Page 1 of 1

Offseason Shopping - Looking at the UFA Receivers

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:10 pm
by rick301
http://theredskinreport.blogspot.com/20 ... t-ufa.html

Offseason Shopping - Looking at the UFA Receivers
Subtlety has never been a strong point for the Redskins. Under Daniel Snyder, the Redskins philosophy has been to declare to their intentions and then they go make it happen. This brashness has ticked off other teams and the media, but has rarely prevented the Skins from getting done what they want to do. As Joe Gibbs took over, the bold ways have toned down a bit, but the Redskins still usually get what they want.

So when everyone knows the Redskins want to add a wide receiver, teams take notice. Bill Polian, GM of the Colts, went as far to say that Reggie Wayne ‘won’t be a Redskin’. Telling Snyder what he can’t have may not be a smartest move, but the Colts will place the franchise tag on Wayne and prevent him from signing with other teams.

Assuming Wayne is off the market, who does that leave for the Redskins to sign? Here’s a closer look at the top 5 unrestricted free agent receivers (in alphabetical order):

Antonio Bryant
69 catches, 1009 yards, 14.6 ypc, 4 TD, 56% catch percentage

Bryant finally began to achieve his vast potential in his 2nd season with the Browns. There is always question marks about guys who have career years just as they are about to hit free agency, but Bryant has always had considerable upside. His numbers look even better when you consider the below average quarterbacks he had throwing him the ball this year.

On the downside, the 56% catch percentage (percentage of completions on balls thrown intended for a receiver) is low for a starting wide out. Bryant is also reputed to have an attitude issue, having already worn his welcome out with the Cowboys. Of course signing ex-Cowboys is always a concern, but on the plus side he'd be very motivated to shove it in Bill Parcells face again.

David Givens
59 catches, 738 yards, 12.5 ypc, 2 TDs, 62% catch percentage

From the land that brought you David Patten, here comes former teammate Givens. Despite coming from the same system, Givens is much more of a possession guy than Patten. Givens has played 4 years in the league, and has had two consecutive strong seasons. Givens has also produced well in the playoffs, which the staff should look fondly on. That catch percentage is a good number for a possession receiver.

There really isn’t a lot of downside to Givens. He is what he is. If the Skins want to add an elite receiver, Givens isn’t that player. He is an above average player, who’ll give you 50-60 catches per year. Givens does come with some injury concerns, as he’s missed a few games every season since joining the league.

Joe Jurevicius
55 catches, 694 yards, 12.6 ypc, 10 TDs, 65% catch percentage

If you were to draw up the perfect compliment to Moss and David Patten, Jurevicius would be your guy. He’s tall, fairly physical and has good hands. Jurevicius also proved to be a good red zone target this year with 10 touchdowns, more than any receiver on Washington. Jurevicius would also be a good security blanket for Jason Campbell if he does see action in 2006.

On the negative side, Jurevicius hasn’t exactly proven to be an iron man. He’s been injured and missed significant time in 2 of the past 3 seasons. Jurevicius is the definition of a possession receiver, that 12.6 yards per catch rate is his highest since leaving the Giants in 2001. It wouldn’t surprise anyone in the slightest if Jurevicius is pulling on a Redskins jersey come training camp.

Keenan McCardell
70 catches, 917 yards, 13.1 ypc, 9 TDs, 65% catch percentage

Another player who fits the bill for what the Redskins may want in a new receiver. McCardell has had a great career, with over 800 catches to date. He’s played with and had tremendous success with Mark Brunell back in Jacksonville. With Brunell he was one of the better receivers in the NFL, surpassing 80 catches and 1000 yards in 4 of the 6 seasons they spent together. McCardell would be an interesting signing as he was cut by the Redskins way back in Gibbs’ 1st tenure.

Obviously the big downside to McCardell is age. He’s 36 years old, and has played 14 years in the NFL. Older receivers tend to break down quickly and if McCardell falls off that cliff, it would leave the Redskins without that reliable number 2 that they so desperately need. Money may be an issue with McCardell as well, as evidenced by his hold out in Tampa Bay.

Antwaan Randle-El
35 catches, 558 yards, 15.9 ypc, 1 TD, 50% catch percentage

Randle-El is an interesting prospect. Being that he played mainly as a quarterback in college, there is still potential for him to improve. He’s very quick and would solidify two weaknesses when you add his punt return abilities to the mix. As witnessed in the Super Bowl, Randle-El also brings his ability to throw and would add an element of surprise to the offense.

On the other hand, Randle-El is very similar to Santana Moss. Would the Redskins want two such comparable players? That 50% catch percentage is also pretty pathetic for a receiver, and Randle-El's career high is only 47 catches which isn't very impressive. Randle-El has also been a fumble prone over the years. Another concern is that Randle-El will probably end up being over paid off his visibility in the playoffs.


While the Redskins could go in another direction (restricted free agents, waiting for cuts), it is likely that one of these five players will be a Redskin next year. After sizing up the candidates, Givens is the best fit. He has good hands and is relatively young. After Givens, the other candidates are either older or don’t fit the Redskins’ needs.

So Redskin fans the question is this – who would you sign?


Any of these 5 would be great, but my vote is for Antwaan Randle-El.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:14 pm
by Skinsfan55
My pick is Antonio Bryant if the price is right...

Physical, good possession guy, can go over the middle, can make things happen with the ball....

Only thing he lacks is great deep speed, but a good jump will counter that.

I'm all for it!

I want to give him the chance to crush the Tuna!

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:23 pm
by air_hog
I like (in order)

McCardell - Yes he's old, but we need veteran leadership and a dude who can get the job done STAT. Then we can get younger through the draft.

Randle El - This is just a flat out playmaker.

Givens - Even though this guy isn't huge, he is a solid player and almost never drops a pass. Plus, he's a great Red Zone target.

Jurevicius - He had a great season last year, but it could just be a one time thing. Either way, if he cheap, then I hope he's a Skin.

Bryant - Yeah the guy's got talent, but he is a headache as well. Like we've learned in the past, don't let someone's talent blind you, you have to look at the total package, and this guy is carrying around some baggage.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 12:37 pm
by Skeletor
Who's blog is this? I couldn't find any attribution.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:00 pm
by patjam77
Skinsfan55 wrote:My pick is Antonio Bryant if the price is right...

Physical, good possession guy, can go over the middle, can make things happen with the ball....

Only thing he lacks is great deep speed, but a good jump will counter that.

I'm all for it!

I want to give him the chance to crush the Tuna!


No, no, no... I respect your opinion but he'll never fully realize his potential coming out of Pittsburgh...
GIVENS!!!! He has hands of glue and is strong enough to fight for a ball and go over the middle.
I like JJ but he IMO will only be effective as a 3rd WR. Hey if the price is right... Sign both!

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:05 pm
by Hog Heaven
Bryant is a punk, lets avoid him. McCardell would be a good guy on a 1 yr contract. Jureviius is old and injury prone, so thats risky, but Gibbs has a hidden gambler side so I could see him in Washington. Randel El would be amazing, but how much will he cost? Probably enough that we could get a good WR and a great return specialist (2 players for the price of one). And does anyone know if he wants to leave Pittsburg anyway. It would take a lot for extra cash to convince some guys to leave a superbowl champion. Givens is good, but how much of that was being Brady's WR in Belichek's Offense. A good QB with a genius Head Coach could have inflated his stats beyond his talent as I now fear may have happened with Patten. Another name I've heard thrown around is Robinson. That guy's hands are as bad as Gardner's. Plus he has character issues.

I'm curious about David Boston. I know he hasn't done much the last few years, but I remember his with Arizona and how dominate he was... any thoughts on if he could return to that? He would fill that possession WR mold we need.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:17 pm
by ejay183
I like David Givens, he seems like a good pickup

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:43 pm
by skinsfanpsu
Speaking of character issues, Boldin has many more character problems than robinson, or anyone else on this list. Just wondering, what were robinsons character issues?

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:52 pm
by riggofan
I wouldn't be disappointed to see Joe Jurevicius here. He had a great year with Seattle, wouldn't break the bank, and if we could get a good year out of David Patten it would be a nice receiving corp.

On the other side though, it would be nice to have a second real gamebreaker just in case Moss gets injured.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 3:16 pm
by The Hogster
McCardell is about to retire. We would be in the same position next year if we bring him in.

I would like to grab Koren Robinson, Randel El, or make a trade for Eric Moulds. He was suspended last year and was reportedly unhappy with the Bills...used to play for GW would be exactly what we need...another playmaker opposite Mosss.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 3:49 pm
by kadskin
I'd pick Randel El. But outside of these 5, is Boldin a possibility? or maybe a trade for Eric Moulds would definitely be a perfect fit.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 4:10 pm
by UK Skins Fan
Is Art Monk a free agent this year? Perhaps if he came back and caught another 200 balls, he might get in the HOF.

Sorry, that's probably a bit off topic. Seriously though, if anybody knows where we can get a Monk clone, then please email Mr D Snyder at "Danny@filthyrich.com"

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 4:54 pm
by Hog Heaven
skinsfanpsu wrote:Speaking of character issues, Boldin has many more character problems than robinson, or anyone else on this list. Just wondering, what were robinsons character issues?


1stly, when did Boldin come into the picture. I had no idea he was on the trading block. I also don't know of any character issues with him, although I'm not saying they don't exist. As for Robinson, he's had some durg problems, a DUI, and was suspended by Holmgrem in Seattle for a "team situation." Here are some links...
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/st ... 1169c.html

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/s ... ren22.html

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 5:15 pm
by Warmother
Of the 5 guys listed, I like Givens and Jurevisus the best. I think they would be the most affordable. I think Randle El might cost too much. McCardell is to old, and I don't like Bryant.
If I had a choice other than these guys it would be Eric Moulds, provided we could get him without giving up to much.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:26 pm
by The Hogster
He has since been to re-hab and has made a 180 as evidenced by his dedication to special teams and making the Pro-Bowl. I would give him a shot. He is from the east coast and would be much closer to his agent and family.

I think the kid made serious progress. I still think Moulds or Randel El are the best fit. Moulds would require a trade though.

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:44 pm
by 1niksder
In order Jurevisus, Bryant, McCardell, Givens and then Randle El this is taking into consideration what they may cost, how they would fit on the current roster, and what they would bring to the locker room. If I had to give something up for some one it would be for RFA Nate Burleson in Minny.

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:02 am
by LetsRollBurgundyNGold
Of all the guys listed in the original post and considering age and injury issues, I think the best out of the five is Antonio Bryant. He has the most potential upside to me. I remember being blown when he was drafted by Dallas because you could see he was gonna be a baller. And he still would be in Dallas were it not for Parcells playing favorites with Keyshawn instead of making it about who earned the position. Bryant didn't get traded because of talent, and really hurt the Cows in the end (who are they looking for now? A WR!). If Antonio were willing to buy into what's going on in Washington, he would be a great acquisition.

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:04 am
by Chris Luva Luva
I think Im going to hop off the Randle train for a moment.

Im still on the Koren train and Im catching a hitch on the Bryant train. I think Bryant would blossom here if he isn't going to be a character issue.

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:47 am
by crazyhorse1
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I think Im going to hop off the Randle train for a moment.

Im still on the Koren train and Im catching a hitch on the Bryant train. I think Bryant would blossom here if he isn't going to be a character issue.


Let's go for Bryant. He has the greatest upside...and Gibbs seems the guy to go to on character issues. Randal El's apparent talent has frequently amazed me, but why the bad numbers? Something seems to be missing. Probably can't sign him anyway.
JJ's now a journeyman, Mc too old, Givens a product of a system, not a talent. Focus on Bryant and cross your fingers.

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:47 am
by Snout
None of these guys is the complete package. Either it's character issues, or injuries, or age, or too many dropped passes.

We've already got a playmaker in Santana Moss. I say we pick up the guy we can get for the least money. And if the guy has some upside, even better.

We don't need a star. We need a solid contributor who will help open up the rest of the offense.

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:53 am
by patjam77
Snout wrote:None of these guys is the complete package. Either it's character issues, or injuries, or age, or too many dropped passes.

We've already got a playmaker in Santana Moss. I say we pick up the guy we can get for the least money. And if the guy has some upside, even better.

We don't need a star. We need a solid contributor who will help open up the rest of the offense.


Where are you going to find a "solid contributor" for the least amount of money?

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:58 am
by rick301
Snout wrote:None of these guys is the complete package. Either it's character issues, or injuries, or age, or too many dropped passes.

We've already got a playmaker in Santana Moss. I say we pick up the guy we can get for the least money. And if the guy has some upside, even better.

We don't need a star. We need a solid contributor who will help open up the rest of the offense.


The sign of a great team is depth. Look at the skins D especially last year. Even with so many injuries to players, they had others step in and contribute.

Depth is a weakness with our O. When key players went down, backups couldn't/wouldn't step up to the same play level. For example, when Thomas went down, the running game suffered. Same thing when Patten went down.

The point is you can not place everything on one player. Yes Moss is a TALENT. I love the way that guy plays. We need a WR that compliments him and can step in as a #1 if Moss gets injured. We need a potential star. Luckily, we have Gibbs who has a staff that can find those gems.

I can't wait to the first day of free agency to see who they've picked up.

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:13 am
by sch1977
crazyhorse1 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I think Im going to hop off the Randle train for a moment.

Im still on the Koren train and Im catching a hitch on the Bryant train. I think Bryant would blossom here if he isn't going to be a character issue.


Let's go for Bryant. He has the greatest upside...and Gibbs seems the guy to go to on character issues. Randal El's apparent talent has frequently amazed me, but why the bad numbers? Something seems to be missing. Probably can't sign him anyway.
JJ's now a journeyman, Mc too old, Givens a product of a system, not a talent. Focus on Bryant and cross your fingers.


I think Randel El's "bad numbers" are due to two reasons:

1. He isn't the number 1 guy
2. The steelers are a run first and run often team

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 11:38 am
by Snout
patjam77 wrote:
Where are you going to find a "solid contributor" for the least amount of money?


We had a number of solid contributors this year who were less than a $1M hit against the cap. Lemar Marshall (.636), Joe Salavea (.540), Derrick Dockery (.501) and Chris Cooley (.469). Granted typically you get your bargain players early in their careers before they hit free agency.

But the point is that we NEED to find guys who are good enough to start and who do not cost a fortune. With a finite amount to spend, this is a huge key to success.

I would be happy with an average receiver who will catch 40-50 passes and give our offense an alterative to Santana Moss. If we had another WR who could catch 3-4 passes a game, even if he was not a flashy playmaker, I think THIS season would have ended differently.

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:58 pm
by 36HAMMER
givens/k robinson either one and our offense will be special. heck with it, i'm greedy get both of them .let the other teams find other's to play with ha.go skins