Page 1 of 4

Is this taking it too far in the name of "amnesty"

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:56 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
I just read this interesting article on MSN.com. Please click here to read.

As the child of legal immigrants to this country, I find this insulting.

I wonder what genius thought the following: "Let's re-write their national anthem in OUR language. That'll definitely force their hands on this issues, for sure!" :roll:

Why didn't my parents think of this when they came to this country, instead of having to bust their behinds to legally earn their permits to live here? :hmm:

It woulda saved a lot of time and effort. #-o

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:09 pm
by NikiH
I'm sorry Redeemed but times have changed and regardless of country of origin I do not think ANY ONE should be here illegally.

The fact that they re-wrote the anthem in another langauge is a bit disturbing to me as well. It's the Anthem of the United States. The langauge that the country claims as it's own is English.

I am a 2nd generation ancestor of legal immigrants to this country and I guess I do not understand why anyone thinks that it's ok for people to break laws because they believe it's better for themselves. Being in the U.S. illegally is breaking a law whether it goes unpunished or not.

Re: Is this taking it too far in the name of "amnesty&a

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:59 pm
by Redskin in Canada
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:As the child of legal immigrants to this country, I find this insulting.
As if any Spanish-speaking immigrants could ever care about your hypocrisy and self-indulgence!

I know many hard-working people who have emigrated to other countries with nothing on their shoulders and have made great citizens and have contributed to build countries.

I never expected much from you but today you hit rock bottom. Do not -ever- type another message in Spanish (or any other language) in this board. You will insult the language itself.

Some of the most critical people about immigrants are immigrants or the sons and daughters of immigrants themselves. Congratulations for contributing with hate to a debate loaded already with race and culture discrimination.

Re: Is this taking it too far in the name of "amnesty&a

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:20 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Redskin in Canada wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:As the child of legal immigrants to this country, I find this insulting.
As if any Spanish-speaking immigrants could ever care about your hypocrisy and self-indulgence!

Hipocrisy? Please elaborate.

I know many hard-working people who have emigrated to other countries with nothing on their shoulders and have made great citizens and have contributed to build countries.

As do I, the best example being my parents. Looks like we have more in common than you choose to believe.

I never expected much from you but today you hit rock bottom. Do not -ever- type another message in Spanish (or any other language) in this board. You will insult the language itself.

Lamento que no te haya gustado lo que escribí desde un principio. En otra ocasión te pediré permiso para hacerlo, ¿esta bién?

Me asombra el valor que tienes tú de tratar de limitar lo que yo puedo o no puedo escribir en este medio.

De igual manera estoy bastante disgustado que un hombre tan educado como tú haya cometido el error de no intentar hacer preguntas con respecto a mi opinión, antes de reventar con una declaración tan absurda como el querer censurarme.

Obviamente, lo que escribí no te parece, pero tampoco lo que tu has dicho contribuye a una discusión civilizada soobre el asunto. Avísame cuando tengas algo constructivo para contribuir al respecto... :roll:


Some of the most critical people about immigrants are immigrants or the sons and daughters of immigrants themselves. Congratulations for contributing with hate to an already race and culture discrimination debate.


Yup, you know me. [sarcasm]All hate, all the time.[/sarcasm] :up:

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:28 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
NikiH wrote:I'm sorry Redeemed but times have changed and regardless of country of origin I do not think ANY ONE should be here illegally.

No offense taken, NikiH.

I believe there is certainly room/need for immigration reform, however, I disagree on the "demands" made by a group of people that, legally, shouldn't be here in the first place. I can empathize, but I won't sympathize with the methods being used. My 2 cents

Re: Is this taking it too far in the name of "amnesty&a

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:36 pm
by Redskin in Canada
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Looks like we have more in common than you choose to believe.
Hell no. First, I am not an immigrant, nor the son of one. But if I was, I would not be "insulted" by others desire to be proud of their culture and language. I have -nothing- to say and waste my time on you. You have been called a hypocrite before by others. Now I am convinced of it.

And no, not a word in Spanish to you -ever- again.

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:53 pm
by Justice Hog
My only problem with the "immigrants" is their desire to come into this country and immediately start getting welfare and/or other government hand-outs.

As for changing the tune to another language, I have no problems with that.

Hell, I'm Irish and my great grand-parents came over on the boat from Donegal, I'm surprised a bunch of Irish Guys didn't try to change the National Anthem to "Why Don't We Get Drunk and Screw"!

Yes, immigrants can someday become viable, successful citizens. I just hate the ones that come here expecting "hand outs" from day one.

Capiche?

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:28 pm
by TincoSkin
well this has turned into i hate immigrants thread... now about the topic that was posted, why should we be insulted if the national anthem is sung in another language? i see this as an sign that our ideals have spread to those in another nation.

people were offended when jimi hendrix played the national anthem in his own way but now that version is played all the time and is a treasured part of our cultural heritige.

if people want to express the way they feel about freedom im all for it.

it may have been poorly timed and easiley interpreted the wrong way but its not disrespecful.

i could care less how people sing about how great our nation is.

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:29 pm
by TincoSkin
immigrants should learn english though.. first and formost as a step to becoming citizens

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:20 pm
by TincoSkin
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:place. I can empathize, but I won't sympathize with the methods being used. My 2 cents[/color]


you mean like non violent marches or singing about freedom? what methods am i missing?

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:22 pm
by thaiphoon
Screw the illegal immigrants. Noone should be here unless they have arrived legally.

The National Anthem sung in any other language but English is an insult

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:18 pm
by Redskins Rule
TincoSkin wrote:immigrants should learn english though.. first and formost as a step to becoming citizens


Thats why I hate the fact that they translated our national anthem into their language. If they want to be an American.....I"m all for it! I thought it was great seeing Manny Ramirez make the move! But LEARN MY LANGUAGE OR GO BACK TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY!

And Tincoskin, Those "Non-Violent" marches include waiving a Mexican Flag! THAT IS INSULTING! IF YOU WANT TO BE A CITIZEN OF MY COUNTRY YOU BETTER BE WAIVING MY FLAG!!!! If they can't do that then they need to go back! :twisted:

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:45 pm
by TincoSkin
Redskins Rule wrote:
TincoSkin wrote:immigrants should learn english though.. first and formost as a step to becoming citizens


Thats why I hate the fact that they translated our national anthem into their language. If they want to be an American.....I"m all for it! I thought it was great seeing Manny Ramirez make the move! But LEARN MY LANGUAGE OR GO BACK TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY!

And Tincoskin, Those "Non-Violent" marches include waiving a Mexican Flag! THAT IS INSULTING! IF YOU WANT TO BE A CITIZEN OF MY COUNTRY YOU BETTER BE WAIVING MY FLAG!!!! If they can't do that then they need to go back! :twisted:



are you insulted by people that fly the irish flag out side of their house?? common man people in a crapy country want freedom how can you hate that?

Re: Is this taking it too far in the name of "amnesty&a

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:29 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Redskin in Canada wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Looks like we have more in common than you choose to believe.
Hell no. First, I am not an immigrant, nor the son of one. But if I was, I would not be "insulted" by others desire to be proud of their culture and language. I have -nothing- to say and waste my time on you. You have been called a hypocrite before by others. Now I am convinced of it.

And no, not a word in Spanish to you -ever- again.
:-({|=

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:41 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
TincoSkin wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:place. I can empathize, but I won't sympathize with the methods being used. My 2 cents[/color]


you mean like non violent marches or singing about freedom? what methods am i missing?


1) Demanding amnesty, for one. I mean, it's okay for illegal immigrants to demand something, but it's wrong to DEMAND that they leave? :hmm: Shoot, if I were in any country illegally, the last thing I'd do is DEMAND anything. Freedom, after all isn't free. N'est pas?

2) Boycotts of U.S. goods, taking off from work, etc. It's definitely a noble idea, but it also dos more harm than good for the cause of immigrant reform. A lot of the companies that will be boycotted actually ADVOCATE immigraion reform laws. Why bite the hand that feeds you? There can certainly be other alternatives that are win-win for all.

3) Changing the national anthem. It's not wrong to transalte the song into spanish (after all, the pledge has been translated already and stays true to the original), so long as you stay true to the original and NOT try to pass it off as an "alternative". I'd love to see how some of my parents compatriots would react if I wen back home and all of a sudden decided to translate the song and alter it to better suit my values. Yeah, that oughta sit well with the general population. :roll:

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:30 pm
by NikiH
TincoSkin wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:place. I can empathize, but I won't sympathize with the methods being used. My 2 cents[/color]


you mean like non violent marches or singing about freedom? what methods am i missing?


How about their sick out tomorrow. Apparently tomorrow they will all not work or purchase goods. I'd also like to know if their children will still attend the schools that my tax dollars pay for and if they will still be using that those same tax dollars fund. My issue is that this class of immigrant gets a hand out without even asking for it. We all pay taxes on our income, they do not. Our taxes fund the things that make this country function including the very government they are trying to impress their message upon. Pathetic.

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:33 pm
by NikiH
RIC, you know I appreicate your presence here and respect your opinion however, I believe these people are in the wrong. We are funding their childrens' educations and paying for things they use everyday. It is not fair that their children who are here illegally (not undocumented- that term pisses me off, call it what it is) are taking resources from every child whose parents like me bust their butts everyday for a minimum salary only to have a huge percentage deducted for taxes.

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:44 pm
by 1niksder
Immigrants - I have no problem with.

Non english speaking immigrants - it depends on my mood but it's their handicap not mine.

Illegal immigrants - slight problem here, they have mostly out stayed their visas and can be tracked to a extent.

Illegal aliens - Now this is were I have my problems, not only have they entered the country illegally but they now feel they have the right to make demands.

I guess they can do that when you start giving them labels that the have no right to like "Immigrants". The didn't migrate to the US they snuck in.

Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:11 pm
by NikiH
Excellent point niksder, I guess I never really thought about that. Undocumented and immigrant are both incorrect.

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 12:55 am
by 1niksder
NikiH wrote:Excellent point niksder, I guess I never really thought about that. Undocumented and immigrant are both incorrect.

We forget there is a process in place to come here and be who you want to be. What ever that is.
We issue visas for...
Visitors, Education, Asylum, Work, we even have visas to cover most hardships. Do they apply for them?

No. they just walk across the border and become members of the population. To do as they please. If they come here to work then get a work visa. Whatever the reason they get the visa and legally enter the country they can always apply for permanent residence and follow the path of citizenship, the way it is written out in the law books. They don't do that the sneak in and then want to demand that they become citizen and demand rights that they don't deserve.

Why don't they get work visas? Because then they'd pay taxes on the wages they earn. Why start following the law now (that wouldn't go well with being here illegally).

Why not a visitors visas? Because Juan or whatever his name maybe read in a book published by the Mexican Govt. says that two miles down the road he can avoid customs and the Red tape.

If they are all having a rally at a known spot, I thing Custom agents, DHS, INS and a few other alphabet groups should meet up with them and document these people. They don't have to be deported unless they have done something wrong here (or something so bad where they are coming from we just don't want them here) Those wanted in Mexico, we can give them a book on how to sneak back into Juarez.

Will this happen doubt it

Let a the NCPAA decide that they are going to get together somewhere. Not only will you not see it broadcast on the news but there would be a major drop in street narcotics right after the aforementioned get together.


I'm not drinking I didn't mean NAACP, NCPAA= Neighborhood Corner Pharmaceutical Association on America

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 6:43 am
by Chris Luva Luva
Most of the people in this country are children of immigration...unless your native american. :wink:

Im a descendant of importation. :twisted:

OFFEND AM I! :lol:


On a serious note.

I believe that this country should be accessible to anyone who is willing to abide by its laws. If you'd like to take advantage of the rights, freedoms, oppurtunites of this country than knock yourself out. BUT! Please do it legally and in a way that doesn't burden the rest of the nation.

Can someone explain to me what is stopping some of these people from pursuiing a legal status?

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 8:28 am
by 1niksder
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Can someone explain to me what is stopping some of these people from pursuiing a legal status?


They don't have the time to do it legally. They got protest to go to and Star Spangled Banners to re-write.

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:03 am
by Redskin in Canada
NikiH wrote:RIC, you know I appreicate your presence here and respect your opinion however, I believe these people are in the wrong. We are funding their childrens' educations and paying for things they use everyday. It is not fair that their children who are here illegally (not undocumented- that term pisses me off, call it what it is) are taking resources from every child whose parents like me bust their butts everyday for a minimum salary only to have a huge percentage deducted for taxes.

Thanks. Let me add a little perspective here...

I do not participate in political threads. And this one is turned from one with prejudice and ignorance into a racist and political thread very rapidly. The issue was posted in a stupid manner from the beginning as an "insult" poll and the debate can only go downhill from there.

1) Language.

I guess those stupid Poles, Germans, Italians, Portuguese, Eastern Europeans and about EVERYBODY that came more than a generation ago through Ellis Island or the ENTIRE African population who came as -SLAVES- in a lot less dignified way, would not be welcome in this country now because...

... they could not speak English when they came!!!???

You see. It is/was -their- fault. They were not born in an Anglo-Saxon country. They did not speak "English" when they came. Sure we must agree :roll: with the stupid posts above that ALL those that do not or did not speak English when they come/came to our countries (USA or Canada) should be sent back, even graveyard and coffin for those who passed away already.

God have mercy, some of them were not or are not even WHITE!!!??? Well, as long as they are slaves or second-class citizens it is fine, I guess. :roll:

You see, languages are a beautiful thing. There are some things that can only be said ,or at least are said best, in one specific language. I do not care if it is French, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian or even English. To me a person that speaks more than one language, and many immigrants do and others learn it by necessity, is a more educated person. Those who only speak one language, English or any other, quite frankly are more ignorant than those who speak several.

Canada is officially a bilingual country. Canada is also a multicultural country -officially-. Nobody is less a of a Canadian because they wave the Italian flag on their National Day in Toronto. Nobody is less of a Canadian because Caribbean countries flags are waved through the Caribbana Festival. I could go on and on with Ukrainian flags in the West, Croatian flags in Montreal, Irish flag on St. Pats Day or the Mexican flag May 5.

There is A LOT to be gained by receiving the different cultures as they are to form your country. These are hard-working people usually the ones that are willing to start from scratch. For a country that was formed in this way with so many beautiful stories about immigration, some of you really sound KKK.

2. The economic issue.

YOUR tax dollars paying for their children education??? Do not make me laugh. These people PAY taxes for everything they buy. They subsidize with their work your food, your house, and the labour that goes into a myriad of things you chose NOT to see.

Their undocumented/illegal status makes them vulnerable to pay the BIGGEST taxes of them all: they are exploited in EVERY possible and conceivable way!!! From the guy that does not pay them and fires them at the end of a job, to the guy that pays a ton of money LESS than a normal worker would if the employees were documented/legal.

I have witnessed a myriad of cases of money wiring fraud in which companies pocket part or even the whole amount of money being sent back to their families at home with NO CHANCE to seek legal action by them because of their status.

Illegal workers exist in the USA because of a hypocrite double standard. You want them. You need them. You keep them. You use them. You exploit them. And the status quo is SOOOO good (all work, no rights) that it is very difficult to change in law.

For years, a number of governments have suggested to have a legalised documented/temporary work program agreement to the USA. It has never flown in your country. Do you know why? Because it does not make economic sense to those who profit explicitly and implicitly and they PROFIT ALOT.

It is better to accumulate this amount of people with NO RIGHTS at the lower end of the work scale and exploit them until they die. That way, they will never get to be educated and compete for real jobs, at least not the first generation.

3. The political dimension.

The new immigrants to ANY country have always had a tough time to arrive everywhere. For the younger crowd, I recommend you go and rent the movie "Gangs of New York". You will witness the way families, women and children were "welcomed" at the Port side of NY by the established "prior generation" gangs. See how the new immigrants were exploited economically and by unscrupulous politicians. Form has changed but everything else has not really changed. Every wave of immigrants will face its own "welcome" by the previous one.

Those who know a bit of political philosophy will remember the statement made at the beginning of the XX century: Quantity makes a qualitative change. You choose not to become aware of this but this movement NOW is BIGGER in numbers than the Civil Rights movement.

And you know what? Like the civil rights movement, they will ALSO succeed because justice is on -their- side. Because it is the right thing to do. Because you will be a better and stronger country for it. You do not see it now. And that is understandable.

But it does not matter. This change is irreversible whether you like it or not. History has been and will be my witness. I have seen and studied movements of people across borders all over the world.

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:57 am
by 1niksder
Redskin in Canada wrote:Thanks. Let me add a little perspective here...

I do not participate in political threads. And this one is turned from one with prejudice and ignorance into a racist and political thread very rapidly. The issue was posted in a stupid manner from the beginning as an "insult" poll and the debate can only go downhill from there.

Started out as a questioned from TRO so maybe it was doomed from the start :lol: You call it prejudice ,ignorant, racist and political. I can agree with some of this, but the subject is kind of political, it involves a particular race, some have pre judged opinions on this and some have know idea what's going on.

Redskin in Canada wrote:1) Language.

I guess those stupid Poles, Germans, Italians, Portuguese, Eastern Europeans and about EVERYBODY that came more than a generation ago through Ellis Island or the ENTIRE African population who came as -SLAVES- in a lot less dignified way, would not be welcome in this country now because...

... they could not speak English when they came!!!???

You see. It is/was -their- fault. They were not born in an Anglo-Saxon country. They did not speak "English" when they came. Sure we must agree :roll: with the stupid posts above that ALL those that do not or did not speak English when they come/came to our countries (USA or Canada) should be sent back, even graveyard and coffin for those who passed away already.

God have mercy, some of them were not or are not even WHITE!!!??? Well, as long as they are slaves or second-class citizens it is fine, I guess. :roll:

You see, languages are a beautiful thing. There are some things that can only be said ,or at least are said best, in one specific language. I do not care if it is French, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian or even English. To me a person that speaks more than one language, and many immigrants do and others learn it by necessity, is a more educated person. Those who only speak one language, English or any other, quite frankly are more ignorant than those who speak several.

Canada is officially a bilingual country. Canada is also a multicultural country -officially-. Nobody is less a of a Canadian because they wave the Italian flag on their National Day in Toronto. Nobody is less of a Canadian because Caribbean countries flags are waved through the Caribbana Festival. I could go on and on with Ukrainian flags in the West, Croatian flags in Montreal, Irish flag on St. Pats Day or the Mexican flag May 5.

There is A LOT to be gained by receiving the different cultures as they are to form your country. These are hard-working people usually the ones that are willing to start from scratch. For a country that was formed in this way with so many beautiful stories about immigration, some of you really sound KKK.

No one is saying they need to speak english when they get here. Learning english would be better than rewriting the National anthem as a way of showing you want to belong. I learned German when I was there and had no intention of staying, it was just easier to live by speaking the language. I'm learning Lugandan so I can talk to my wife's Mom. Not speaking english and living and working here may not be wrong but it doesn't seem right, but that's not the issue.

Redskin in Canada wrote:2. The economic issue.

YOUR tax dollars paying for their children education??? Do not make me laugh. These people PAY taxes for everything they buy. They subsidize with their work your food, your house, and the labour that goes into a myriad of things you chose NOT to see.

Their undocumented/illegal status makes them vulnerable to pay the BIGGEST taxes of them all: they are exploited in EVERY possible and conceivable way!!! From the guy that does not pay them and fires them at the end of a job, to the guy that pays a ton of money LESS than a normal worker would if the employees were documented/legal.

I have witnessed a myriad of cases of money wiring fraud in which companies pocket part or even the whole amount of money being sent back to their families at home with NO CHANCE to seek legal action by them because of their status.

Illegal workers exist in the USA because of a hypocrite double standard. You want them. You need them. You keep them. You use them. You exploit them. And the status quo is SOOOO good (all work, no rights) that it is very difficult to change in law.

For years, a number of governments have suggested to have a legalised documented/temporary work program agreement to the USA. It has never flown in your country. Do you know why? Because it does not make economic sense to those who profit explicitly and implicitly and they PROFIT ALOT.

It is better to accumulate this amount of people with NO RIGHTS at the lower end of the work scale and exploit them until they die. That way, they will never get to be educated and compete for real jobs, at least not the first generation.

I've got a problem with the companies that playing illegals and if the workers entered the counrty legally, they would have work visas and be protected just like any other worker.
By them not paying taxes on the wages that the earn we as law abiding taxpayers are shouldering more of the burden when their kids are going to public schools

Redskin in Canada wrote:3. The political dimension.

The new immigrants to ANY country have always had a tough time to arrive. For the younger crowd, I recommend you go and rent the movie "Gangs of New York". You will witness the way families, women and children were "welcomed" at the Port side of NY by the established "prior generation" gangs. See how the new immigrants were exploited economically and by unscrupulous politicians. Form has changed but everything else has not really changed. Every wave of immigrants will face its own "welcome" by the previous one.

Those who know a bit of political philosophy will remember the statement made at the beginning of the XX century: Quantity makes a qualitative change. You choose not to become aware of this but this movement NOW is BIGGER in numbers than the Civil Rights movement.

And you know what? They will succeed because justice is on -their- side. Because it is the right thing to do. Because you will be a better and stronger country for it. You do not see it now. And that is understandable.

But it does not matter. This change is irreversible whether you like it or not. History has been and will be my witness. I deal with movements of people across borders all over the world.

Here is the ignorant part... (politicians turned the illegal alien issue into a imagration issue and we fell)
In the Gangs of New York they came to this Country legally, stood in long lines to seek the dreams that brought them here. I'm not talking about them or their offsprings. I'm talking about the one's that are illiegally crossing the borders and still don't want to get and line and follow the process

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 10:20 am
by Redskin in Canada
1niksder wrote:Started out as a questioned from TRO so maybe it was doomed from the start :lol:

No kidding. His real name is Judas the Redeemed. You see, it's US versus THEM and he already crossed the cultural divide, Get it?

No one is saying they need to speak english when they get here.


Really?

TincoSkin wrote:immigrants should learn english though.. first and formost as a step to becoming citizens


Learning english would be better than rewriting the National anthem as a way of showing you want to belong.
So you would rather have international terrorists chant DEATH TO AMERICA! than friends who want to become citizens and even FIGHT on your side not to sing and embrace your country in the best they think they can?

OK :roll:

I've got a problem with the companies that playing illegals and if the workers entered the counrty legally, they would have work visas and be protected just like any other worker.
By them not paying taxes on the wages that the earn we as law abiding taxpayers are shouldering more of the burden when their kids are going to public schools

Precisely. What is stopping you from granting amnesty to correct the situation then? This is THE POINT. It is about legalizing an illegal situation. It is about FIXING this problem.

Here is the ignorant part... (politicians turned the illegal alien issue into a imagration issue and we fell)
In the Gangs of New York they came to this Country legally, stood in long lines to seek the dreams that brought them here.

Legally? They just CAME whether it was the Potato famine or anything else, they just CAME. The problem now is that the rules to immigrate are so complex, so discriminatory, so bureaucratic, and so obsolete that people have voted with their feet (the ones coming) and their pockets (the ones benefiting from their arrival).

Reality has de facto shown the inoperative and obsolete character of your immigration laws. What pains me is the lack of an attempt by several other posters to see the humanitarian dimension of this issue, FROM BOTH SIDES of the argument in a fair and impartial manner.