Page 1 of 3

HOF Announcement Thread -- Put Monk In!

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:20 pm
by Irn-Bru
The official announcement will be made at 2 p.m. today.


WATCH OUR PRESS CONFERENCE FROM DETROIT - TODAY AT 2 PM

The Pro Football Hall of Fame's Class of 2006 will be announced on Saturday (Feb 4th). The Hall's Board of Selectors meet that day in Detroit, home of Super Bowl XL.

Following the meeting, a live press conference will be held starting at 2:00 p.m. ET. Representatives from the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche will hand a sealed envelope to the Hall's Interim Director Ron Dougherty that will include the names of the new enshrinees. Hall of Fame selection bylaws stipulate that the class will include no fewer than three and no more than six.

The announcement press conference will be streamed live on Profootballhof.com beginning at 2:00 p.m. ET. It will also be carried live on NFL Network, ESPNews, and SuperBowl.com.



http://www.profootballhof.com/enshrinem ... ry_id=1952

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:21 pm
by UK Skins Fan
I'm as nervous now as I was during any game this year. Please let this be Art's year. And it would be nice to have Grimm there beside him.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:22 pm
by Irn-Bru
We may have to start a Smack thread if he doesn't get in. . .


Come on, voters: do the right thing!

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:29 pm
by ejay183
Come on Art, this is your year

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:57 pm
by RedskinsFreak
What they do is announce who made the cuts from 15 to 10 to 6 and then those who got the 80% vote for enshrinement.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:03 pm
by RedskinsFreak
CUT TO TEN: Grimm and MONK OUT!!!!

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:03 pm
by RedskinsFreak
That's it. This selection board will NEVER put Monk in.

Irvin didn't make the cut from 10 to 6.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:04 pm
by UK Skins Fan
OK, let's move this to Smack.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:04 pm
by HitDoctor
Sports writers BLOW!!!!

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:05 pm
by Irn-Bru
Unreal. . .

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:06 pm
by RedskinsFreak
They picked the maximum six:

Aikman, Carson, Madden, Moon, White, Wright.

Two Cowboys, an Eagle and a Giant.

*tsk tsk*

Art Screwed Again

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:07 pm
by redskingush
What more did he have to do, Your in my HOF Art.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:07 pm
by ATV
Harry Carson and Warren Moon in, Art Monk out. LMFAO, what a joke. Complete joke.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:07 pm
by Irn-Bru
The class is:

Troy Aikman
Harry Carson
John Madden
Warren Moon
Reggie White
Rayfield Wright

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:09 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Monk has only one real chance now:

The veterans' committee.

Either that or a good 33% turnover in the board's membership.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:11 pm
by UK Skins Fan
And Irvin made the cut down to ten. Amazing.
Warren Moon? First time eligible? Really, I'm stunned. No I'm not. It's exactly what I've come to expect.

If the Hall of Fame doesn't define greatness by the same standards that defined Art Monk as a player and as a man, then the Hall of Fame stands for nothing.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:13 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Right or wrong, Moon's selction is probably the first for whom his CFL performance was a factor.

It's still wrong what they're doing to Monk.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:16 pm
by The Hogster
It's hard to argue with anyone who got in except Rayfield Wright...I don't see how in anyone's universe he goes before Russ Grim. Grimm was the better lineman, and won more rings. He also protected 3 championship QBs and didn't ride a superstar QB's coattail to any wins.

Art Monk should have went in before Harry Carson...heck Monk should have went in before a lot of people, but I can't believe that Wright goes over Grimm who was clearly the better lineman.

It is obvious that a lot of these old fat sports writers grew up in an era where the Pukes were "americas" team..they obviously have bias towards their players...and are fans.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:21 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Frankly, the next best chance for a B&G Day in Canton is Darrell Green.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:21 pm
by ATV
It reminds me of some other elections we've had recently. People seem more interested in winning the political game than electing someone with competence. I read that the HOF voters are political, that there is some back rubbing, give and take. I can just picture the two SI NY butt-buddies (King, Zimmerman) standing up (again) and frothing at the mouth against Monk and for their Carson (along with however many other NY-centric voters). I guess seeing the Giant's division rival make it the Superbowl so often really wet their pants.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:40 pm
by HitDoctor
ATV wrote:It reminds me of some other elections we've had recently. People seem more interested in winning the political game than electing someone with competence. I read that the HOF voters are political, that there is some back rubbing, give and take. I can just picture the two SI NY butt-buddies (King, Zimmerman) standing up (again) and frothing at the mouth against Monk and for their Carson (along with however many other NY-centric voters). I guess seeing the Giant's division rival make it the Superbowl so often really wet their pants.


I give up on the sports writers and the NFL in general with regards to giving the skins their due. It's us against the world!! I couldn't vote for Kerry b/c I'm an Obstetrician (tort reform etc.)

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:46 pm
by skinsRin
The Hogster wrote:It's hard to argue with anyone who got in except Rayfield Wright...I don't see how in anyone's universe he goes before Russ Grim. Grimm was the better lineman, and won more rings. He also protected 3 championship QBs and didn't ride a superstar QB's coattail to any wins.

Art Monk should have went in before Harry Carson...heck Monk should have went in before a lot of people, but I can't believe that Wright goes over Grimm who was clearly the better lineman.

It is obvious that a lot of these old fat sports writers grew up in an era where the Pukes were "americas" team..they obviously have bias towards their players...and are fans.


yes, I agree all the way.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:07 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Anyone know where I can find the list of 2007 first-time eligibles?

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:19 pm
by ATV
HitDocter, you're a gynecologist? Have you been "practicing your love with women"?

http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbuster ... .htm#_ftn1

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:32 pm
by Irn-Bru
ATV wrote:HitDocter, you're a gynecologist? Have you been "practicing your love with woman"?

http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbuster ... .htm#_ftn1



Let's keep this on topic, fellas. We all know that neither Republicans nor Democrats are the answer to our nation's health care problems. . . :-"


On an on-topic note, Rod Woodson was on NFL network after the immediate coverage. (I got to watch about an hour of the streaming video after the main press conference). They pulled up a list of candidates that didn't make it, and when asked which name stood out most Woodson said (without hesitation) "Art Monk," and went on to talk about how great he is.


It stinks that Monk didn't get in. BUT, we do have hope because there are people in the media that keep harping about the fact that he isn't in. I think that as long as that persists, that name will keep surfacing in Hall of Fame discussions, and Monk wont' just be forgotten. A fool's hope maybe, but it makes me believe that Monk still has a very good shot of getting in.

Does anyone know the closest that Monk has ever gotten before? Has he been to the final six before, and just not gotten the 80% go ahead?