Page 1 of 1

Al Saunders on the Attack

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:53 am
by BurgundyandGoldfaith
One thing Al Saunders has learned in 36 years in the business: Playbooks, like mushrooms, grow best in the dark.

So following Saunders' stunning decision last January to withdraw from several head-coaching vacancies and instead join Joe Gibbs' staff, the Washington Redskins' new associate head coach for offense scurried into a film room at Redskin Park, turned off the lights, and began a painstaking analysis of his new team's plays and its players.

After months of preparation, Saunders harvested the Armillaria Ostoyae - the monster fungi of playbooks - a 700-page tome inspired by his association with renowned offensive innovators John McKay, Johnny Majors, Sid Gillman, Dick Vermeil and, most especially, Don Coryell.

It was the first step of a process vital to the team's hope of making its first Super Bowl appearance in 15 years.

Most likely, the Redskins won't get there unless the offense puts up numbers like those Saunders achieved as Vermeil's offensive coordinator in Kansas City. Starting in 2001, he installed the shifting-and-motion packages Coryell taught him in the 1980s, when the San Diego Chargers were league passing champs seven times. Taking advantage of a superb offensive line and the Pro Bowl talents of tight end Tony Gonzalez, quarterback Trent Green and tailback Priest Holmes, the Chiefs led the NFL the last five seasons by averaging 6,094 yards and 431 points per year.

The Redskins never came close to such proficiency, averaging 4,784 yards and 289 points.

"We aim high; our marker for success is 6,000 yards and 400 points," Saunders said recently, unaware that the Redskins hadn't achieved both in the same season since 1983. That alone helps explain why Gibbs, a fellow Coryell disciple and Hall of Famer, offered Saunders total control of the offense Gibbs himself once ruled, play-calling and all.
Jim Ducibella's picks

Game: Beat the Expert

Redskins channel

More NFL previews

See Thing Your Way.
Latest Videos
Tom Cruise Baby Suri Pictures: HamptonRoads.tv Style
UPDATE: No Charges In MacArthur Mall Evacuation
Crocodile Hunter's Death: Local Expert Talks About Stingrays
First Person: Steve Irwin's Father, 'Best Mate'
Tropical Storm Florence Brewing in Atlantic
Friend: Comair Co-Pilot Able to Speak

See the complete Pilot, exactly as in print
- View stories, photos and ads
- E-mail clippings
- Print copies
Log in or learn more

"I don't think I would have done that with anyone else in the league," said Gibbs, who met Saunders at Southern Cal in 1970 when he coached the offensive line and Saunders was a grad assistant.

"What appealed most was his philosophy. It was Don Coryell and the same coaching tree I came out of. We believe in the same things."

Unlike the lovably quirky Coryell, Saunders isn't some one-dimensional nut obsessively scribbling formations during supper while mom and the kids gab about Driver's Ed class and next month's prom. Sound of mind and body, he holds a Master's degree in Education from Stanford and has run marathons in Boston, Los Angeles and Kansas City.

He's professorial, comparing the design of an offense to choreographing a Broadway musical -- and he doesn't mean 1-2-3, kick. He uses Picasso and Van Gogh to explain offensive philosophies: "They could paint the same thing, but their work would look very different."

Past players laud Saunders, 59, for a unique ability to consistently reap their best performances. He is held in such universal high regard that, had his career taken a different turn, Saunders would be the high school drama teacher whom an Oscar winner thanks in an acceptance speech.

"The thing that's unusual about him is that he tries to figure out how each player responds to learning," former Kansas City receiver Chris Horn said. "He'll see that one guy might not pick up on some things in a meeting room, so he'll make the extra effort to show that guy how it's done on the practice field, and then it all makes sense to him. He takes into account everybody's learning styles."

Shortly before free agency started, Saunders emerged from the darkness. He'd seen enough film to conclude that with last year's talent and the right couple of free agents, he could replicate the success he had in Kansas City. At that point, the playbook contained core formations that any team would run.

"The essence of all of this is to find out what players do best, then put them in position to do it," Saunders said. "Then you get the best skill players you can to allow yourself to be very explosive and to enjoy what you're creating.

"It's like the alphabet. There are only 26 letters, but you can make as many words as you want."

In 35-year-old Mark Brunell, Saunders saw a quarterback comparable to Green: smart enough to adjust to an attack predicated on reading defenses and precision timing. Running back Clinton Portis was an established star, and only a couple hundred yards less productive in '05 than Chiefs tailback Larry Johnson. Tight end Chris Cooley was a poor-man's Gonzalez, but was also just reaching his potential. Healthy, the line was more than capable.

The free agents had to be able to get deep, to draw enough attention from linebackers, corners and safeties to give mercurial Santana Moss more man-to-man coverage or make room for Cooley's new, deeper pass routes. Once the defense is spread, Portis' chances of gashing them with breakaway runs would increase dramatically.

The two players Saunders thought offered the best chance to make that happen: San Francisco's Brandon Lloyd and Pittsburgh's Antwaan Randle El. In mid-March, Washington traded for Lloyd and signed Randle El.

"He pushed hard for them," said Bob Saunders, Al's son and a Redskins assistant. "Everyone knows what Brandon can do on the football field, his speed, the acrobatic catches. With Randle El, it's what he can do in the slot, the double moves, his cutting ability. Getting them really expanded the offense."

Throughout offseason workouts and minicamps, Saunders taught the core scheme while experimenting and evaluating new plays. Soon, the 700-page playbook emerged, to rave reviews.

"In the spring, we saw a different offense than before," Brunell said. "It was more explosive. We got the ball down the field. We were more efficient. It's exciting."

Saunders plans to use the whole book, depending on defenses and how much his own players evolve. Through the first two weeks of camp, he hadn't called the same play two days in a row.

"We'll go into a game with 250 to 300," he said. "It's what separates us from a lot of offenses."

Asked by a visitor how it's possible to keep that many plays simple enough for players to process quickly and execute under pressure, Saunders pulls the cap off a felt-tip marker and reaches for a notebook.

"This is about as basic as you can get," he says, smiling, "not giving anything away."

In an instant, the page is loaded with circles, lines and what could pass for a Russian code. Some are mere dashes that slant left, representing offensive linemen. Others, representing receivers, are drawn with sharp angles and dart down and out, down and in. A couple of sweeping strokes are running backs floating into the flat.

Queen Right Jet Right 940 F Corner Swing

"We've just told all 11 players everything they need to know," he says proudly.

Queen Right and Jet Right set the formation and tell the line how to slant its blocks. The 940 is only slightly more complicated. The Redskins label their receivers X, Y, and Z, depending on where they line up. The X receiver listens for the first number, the Y receiver for the second, the Z receiver for the third. Even-numbered routes break in; odd-numbered routes break out; the higher the number, the deeper the pattern. F Swing tells the fullback to run a short corner.

"We don't even have to mention 'H,' " Saunders says, meaning the halfback. "He knows he's always last."

Suddenly, he's drawing again; same play, different words.

Brown Right 2 Jet Flanker Drive

"Bill Walsh's West Coast version," he explains, hoping the visitor will recognize the difference. He doesn't.

"He's told the flanker what to do, but no one else; they have to memorize their routes," Saunders explained. "We tell everybody what to do on every play, yet our verbiage is short and simple."

That simplicity enables Saunders to change formations on every down if he desires. He'll switch from two backs to two tight ends to three receivers to four receivers, hoping to create mismatches. It makes halftime adjustments easier, too. Basic formations stay the same, but overbearing defenses can be compromised just by changing a route number.

Where it gets tricky is that there are virtually no audibles: The quarterback and receivers must read the defense quickly and make pre-assigned adjustments.

At their best, Saunders' offenses never take what the defense gives; they take what they want.

"Sid Gillman and Don Coryell set the standard for aggressive offensive coaches," Saunders said. "They were my mentors. I was like a sponge soaking up information. Don was so creative, so open to new things. When it came to offense, he was a visionary."

He had to be. As coach at San Diego State from 1961-72, Coryell had the thankless task of competing for players with a slew of high-profile programs in California and neighboring states. One of his first tactical decisions was to heavily recruit junior-college players. That's how he came across Gibbs, a tight end from Cerritos College.

But JUCOs often entered school late; some showed up unannounced. They were eligible to play, but there was little time to teach them.

"Coryell figured if a guy could count from 1 to 9, and he knew 9 was a real deep route, and 8s were posts, 4s broke in... he could tell that guy what to do," Saunders said. "They might not run the right distances, but he could get him out there and work on that later in practice. So he'd tell guys, 'Just remember one number, and we'll be fine.' "

It worked so well that in 12 seasons at San Diego State, Coryell went undefeated three times. When he got to the Chargers, the old Aztec offense got a new, glitzier name: "Air Coryell."

Saunders' message today is much the same as Coryell delivered 45 years ago. He wants to play fast-break football, the kind he fell in love with as a kid in California. You'll love it, too, he'll tell you, if you just trust in him.

"We want to set the standard for excellence in the NFL," Saunders said. "We talk to the players about it all the time. If we're running on all cylinders and playing as we can, this system will allow us to set that standard. I'm convinced of that."

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:01 am
by portis26
Go skins!

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:04 am
by Chris Luva Luva
Goldfaith, do you have a link for the article?

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:35 am
by SkinsJock
What a great read and very apropriate to read right now. Apart from the background info that was very interesting I liked the fact that despite what everyone has implied this is a fairly simple offense to follow from the players perspective.

Again we find that the media do not know what they are reporting.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:02 am
by JansenFan
I love / can't believe he explained the verbage of his offense. It's awesome that in a few words he hands out the entire list of responsibilities. It also means he can make up a play on the sidelines, pass it into Brunell and each player will know his responsibility without having to practice it to memorize assignements.

Frickin' awesome.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:19 am
by BernieSki
I love this part!

"At their best, Saunders' offenses never take what the defense gives; they take what they want"

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:29 am
by JansenFan
That would make an excellent signature. Well that, and "Canadians are 'Eh holes"

Re: Al Saunders on the Attack

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:32 am
by REDEEMEDSKIN
BurgundyandGoldfaith wrote:One thing Al Saunders has learned in 36 years in the business: Playbooks, like mushrooms, grow best in the dark.


A TRO EXCLUSIVE:



The cover to Gregg Williams' 700-page master playbook*...










Image


*For illustrative purposes only. Playbook not intended for recreational usage or experimentation, and is strictly prohibited from being distributed to the public. Cause Gregg said so.*

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:26 am
by Irn-Bru
This was a great article!


(link?)

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:32 am
by JansenFan
Here you go. ;-)

It's from our friends at the Virginian-Pilot.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:49 am
by FiveWidez
We used the numbering system in high school. It was called a passing tree and it was easy for receivers b/c like the article says, if you learn the the routes 0-9 then you just wait to hear your number depending on where you lined up. Also, like the article says coaches can change plays just by changing a number. The problem, however, comes into play when you start running combinations of routes you have never done before. The receivers have no problem but as a quarterback you have to "see" the routes in your head when you go to the line of scrimmage (kinda like in Madden when you are on offense and you can push a button to see the offensive routes). When you run plays over and over again you learn where you are most likely to go with the ball against certain defenses. In this system you have to rely more on making quick reads after the ball is snapped and not as many pre-snap reads (thus the less use of audibles). This may be why Saunders mentioned Campbell not totally getting the offense yet. In the preseason games they were probably running alot of pass plays for him that he had run before and he didnt have to make alot of post-snap reads.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:57 am
by ArizonaHOG
Very interesting and informative post. This article sheds light on the mystery of Saunders' offense that I've been thirsting to learn about. Thanks!

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:55 pm
by DCGloryYears828791
Great article, just reading it got me excited for Monday night!!!! Football officially starts tonight and the world is good again!

I really love hearing the details of playcalling and route running, kind of makes you feel for Jason and Mark, thats alot of verbage to grasp!

Go SKINS!!!!

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:51 pm
by Gnome
Great article - we need more of this kind of reporting and less gossip about TO's hamstring and so on. The only curiosity I have is how this differs from the traditional Gibbs offense? We've heard for years that Gibbs ran the air Coryell system - which is what Saunders is running. Is Al's system basically the same with deeper pass routes? And he'll call fewer counter running plays? If anyone has an old article on the Gibbs version of Air-C I'd love to read it. I can't wait until Monday night!

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:46 pm
by yupchagee
Gnome wrote:Great article - we need more of this kind of reporting and less gossip about TO's hamstring and so on. The only curiosity I have is how this differs from the traditional Gibbs offense? We've heard for years that Gibbs ran the air Coryell system - which is what Saunders is running. Is Al's system basically the same with deeper pass routes? And he'll call fewer counter running plays? If anyone has an old article on the Gibbs version of Air-C I'd love to read it. I can't wait until Monday night!


In Gibbs's 1st yr, he started the season running an Air Coryell style offense. We gained lots of yards but lost lots of games (0-5 start). He switched to a run oriented style with 2 TE's & Riggins. We won 8 of 11 to finish 8-8. The next yr we won it all.

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 3:22 pm
by wbbradb
What an awesome article! Thanks for posting it.

The bit about there being "virtually" no audibles in Saunders' offence is particularly interesting. What does that mean? Does that mean the quarterback and receivers, for instance, have to make the same read of the defence independent of each other? Obviously, you can't call out "940" at the line if it's as simple to understand as he describes--the defence would know exactly where everyone is headed. But then how do you audible out of a running play into a passing play if the defence is crowding the line, for example?

Will

Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:39 pm
by yupchagee
wbbradb wrote:What an awesome article! Thanks for posting it.

The bit about there being "virtually" no audibles in Saunders' offence is particularly interesting. What does that mean? Does that mean the quarterback and receivers, for instance, have to make the same read of the defence independent of each other? Obviously, you can't call out "940" at the line if it's as simple to understand as he describes--the defence would know exactly where everyone is headed. But then how do you audible out of a running play into a passing play if the defence is crowding the line, for example?

Will


They comunicate telepathically. :wink:

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:03 pm
by xhadow
Now when they say there are no audiables I don't think that comment is completely accurate. I remember in highschool that there were a few adjustments that were made in the routes the recievers ran or the hole that the running back would be going to that were made in the snap count.

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 3:46 pm
by Braden
wbbradb wrote:What an awesome article! Thanks for posting it.

The bit about there being "virtually" no audibles in Saunders' offence is particularly interesting. What does that mean? Does that mean the quarterback and receivers, for instance, have to make the same read of the defence independent of each other? Obviously, you can't call out "940" at the line if it's as simple to understand as he describes--the defence would know exactly where everyone is headed. But then how do you audible out of a running play into a passing play if the defence is crowding the line, for example?

Will


One of the big complaints that Trent Green had out here in KC the past few years was that he couldn't/wasn't allowed to audible in the Saunders Offense. Of course, this came up after he threw an ill-advised screen pass that was easily picked off and run back for a touchdown by an alert cornerback who saw where the play was going. Trent complained that he knew what was going to happen, but made the throw because that's what was called. Saunders and Vermeil basically said that he didn't have to make that throw; there were other options on the field. I think the article sums it up best when it says that the QB is responsible for the reads at the line. They can't change the play itself, but they should know where to throw the ball to ensure the best result, and in this offense, they always have multiple options. The receivers are simply running their routes.

Anyone who thinks Al Saunders doesn't make a difference in an offense should review the game tape from yesterday's Chiefs game. Yes, the offensive line was beat up and isn't playing well, but they couldn't manage 300 yards of total offense, and didn't get a touchdown (or get one of their best playmakers, Tony Gonzalez, involved) until the end of the game. LJ only touched the ball 17 times. That wouldn't have happened if Saunders was still in KC, and that definitely won't happen with the 'Skins. Saunders was our best off-season acquisition, and though it may take some time for everything to click, we're going to be running on all cylinders come playoff time!!

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:19 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
For those worried about audibles, how many has Brunell called since Gibbs arrived? I can't think of one. Its more of the same, no worries.