Brett Favre
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:02 am
Rumors are that Brett would consider leaving Green Bay and playing for another team. I am all for picking him up next year for the one two years he has left. If he leaves that it is.
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Brett Favre
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:53 am
He should consider leaving football altogether. He's done...was done last season and needs to admit his run is over.
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:12 am
I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:03 am
1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes
Yikes indeed. Don't we already have 2 veteran QBs whose best days are behind them?!?! Do we really need a third?!? And at what point do we play JC if we bring in Farve - that move makes no sense (unless of course they'll take Brunell in a straight-up trade. I'd do that deal in a minute. I'm not sure how much of an upgrade Farve is at this point over Brunell, but he's definitely an upgrade.).
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:10 am
1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes
Please say you're KIDDING !Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:12 am
not gonna happen...
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:41 am
No Way, As much as i hate to say it, Hes done.
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:42 am
He does have more arm than Brunell ...
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 10:18 am
If there were to be a trade at all, it would have to be Collins for Favre, but I don't see a trade happening.
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:33 pm
Mursilis wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes
Yikes indeed. Don't we already have 2 veteran QBs whose best days are behind them?!?! Do we really need a third?!? And at what point do we play JC if we bring in Farve - that move makes no sense (unless of course they'll take Brunell in a straight-up trade. I'd do that deal in a minute. I'm not sure how much of an upgrade Farve is at this point over Brunell, but he's definitely an upgrade.).
He can still throw the frozen rope and he's still got the deep ball when he gets the time.
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 4:37 pm
Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:54 pm
1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes
I think it was this sportswriter's idea of what might happen, you know how that goes.
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:25 am
Farve still has the physical abilities. He just needs to make better descisions.
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:27 am
Farve would play one to two years max. And hand the keys to JC that would be perfect.Mursilis wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:I actually heard on a Sunday morning radio show (I believe Inside the NFL) that the Skins were considering trading for him in soon. Yikes
Yikes indeed. Don't we already have 2 veteran QBs whose best days are behind them?!?! Do we really need a third?!? And at what point do we play JC if we bring in Farve - that move makes no sense (unless of course they'll take Brunell in a straight-up trade. I'd do that deal in a minute. I'm not sure how much of an upgrade Farve is at this point over Brunell, but he's definitely an upgrade.).
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:55 am
I'd rather let ARE do the interim throwing rather than to replace one headache with another.
In his day, there was none better than Brett. Sadly, his day was a Tuesday in 1997.
In his day, there was none better than Brett. Sadly, his day was a Tuesday in 1997.
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:52 am
tcwest10 wrote:I'd rather let ARE do the interim throwing rather than to replace one headache with another.
Agreed.
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:48 pm
He is far better than what we currently have now. And at least he is not afraid to throw down field.
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:00 pm
HEROHAMO wrote:He is far better than what we currently have now. And at least he is not afraid to throw down field.
agreed. I dont want Brett, i just want to groom JC...BUT if JC is not gonna happen, Brett >>>> Mark.
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:01 pm
Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre
No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:26 am
Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre
No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)
Of course, I'd by happy.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:48 pm
Primetime42 wrote:Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre
No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)
Of course, I'd by happy.
No you wouldnt, bc we would at least score some TD's with Brett.
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:55 pm
Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Primetime42 wrote:Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre
No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)
Of course, I'd by happy.
No you wouldnt, bc we would at least score some TD's with Brett.
Like he did against the Bears?
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:17 pm
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Primetime42 wrote:Brunell can't throw more than 10 yards down the field.Donkey McDonkerton wrote:Primetime42 wrote:Oh I would LOVE it if you guys got Brett Favre
No you wouldnt. He CANT be worse than Brunell.
Favre can throw about 60 yards down the field and still hit a guy right in the numbers...a guy wearing the other jersey. (Substitute any number you'd like for 60)
Of course, I'd by happy.
No you wouldnt, bc we would at least score some TD's with Brett.
Like he did against the Bears?
he has some TDs doesnt he?
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:43 pm
he has some TDs doesnt he?
Clinton didn't have any TDs until week 6 of last season, but that stat doesn't reflect how important he was for us.
Mark may currently be struggling in every way, but bringing in Favre would be a step backward in entirely new and twisted dimensions.
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 11:21 am
Irn-Bru wrote:he has some TDs doesnt he?
Clinton didn't have any TDs until week 6 of last season, but that stat doesn't reflect how important he was for us.
Mark may currently be struggling in every way, but bringing in Favre would be a step backward in entirely new and twisted dimensions.
And you are correct, thats why i said its JC time! I dont want Brett, but he would be better than Brunell. I dont brunell either.