Page 1 of 2

Joe Jurivicous

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:46 pm
by John Manfreda
I am on the sign Joe Jurivicous band wagon now. I think he would complement Santana the best. What about u all

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:52 pm
by air_hog
Well, I think if we want to improve our WR corps, we should trade Carlos Rogers for Mike Williams :oops:...

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:57 pm
by Skeletor
I am on the sign Joe Jurivicous band wagon now. I think he would complement Santana the best. What about u all


I don't think any of us would complement Santana the best...
:D

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:41 pm
by Hog Heaven
I'd still prefer Randle El, but Jurevicous is my second chioce. I know Joe would give us a possession guy, but Randle El gives us versatility and is far younger.

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:15 pm
by ii7-V7
air_hog wrote:Well, I think if we want to improve our WR corps, we should trade Carlos Rogers for Mike Williams :oops:...


Why? Because M. Williams has done so well in the league?

Chad

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:30 pm
by stevejrfan78
I've always liked jerevicous he comes up with really big plays when he needs to. I would be extemely happy to see him in burgundy and gold next year.

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:33 pm
by MarcusBeNimble
although signing jurevicious would be great for the team, i can honestly say that i dont think he's the guy the redskins need to be a unquestionably legit threat to the top 2 or 3 teams in the afc....

My 2 cents

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:21 pm
by welch
I like Jurevicius (or however he spells his name), but is he fast enough?

Yes, you're right...I keep wishing for another Art Monk. Unrealistic. But Jurevicius seems more like a pass-catching H-back.

Main question: is he fast enough to shake a defender and draw coverage from Moss?

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:03 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
welch wrote:I like Jurevicius (or however he spells his name), but is he fast enough?

Yes, you're right...I keep wishing for another Art Monk. Unrealistic. But Jurevicius seems more like a pass-catching H-back.

Main question: is he fast enough to shake a defender and draw coverage from Moss?


He kept getting open against us... 8)

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:06 pm
by Hog Heaven
If he doesn't draw coverage from Moss, He'll keep the chains moving for us; however, if Randle El didn't darw some saftey help he could really burn a guy in man-man coverage.

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:26 pm
by leatherhead 377
A nice #3, possession receiver, but Wayne is what we really need!

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:32 pm
by sch1977
leatherhead 377 wrote:A nice #3, possession receiver, but Wayne is what we really need!


No way we go after Wayne, we don't need him. We already have a number 1 in Moss, we need a complimentary WR!

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:47 pm
by daddywatson
My fellow brethren, I hate to be the bearer of bad news(God knows I hate it)but if the CBA doesn't proceed, we are in a hell of a bind. Even if we do get our high profile players to renegotiate contracts, with the 30% rule and etc., heading into an uncapped year, we might be kind of strapped.
I'm not quite sure but, '07 might look pretty cool.

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:56 pm
by milkbone
Jerevicious is on the end of his career. Although we probably can't afford him, we need someone younger and faster like El. Patten is alreedy in his 30's, and Thrash is geting up there in football years as well.

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:41 am
by floridaskinsfan
I don't want Joey J. He has been good lately but we need someone a little younger. I hope we don't sign him unless it is a #3 receiver. We still don't know how Patten is going to come back but I think he needs to be the #3 guy and we get a solid #2 guy. I don't think Joey J is that guy.

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:38 am
by skinsRin
floridaskinsfan wrote:I don't want Joey J. He has been good lately but we need someone a little younger. I hope we don't sign him unless it is a #3 receiver. We still don't know how Patten is going to come back but I think he needs to be the #3 guy and we get a solid #2 guy. I don't think Joey J is that guy.


Nice to see your back Floridaskinsfan :up: haven't seen you in a while. Your right about JJ, I said the same thing earlier, to old and his best years are behind him.

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:39 pm
by MyrtleBeachRedskin
I think right now we are a now or never team. This team is being assembled to win now and allow Campbell to have some veterans around him. 2 years max with Joe still at the helm. So JJ is the best option. We did not have a Wr that could shake coverage against Seattle. We need someone who can catch the ball from anywhere. PLus we can afford him.

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:23 am
by Chris Luva Luva
MyrtleBeachRedskin wrote:I think right now we are a now or never team. This team is being assembled to win now and allow Campbell to have some veterans around him. 2 years max with Joe still at the helm. So JJ is the best option. We did not have a Wr that could shake coverage against Seattle. We need someone who can catch the ball from anywhere. PLus we can afford him.


I wouldn't call us a "win now" team. We're definately a lot younger/diverse than we were when we definately had a "win now" attidue. I think we have a decent mix of young/old/inbetween.

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:26 am
by skinsRin
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
MyrtleBeachRedskin wrote:I think right now we are a now or never team. This team is being assembled to win now and allow Campbell to have some veterans around him. 2 years max with Joe still at the helm. So JJ is the best option. We did not have a Wr that could shake coverage against Seattle. We need someone who can catch the ball from anywhere. PLus we can afford him.


I wouldn't call us a "win now" team. We're definately a lot younger/diverse than we were when we definately had a "win now" attidue. I think we have a decent mix of young/old/inbetween.

Yes, Chris we are not a win it all right now team. we have a bunch of young guys and vets. Thats what it takes to win now and to build for the future. We have a team that can be great for a number of years and if they are smart about it they can keep the winning tradition going this time around. Synder learned from his mistake back in the late 90's buying old players to win right away.

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:15 pm
by redskinz4ever
not to sure about double jj as a #2 ,i just want someone who will get open ....CATCH THE BALL and get us that play when all other outlets are covered who that will be i don't know.

joe jurevicius seems like a good fit

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:17 am
by old-timer
we'll be having fits with the salary cap this year. We need cheap, short term solutions. Going forward, Gibbs will fix the cap mess and then he can put in place llong term solutions. This year we want to at least make it to the NFC Championship and a good, tough, inexpensive, possession receiver like Jurevicius fills the bill. Ditto for a pass-rushing DE. We need a specialist who is effective, and regardless of how short his career is likely to be here, it's all we can afford. One of Gibb's special talents is to find the player with just the right fit for his needs, a player that everyone else passes on because of some major flaw.

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:41 pm
by Champsturf
I think Rod Gardner is available for league minimum. :shock:

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:30 am
by crazyhorse1
Champsturf wrote:I think Rod Gardner is available for league minimum. :shock:


Sounds like a joke, should be a joke; but I'm listening to a lot of suggestions that are no better than this one. Face it, Patten was not an upgrade over Gardner; Thrash and Taylor are utterly incapable of putting up Gardner numbers; so, probably, is JJ.
If we can't do considerably better than JJ, Patten, etc. we ought to go back to Gardner at the league minimum and save some cap dollars.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:45 am
by SkinsFanInHawai'i
Bringing Gardner back would be slightly less stupid than Philly bringing back TO.

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:17 am
by 1niksder
SkinsFanInHawai'i wrote:Bringing Gardner back would be slightly less stupid than Philly bringing back TO.

Yeah but if we are going to rob the Jets again I would consider bringing back LC (after he has reworked his contract.