Page 1 of 1
Chris Cooley: H-Back v. Tight End
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 11:49 am
by Justice Hog
In Al Saunders' system, Chris

ey will no longer be the H-Back for this team. This year, look for him to start playing the more traditional Tight End role.
My question is to those of you that are savy enough to fully know the differences between TE and H-Back.
How do you think this will effect

ey's play and/or stats this year? Will Sellers become our H-Back? Maybe this will create an opening for Jesse Lumsden at H-Back?
Or, maybe there are no H-Backs in Al Saunders' system?
I dunno.
Just throwin' it out there for discussion.
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 12:01 pm
by Mursilis
I don't think it's going to have much of an effect on his stats. Saunders knows

ey's a weapon and will try to work him into the offensive game plan, like Gonzalez in KC.

ey should have another great year.
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 12:04 pm
by gay4pacman

ey will still get open so i dont see him faltering too much.
"cooley is wide open, just throw it to him"
he's still open
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 12:20 pm
by hkHog
As the season progressed last year,

ey played more and more in a pure tight end role. He's better lining up at TE because he isn't the best open field blocker. I don't see much changing, he will primarily do the same things he did last year.
As for Sellers, he played more of a pure H-Back role last year. He is great lining up in the backfield as a lead blocker or lining up on the end of the line at TE. I think he will move to FB because of his blocking prowess.
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:00 pm
by frankcal20
Exactly HK
Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 1:13 pm
by yupchagee
I don't think Saunders uses an H-back. Sellers will play FB along with Cartwright. Lumsden will compete with Broughten & White for the last RB/FB slot.
Re: Chris Cooley: H-Back v. Tight End
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:17 pm
by JonC56
Justice Hog wrote:In Al Saunders' system, Chris

ey will no longer be the H-Back for this team. This year, look for him to start playing the more traditional Tight End role.
My question is to those of you that are savy enough to fully know the differences between TE and H-Back.
How do you think this will effect

ey's play and/or stats this year? Will Sellers become our H-Back? Maybe this will create an opening for Jesse Lumsden at H-Back?
Or, maybe there are no H-Backs in Al Saunders' system?
I dunno.
Just throwin' it out there for discussion.
Whether he is a h-back or TE, his production will drop this year. He is no longer the second recieving option on offense. I am sure he will be used in the red zone effectively, but his total receptions will drop. Just my

Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 1:18 am
by yupchagee
It might not hurt his production so much. We'll see more single coverage by a LB.
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 1:41 am
by Punu
As the season progressed last year,

ey played more and more in a pure tight end role. He's better lining up at TE because he isn't the best open field blocker. I don't see much changing, he will primarily do the same things he did last year.
As for Sellers, he played more of a pure H-Back role last year. He is great lining up in the backfield as a lead blocker or lining up on the end of the line at TE. I think he will move to FB because of his blocking prowess.
very well said. personally I think he's gonna get mroe reception yards and a play a bigger role in our offense... even with more WR's on the squad. He's got to much talent not to.
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 3:09 am
by 1niksder
hkHog wrote:As the season progressed last year,

ey played more and more in a pure tight end role. He's better lining up at TE because he isn't the best open field blocker. I don't see much changing, he will primarily do the same things he did last year.
As for Sellers, he played more of a pure H-Back role last year. He is great lining up in the backfield as a lead blocker or lining up on the end of the line at TE. I think he will move to FB because of his blocking prowess.
Chris
ey wrote:"I think a big misconception last year was that everyone thought I wasn't a tight end, but that's basically what I was last year," he said. "The 'H' is just what it was termed."
To hear

ey tell it, the position change is not really a change at all.
He says the only significant change is one letter:

ey is now a "Y" in offensive sets instead of an "H." The "Y" is often used as a standard description for tight ends in play formations.
link
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 10:44 am
by yupchagee
Last yr I thought TE was his natural position.
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 5:13 pm
by John Manfreda
He will be fine.
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:28 am
by SkinsJock
i seem to remember that

ey was the #1 TE (yards or receptions) coming out of college. I would expect that we will see improvement in every facet and that

ey will continue to get the opportunities he deserves. This guy has only gotten better and I think he will really grow with Saunders schemes.
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:25 am
by Chris Luva Luva
One thing that worries me is how

ey played in the last 3 games, maybe someone can shed some light for me.
Quick thoughts:

ey dissapeared in games, starting with Philly. Why?
1. Teams finally figured out we only had one WR?
2. The running game stalling, due to lack of respect for the passing game?
3. Santana being tripled?
4. Was he still being covered by LB's?
5. Playcalling? < I doubt
Seeing him taken out those games had a visible effect on him. I remeber instances of him throwing fits on the sideline.
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 10:40 am
by Deadskins
Chris Luva Luva wrote:One thing that worries me is how

ey played in the last 3 games, maybe someone can shed some light for me.
Quick thoughts:

ey dissapeared in games, starting with Philly. Why?
1. Teams finally figured out we only had one WR?
2. The running game stalling, due to lack of respect for the passing game?
3. Santana being tripled?
4. Was he still being covered by LB's?
5. Playcalling? < I doubt
Seeing him taken out those games had a visible effect on him. I remeber instances of him throwing fits on the sideline.
He and Santanna were our only passing options at the end of last season. Teams knew this, and keyed on him. His stats will actually go up this season under Saunders. He may have less receptions, but the ones he does have will be for more yardage, TDs, and critical first downs.
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:48 pm
by DeathByLinebacker#56

ey will have more chances downfield this year. I don't think we'll hear the h-back term anymore.