Page 1 of 1
McCants
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:51 pm
by BossHog
Owens' suspension could be the break that McCants has been looking for.
And at a bad time for Skins fans. Washington will have to pay a little bit of special attention to him because you know that he wants to show them what a mistake they made letting him go.
Cover him up good on third downs and in the red zone....

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:35 pm
by SkinsChic
Yep ! It jsut might be his break out game...they normally do come back to burn us - we'll see if it happens tomorrow night. I hope he plays well but not well enough to beat us.
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:06 pm
by ArmyHog
The Eagles (4-3) will line up with unproven rookie Reggie Brown instead of Owens at one of the wide receiver spots for an important game at Washington (4-3) on Sunday night.
Don't kid yourself....McCants is not that good. For the WHOLE season he has 1, yes ONE catch for 22 yards. He has played in only one game. McNabb has 2,034 yards and 170 completions on the year and McCants contributed 22 of those yards. He probably did that in a game that was already decided so he was put in. The ONLY way he makes an impact is if Ade Jimoh covers him. Other than that he will just take up oxygen on the field.....that is if he is on the field. They have more faith in an UNPROVEN rookie than they do in McCants.
Here is the link....
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/football/nfl/11/05/ap.pa.eagles.owenssuspe.ap/index.html
Stats link.....
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/teams/stats/2005/eagles/
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:17 pm
by SkinsChic
Again Army Hog - you have to be on the field to be able to catch the ball. And you watch - if he gets on the field...he WILL catch the ball.
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 6:32 pm
by The Hogster
While McCants is not a complete bum...there is a reason why he hasn't been on the field for Philly either...he hasn't been activated by Philly for much of the year.
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:50 pm
by ArmyHog
Again Army Hog - you have to be on the field to be able to catch the ball. And you watch - if he gets on the field...he WILL catch the ball.
You are correct...if he is guarded by Ade Jimoh or he is left WIDE open.
Again....there is a reason he is not on the field. I am sure you follow him...he was released by the Eagles early in the year to make room for another player they needed to sign. A few days later they got him back. This does not happen to good players. Good players earn a roster spot and are active for the games.
There is "Proof in the pudding".... he doesn't have what it takes. If he did, he would be on the field and then he would get his catches. You have to be good enough to get on the field during a game in the NFL.
Look at that stats link I posted...there are players that 75% of the people on this board have never heard of before that have played more than him.
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:09 pm
by SkinsChic
Army...you just like to argue about him and I'm not going to...we'll see what happens tomorrow night.
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 9:36 pm
by Deadskins
McCants will definitely play. This is from the E-gals web site.
Word Comes Down: Owens Suspended
November 5, 2005
Nov. 5, 1:30 p.m. -- Andy Reid slept on his decision. Presumably, he tossed and turned and when he awoke on Saturday morning, he decided that the best thing for the Eagles moving forward was to do so without Terrell Owens.
And, so, as the team gathered at the NovaCare Complex early in the afternoon on Saturday, they did so without Owens, who has been suspended by the team for conduct detrimenal to the team, according to the statement the Eagles issued.
Thank goodness.
Reid made the right call here, cleared the air of the putrid, me-first cloud Owens has carried since that wonderful performance in the Super Bowl. Since that time, he has been all about Terrell Owens, and having a player dominate the aura of a team as he has done is absolutely counterproductive to an effort that requires every person in the building to move in the same direction ... The Eagles will refrain from commenting further on the matter until after the game in Washington, but I will offer some of my opinions here. As you know -- if you've been reading this space since Friday morning -- Owens' comments to ESPN on Thursday night were the final straw for me.
Hey, I understand that the Eagles accept the responsibility of knowing the risk they took when they acquired Owens in 2004. Agreed. They made a deal with Owens, and he lived up to his part of the bargain last year. He was wonderful. He played great football. He was good within the organization.
Owens, last year, worked as part of the T-E-A-M.
And then, after the Super Bowl, he went into his contract snit and has since proceeded to forget about the rest of the players in the locker room, his coaches, and the staff that helped promote him and aid him in any way he needed last year.
I can tell you that I've taken it personally every time Owens has gone off with his selfish actions. He turned his back on the Eagles because he wants more money. Now he has put his future in the NFL in jeopardy because of his greed.
Did the Eagles make a mistake, looking back, when they added Owens? I won't say that. His time as an Eagle may or may not be over, but I will consider the good times of last season as a great highlight of my years here. I will also consider his petulance of this year as one of the lowlights.
Reid did what he needed to do. Does it hurt the Eagles on the field? That remains to be seen, of course. Owens is a marvelous talent, a great wide receiver. But there are other players who have talent and ability and the chance now to step up and play. Instead of Owens catching his 7 or 8 passes a game, L.J. Smith may get a few more passes. Reggie Brown will have his role expanded, something I am excited to see. Billy McMullen, in his third year as an Eagle, has a chance to prove he can play and play well at this level. Darnerien McCants will play on Sunday night. We'll learn more about him.
Now that 70 percent of the offense doesn't go through Owens, maybe the Eagles will get back to more of the essence of spreading the ball around in the West Coast offense.
I certainly think Donovan McNabb benefits from Owens' suspension. I spoke to former Eagles quarterback Ron Jaworski on Saturday after news of Owens' suspension came down and the first thing he said was that it is a good thing for McNabb.
"How can Donovan even look T.O. in the face any more, much less work with him in the offense?" said Jaworski. "Owens showed Donovan another blatent lack of respect with his comments. He's been doing it all along. You risk losing the locker room. Had it been me, I would have immediately confronted T.O. in a man-to-man manner. What he did was deal Donovan the ultimate lack of respect.
"I think the Eagles are going to be fine. From a mental standpoint, it had to happen. Otherwise, it would have again been all about T.O. Now the players know he's not around and they have to respond. I think it will bring the team together. Andy has always been able to scheme to get his players open. He'll do the same here."
Nobody knows how the team is going to react against the Redskins. This has been a tumultous period for the Eagles, a wild ride. It could be that Owens has played his last game for this team. Who knows?
I have to admit that, before news of Owens' suspension broke, I was battling the idea of Owens wearing an Eagles uniform. I can tell you -- as I confided to many friends and workers -- that I didn't want to cheer for Owens against Washington. Isn't that sad? I actually wondered how I would react if he scored a touchdown. Instead of giving fist bumps in the press box to my co-workers -- under the guise of "No celebrating in the press box, a professional edict which I break -- very quietly -- when the Eagles score -- I imagined feeling little elation had Owens scored.
Now I don't have to worry.
He's not an Eagle. When you join a team, you pledge to do whatever it takes to win the Super Bowl. You sacrifice individual accomplishments to win games.
I felt Owens did that last year. I applauded him for that. Since the Super Bowl, he didn't care about the Eagles. He cared about catches and touchdowns and his contract.
For one game, at least, the Eagles enter an NFC East game without Owens. I am elated he's not part of the team against the Redskins.
Should he come back, hey, I will trust Andy Reid and his decisions. He is the leader. He is the head coach. He is the one who took the Eagles to the Super Bowl last year and who will win a Super Bowl this season. And if Owens returns, I would expect him to be part of the team again, to work with the organization to try and win a Super Bowl. If he can't do that, he shouldn't come back.
The Eagles march on, a team again, everyone pushing together, everyone working for the common goal. I think it's a monumental challenge to overcome the last few days of headlines, but the Eagles have a better chance to do so -- this is my opinion, of course -- with the 52 players they have on the active roster right now.
http://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/ ... p?id=38864
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:52 am
by NikiH
Of course he didn't see much action before now, they had T.O. McCants is not a T.O type of receiver but I guarentee you, he will burn us if we enter into the game with your attitude about things ArmyHog. He can catch the ball and he could be a great weapon for the Eagles. We all know McNabb can get the ball to him. So I hope that going into this game the coaches have BH or Terri's philisophy as opposed to ArmyHog's.
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:06 am
by tcwest10
I'm throwing my lot in with Terri. There's no way you ignore any pro receiver on game day, much less one that has an agenda.
...and believe me, D-Mac has baggage to unload.
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:52 am
by ArmyHog
I saw McCants in on one special teams tackle (I guess he will play special teams for the Eagles

) and that is it.
He was in on at least one play down by the goal line, where he was supposed to be a threat, on the final drive and got NOTHING. With the way Reggie Brown played DMAC should make himself comfortable right on that bench.
The whole point is not an I told you so....it is that DMAC is WAY overrated. Yes you cannot catch the ball when you are not in the game......that is why you have to show the coaches that you are good enough. Until you do that, you are not a threat and will NOT have a career in the NFL. Darn near anybody can go out make a catch here and there...look at the stats link I have posted. Who the heck is S. Spach?
Maybe he can land a job in the CFL.........or continue on with his music that he had going.
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20051106_PHI@WAS
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:54 am
by SkinsChic
I don't take anything as an "I told you so" from you Army...believe me it's not worth it.
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:01 pm
by ejay183
ArmyHog wrote:I saw McCants in on one special teams tackle (I guess he will play special teams for the Eagles

) and that is it.
He was in on at least one play down by the goal line, where he was supposed to be a threat, on the final drive and got NOTHING. With the way Reggie Brown played DMAC should make himself comfortable right on that bench.
The whole point is not an I told you so....it is that DMAC is WAY overrated. Yes you cannot catch the ball when you are not in the game......that is why you have to show the coaches that you are good enough. Until you do that, you are not a threat and will NOT have a career in the NFL. Darn near anybody can go out make a catch here and there...look at the stats link I have posted. Who the heck is S. Spach?
Maybe he can land a job in the CFL.........or continue on with his music that he had going.
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20051106_PHI@WAS
Wasnt one of the reasons he was always deactive was because he refused to play on Special Teams?