants must be released and that because he was in charge, he alone must be tried. His outburst came a day after the prosecution presented a presidential decree with a signature they said was Saddam's approval for death sentences for the 148 Shiites, their most direct evidence against him.

About 50 of those sentenced by the "Revolutionary Court" died during interrogation before they could go to the gallows. Some of those hanged were children.

"Every time they (defendants) rose and spoke, they provided a lot of incriminating evidence," said one of the U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Under Saddam, Iraq's bureaucracy showed a consistent tendency to document orders, policies and minutes of meetings. That, according to the U.S. officials, helped the prosecution produce more than 30 documents that clearly established the chain of command under Saddam.

One document gave the names of everyone from Dujail banished to a desert detention camp in southern Iraq. Another, prepared by an aide to Saddam, gave the president a detailed account of the punitive measures against the people of Dujail following the failed assassination attempt.

Saddam's trial had from the outset appeared to reflect the turmoil and violence in Iraq since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

One of Saddam's lawyers was assassinated the day after the trial's opening session last year. Two more were later assassinated and a fourth fled the country.

In January, chief judge Rizgar Amin, a Kurd, resigned after complaints by Shiite politicians that he had failed to keep control of court proceedings. He, in turn, complained of political interference in the trial. Abdul-Rahman, another Kurd, replaced Amin.

Hearings were frequently disrupted by outbursts from Saddam and Ibrahim, with the two raging against what they said was the illegitimacy of the court, their ill treatment in the U.S.-run facility where they are being held and the lack of protection for their lawyers.

The defense lawyers contributed to the chaos in the courtroom by staging several boycotts.


11/5/2006 07:06:35 EST

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

air_hog wrote:Good, except I think cutting off his legs and dropping him in the middle of nowhere in Ariona would be more suitable.

But I'll take the death penalty.

dnpmakkah wrote:

air_hog wrote:Good, except I think cutting off his legs and dropping him in the middle of nowhere in Ariona would be more suitable.

But I'll take the death penalty.

Are you an Iraqi? Did Saddam personally effect you in some way? Thats a lot of hate you have there for one man. You seem to want to cause him a great deal of pain. Or maybe you have been sucked into the hype machine that is the U.S. government and everytime you see Saddam you equate it with evil, even though you have no concept or experience of his 'so-called' atrocities.

It's ironic that you want to torchure a man because you think he was evil. The sin of vengence---isn't it great?

air_hog wrote:Now I want to torture him more.

tcwest10 wrote:I'm sure Saddam would appreciate the benefit of the doubt that you're willing to extend to him.
Why don't you prepare the guestroom in your home for him, so you two can discuss the vagaries of sin over coffee on rainy mornings?

tcwest10 wrote:I'm sure Saddam would appreciate the benefit of the doubt that you're willing to extend to him.
Why don't you prepare the guestroom in your home for him, so you two can discuss the vagaries of sin over coffee on rainy mornings?

JansenFan wrote:I don't believe he said anything of his feelings about Bush. TC only said that if you have these warm fuzzy feeling for the man, why don't you bring him into your home.

dnpmakkah wrote:I've never experienced a time in my life when it wasn't safe for Americans to travel ANYWHERE. That should tell you something shouldn't it?

JansenFan wrote:Realistically speaking, it wasn't my suggestion, and, as you probably know, was probably intended as a bit of social commentary on your stance than an actual suggestion.

But again, it wasn't my suggestion, so you'll have to talk to TC, so I'll let him speak for himself.

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:

dnpmakkah wrote:I've never experienced a time in my life when it wasn't safe for Americans to travel ANYWHERE. That should tell you something shouldn't it?

So this is all about YOU not being able to make plans for a family cruise through the Middle East? And you claim Bush is selfish.

JansenFan wrote:Since I do not agree with the basic premise of your post, I cannot answer you.

dnpmakkah wrote:The rest of the world has NO problems with Arabs...

Irn-Bru wrote:If you want an attempt at a straight answer, dnpmakkah, I'll try one. However, keep in mind that I'm not saying anything about Bush or the war or anything else with this.

I believe the reason that Americans are 'celebrating' the death sentence for Saddam is the same reason that they would have 'celebrated' Hitler's death.

The average American was not one of the Jews, homosexuals, Christians, or other minority in Europe that Hitler set about to murder, but the American 'celebration' over Hitler's death was a vicarious experience based on the fact that he was a mass murderer.

The idea is that justice is being done, which is a reason for any human--whether persecuted or not--to be happy.

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:

dnpmakkah wrote:The rest of the world has NO problems with Arabs...

Well, not against all Arabs, certainly. But I'd find it hard to believe that people in London, Madrid, Bali, NYC, would enjoy afternoon tea with your friendly neighborhood radical muslim.

Then again, radical muslims (the violent type) aren't a "problem" to most countries until they cause terror on their own soil.

Irn-Bru wrote:If you want an attempt at a straight answer, dnpmakkah, I'll try one. However, keep in mind that I'm not saying anything about Bush or the war or anything else with this.

I believe the reason that Americans are 'celebrating' the death sentence for Saddam is the same reason that they would have 'celebrated' Hitler's death.

The average American was not one of the Jews, homosexuals, Christians, or other minority in Europe that Hitler set about to murder, but the American 'celebration' over Hitler's death was a vicarious experience based on the fact that he was a mass murderer.

The idea is that justice is being done, which is a reason for any human--whether persecuted or not--to be happy.

dnpmakkah wrote:

tcwest10 wrote:I'm sure Saddam would appreciate the benefit of the doubt that you're willing to extend to him.
Why don't you prepare the guestroom in your home for him, so you two can discuss the vagaries of sin over coffee on rainy mornings?

Explain to me again how Saddam is any different than Bush? I'll try to keep a straight face when reading your input. What makes one man any better than the other?

Do you judge them on the amount of people killed? Because Bush wins that hands down. Do you judge them on how much instability they have caused to a group of people? Bush wins that too. Do you talk about illegal wars/invasions? Another win for your beloved Bush. Maybe one who torchures/punishes people? Ooops both men do that....Abu Garib and Guantanamo comes to mind along with the countless other 'underground' holding cells.

So tell me again...why does Saddam deserve to die yet Bush is not held accountable for? And what did Saddam do to YOU personally that you wish to see him punished. What crimes did he commit against you? I take it there was no crime committed against you.

Maybe you want to see justice served because you feel bad for the Iraqi people who had to endure his reign of terror. Well do you feel bad for the Iraqi people NOW who under Bush's order have to go through hell everyday unlike they have ever faced EVEN UNDER SADDAM? Well what is it? Do you hate Saddam because he is evil or do you hate Saddam because Bush tells you to do so?

No need to answer I think I know it already.