Page 1 of 1
Epstein and Ripken?
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:55 pm
by Steve Spurrier III
I know that we have a Nationals-only thread, but this news is so mind-blowing that I was afraid it would get lost. Moderators, feel free to move this thread if you disagree.
The Washington Examiner columnist Jim Williams is reporting that there is "an 85% chance" that the new Nationals owernship will land Theo Epstein as general manager and Cal Ripken as team president:
Sources close to both Major League Baseball and Wall Street have confirmed the ownership bid of Jeffery Smulyan is in trouble...Sources inside baseball with knowledge of the two remaining local ownership groups claim both have been in touch with Epstein and Ripken...This past Sunday, newspapers in both Boston and New York reported that there is an 85 percent or better chance the team of Epstein and Ripken will be part of the Nationals new front office.
http://www.dcexaminer.com/articles/2005 ... oljdub.txt
Needless to say, this is pretty incredible.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:03 pm
by JansenFan

If they land Ripken, I'll root for them.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:18 pm
by NikiH
Wow hun are you kidding me??? After all that stuff you will change your team?
They'd have to land Javy for my heart to be in Washington! lol (with baseball that is)
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:41 pm
by JansenFan
No, I didn't say I would change my team. I would root for both, unless they were playing each other.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:12 pm
by Jake
JansenFan wrote::shock: If they land Ripken, I'll root for them.
NikiH wrote:Wow hun are you kidding me??? After all that stuff you will change your team?
They'd have to land Javy for my heart to be in Washington! lol (with baseball that is)
Traitors!
I like the sound of the names but I'm skeptical of the combination.
I'm not so sure how well Ripken would do in a Presidential position and Epstein needs a big surrounding cast.
If he comes here, I think he may have to do his GM job on his own without the guidance of others like he had in Boston.
Although my first priority is to retain Bowden, I still think it would be interesting if it did indeed happen.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:24 pm
by JansenFan
Bowden is interviewing...not looking promising.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:28 pm
by Jake
JansenFan wrote:Bowden is interviewing...not looking promising.
I know. Boston is first on his list of trips to make.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:32 pm
by Redskins1974
The Washington Baseball Group (Fred Malek's potential ownership team) has been in contact with Ripken for well over a year now, maybe even two. Ripken said he wouldn't be interested in any sort of coaching/managerial type roles b/c they would take him away from his family (on the road) too much but did say he would be intested in developing a team and building their farm system. So, I don't think this possibility is that far fetched.
BTW - they posted the 2006 schedule... I'm hitting up everyone of those Balto-stink games:
http://washington.nationals.mlb.com/NAS ... hedule.jsp
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:41 pm
by Redskins1974
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2218778
Alright, this is hightly annoying. Does anyone know the best way to bombard Bud Selig's office with some friendly (right) emails about how he sucks?
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:00 pm
by tazlah
Baseball sucks!
Let's talk about Hockey... Toronto beat Washington!

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:07 pm
by JansenFan
What's that? 3 wins for each team now?
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:13 pm
by Redskins1974
tazlah wrote:Baseball sucks!
Let's talk about Hockey... Toronto beat Washington!

The Cap's are made up of a bunch of 20 year olds - you're supposed to beat us with those vets! I can't believe we were up 2-0 last night and blew it - those new rules are rough on goalies, lol!
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:31 pm
by tazlah
Redskins1974 wrote:...those new rules are rough on goalies, lol!
The new rules are also rough when you keep losing in shootouts.
TO has won 8; WSH has won 6.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:35 pm
by Steve Spurrier III
Jake wrote:I'm not so sure how well Ripken would do in a Presidential position and Epstein needs a big surrounding cast.
There isn't a general manager in baseball who doesn't need a big surrounding cast. And as for his needing "guidance", there is no question that Larry Lucchino held Epstein back in Boston rather than hold him up. Not to mention the fact that Epstein would likely bring most of his assistants with him to Washington.
Epstein would undoubtedly be an upgrade over Bowden. Epstein makes mistakes, but he's young and learns from them. Bowden, on the other hand, is a veteran general manager who still thinks it's a good idea to give a four-year, 16.8 million dollar contract to a shorstop with a .698 OPS. For all the good things Bowden did, that move will haunt the Nats until 2008.