Page 1 of 1

Dukes of Hazzard...

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:51 am
by SkinsChic
Well, I finally watched the movie last night. In my opinion it was a waste of 104 minutes.....what did you guys think ? :?

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 10:39 am
by Hogfather
I haven't seen it and don't plan on it. I enjoyed the Dukes T.V. show as a kid, but really have no interest in seeing the movie.
Thanks for your post, as it gives me yet another reason not to see it.

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:56 pm
by air_hog
I have not seen it, and I probably never will.

Put it this way, my neighbor who is a hard-core movie-goer and has pretty much seen every movie in theaters actually got up and left the movie 1/2 through!

That's not good...

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:25 pm
by skinpride1
Mrs.Simpson was smoking hot!!!!!

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:02 pm
by skinsRin
skinpride1 wrote:Mrs.Simpson was smoking hot!!!!!


Hell yeah! she looked great in those short!

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:04 pm
by SkinsChic
now...if only she could "act" :-)

Re: Dukes of Hazzard...

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:08 am
by redskingush
SkinsChic wrote:Well, I finally watched the movie last night. In my opinion it was a waste of 104 minutes.....what did you guys think ? :?


I second that motion.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:10 pm
by tcwest10
SkinsChic wrote:now...if only she could "act" :-)


You're setting the bar too high. Catherine Bach was no Angela Lansbury, either...her job was to be eye candy, and it worked.
The movie, in and of itself, was crap. Not every movie has to make a profound statement. It appealed to the audience it targeted, and wasn't one of those that you had to see twice to "get" it. :)
Ask Jake. He's closer to the demographic that Daisy Duke was intended to please.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:51 pm
by Jake
tcwest10 wrote:
SkinsChic wrote:now...if only she could "act" :-)


You're setting the bar too high. Catherine Bach was no Angela Lansbury, either...her job was to be eye candy, and it worked.
The movie, in and of itself, was crap. Not every movie has to make a profound statement. It appealed to the audience it targeted, and wasn't one of those that you had to see twice to "get" it. :)
Ask Jake. He's closer to the demographic that Daisy Duke was intended to please.


I'm never gonna watch the movie. I'd rather stare at the DVD cover to get the full effect. I takes less time, too.

Re: Dukes of Hazzard...

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:17 pm
by halter91
SkinsChic wrote:Well, I finally watched the movie last night. In my opinion it was a waste of 104 minutes.....what did you guys think ? :?


I agree, a few parts were funny, but for the most part it sucked.

Re: Dukes of Hazzard...

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:52 pm
by cvillehog
halter91 wrote:
SkinsChic wrote:Well, I finally watched the movie last night. In my opinion it was a waste of 104 minutes.....what did you guys think ? :?


I agree, a few parts were funny, but for the most part it sucked.


Daisy Duke is a red herring. That show and movie were both all about the car (and the car chases).

Re: Dukes of Hazzard...

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:24 pm
by tcwest10
cvillehog wrote:Daisy Duke is a red herring. That show and movie were both all about the car (and the car chases).


Gone fishing. :)