Page 1 of 1
Arrington's Play Book
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:30 pm
by Justice Hog
Does anyone think that the beating the Redskins took today was related to the fact that Arrington purportedly gave his playbook to the Giants coaches?
Just wondering.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:37 pm
by Montana Redskin
No, but alot had to do with our secondary never reading theirs...especially the chapter titled "How to defend 3rd and long bombs"
Re: Arrington's Play Book
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:46 pm
by funbunchfever
Justice Hog wrote:Does anyone think that the beating the Redskins took today was related to the fact that Arrington purportedly gave his playbook to the Giants coaches?
Just wondering.
Between Pierce and Arrington's playbook, I imagine they know it as well as any team. However, we really haven't shut down any team this year. The Vikings had some really long drives against us just like the Giants today.
Re: Arrington's Play Book
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:52 pm
by 1niksder
Justice Hog wrote:Does anyone think that the beating the Redskins took today was related to the fact that Arrington purportedly gave his playbook to the Giants coaches?
Just wondering.
We held them under 20 we should have put up more points
Lavar didn't have the offensive playbook
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:13 am
by JPM36
Absolutely not.
I'm disappointed by LaVar. I know the coaches didn't like him but since Darrell Green retired, LaVar was the toast of this town among the fans. I can't believe he'd act like he was getting revenge on us. Classless.
It's not like he did anything today anyways.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:14 am
by 1niksder
JPM36 wrote:It's not like he did anything today anyways.
He ran really fast....
to the sidelines on 3rd downs
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:48 am
by DEHog
Come on...that whole thing was PR!!
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:17 am
by Justice Hog
DEHog wrote:Come on...that whole thing was PR!!
That's actually why I used the word "purportedly".
Re: Arrington's Play Book
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:45 am
by SkinsJock
Justice Hog wrote:Does anyone think that the beating the Redskins took today was related to the fact that Arrington purportedly gave his playbook to the Giants coaches?
No! I do not think this would have made a difference and I also do not think it really happened. To me it was obviously a childish attempt to "get even" and he embarrased himself by implying that he did it something that most knowlegeable people agree is not likely to happen - complete BS.
We lost this game simply because we did not play well not because of anything the giants did. If both teams play well we would win - we did not play to our potential and we lost but this had nothing to do with any reported activity or input from Arrington or Pierce. Arrington did nothing except show up at the game and he certainly had nothing to do with our bad play.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:27 am
by Burgandyandglory
DEHog wrote:Come on...that whole thing was PR!!
Absolutly! All the LaVar talk was his attempt to shadow the fact that his play has not lived up to the offseasonhype. One tackle and a glass knee? Ohhhhhhhh...........
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:52 pm
by ArizonaHOG
No. I do think it will affect the way Arrington is received when he visits Washington later in the year. The one thing he always had going for him in Washington....the fans that were always behind him. I imagine he has alienated a few of them and will pay for it when he returns. Let's hope he leaves town a loser.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:26 pm
by joebagadonuts
I know I'll be booing him from my couch.