Page 1 of 1

Chris Cooley will go to the Pro Bowl!

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:03 am
by JPFair
If he stays healthy, Chris Cooley will go to the Pro Bowl this year. Whoever it was that decided to trade up to get him knew what they were doing. Can you believe how solid and reliable he is? He was lining up as a Wide Receiver yesterday, and even running routes that I haven't seen him run before. He's going to become a "go to" type of person ANYWHERE on the field.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:34 am
by redskingush
Chris has made tremendous strides as his career has started and I too see good things for him. As times goes on he will be a bigger factor in this system. I do however think he needs a new facemask. I rate his as the leagues ugliest.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:19 pm
by joebagadonuts
while i agree that cooley is awesome, i don't think this offense will be good enough to allow hiim the numbers that he'll need to gain national recognition.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:18 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
joebagadonuts wrote:while i agree that cooley is awesome, i don't think this offense will be good enough to allow hiim the numbers that he'll need to gain national recognition.


I disagree. In the redzone, he's Ramsey's clear No. 1 receiver. So long as Ramsey plays, Cooley will contiue to have an opportunity to rack up stats.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:01 pm
by joebagadonuts
i saw brunell looking for him on sunday as well. no matter who's at qb, i hope you're right. i fact, i'd love to be wrong (don't tell my wife).

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:24 pm
by Schlereth
He'll have good numbers and probably push for a pro-bowl slot. It will be hard to make it though, unless the Redskins offense surprises me. Their will be a bias against your team unless the TEAM is successful. Last year, Griffin, Springs, Washington and Pierce arguably should have made the Pro-bowl.

He's also in a TE heavy division. I guarantee atleast one of these TEs makes the pro-bowl. Crumpler will probably be the starter though.
Shockey - should have a better year due to McKenzie.
Witten - had the best year last year, Bledsoe likes his TEs, but Cowboys RT may need help blocking.
LJ Smith - now featured in an offense that sent Chad Lewis to the probowl one year. McNabb's scambling benefits his TEs (and visa-versa) but Owens could take balls away from Smith.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:44 pm
by cvillehog
I don't think he'll get enough publicity to make the pro bowl, but I hope I'm wrong. I mean, he's an H-Back, so what does he go as -- a tight end or a running back (as he's listed on nfl.com i believe)? So, if we consider him a TE, which is obviously more what his role is, he get's less publicity than at least two other TEs just in the NFC East.

Re: Chris Cooley will go to the Pro Bowl!

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:53 pm
by patjam77
JPFair wrote:If he stays healthy, Chris Cooley will go to the Pro Bowl this year. Whoever it was that decided to trade up to get him knew what they were doing. Can you believe how solid and reliable he is? He was lining up as a Wide Receiver yesterday, and even running routes that I haven't seen him run before. He's going to become a "go to" type of person ANYWHERE on the field.


If the Skins just had a QB to get it to him.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:57 pm
by MarcusBeNimble
I think hes got a much better shot at making the pro bowl in the NFC without a doubt. Shockey's overrated, but I gotta give it to LJ Smith and Whitten.

OH yeah and dont forget to throw Algi Crumpler in that mix either.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:02 pm
by hermitkid
Well, Alstott has proven that the voters get pretty creative when it comes to selecting players. If Cooley improves on his play maybe he can go as fullback....

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:10 pm
by Irn-Bru
He might very well go as a tight end. The voters themselves won't be stuck in the same predicament that Yahoo Fantasy Football finds itself in. He'll be recognized for whatever he does.

Considering that the Redskins probably won't be going 11-5 this year, though, I doubt that he'll make it (despite a great individual performance). Remember, our defense was the BEST defense in the NFC. . .and we got only one player from our starters to actually go. (It still disgusts me).

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:20 pm
by Primetime42
Going by Witten logic, he should be listed as TE.

Witten has been playing a lot of H-Back since his rookie year. Big reason why Parcells almost didn't carry a fullback.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:03 pm
by Shabba
Shockey is da man. I guess I say that because he is my fantasy TE

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:19 pm
by skinsfan#33
Last years pro-bowl voting had him lumped in at Full Back.

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:42 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Shabba wrote:Shockey is da man. I guess I say that because he is my fantasy TE

Too bad he got an ankle hurt against Arizona... :twisted:

Cooley was called on a penalty that killed his TD. Did you see anything wrong in that play? I did not see the penalty but I may be biased. :wink:

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:52 pm
by 1fan4ramsey
not without Ramsey throwing to him

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:54 pm
by Redskins1974
1fan4ramsey wrote:not without Ramsey throwing to him


I saw that answer coming from 1 million yards away... :roll:

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:04 pm
by joebagadonuts
Redskins1974 wrote:
1fan4ramsey wrote:not without Ramsey throwing to him


I saw that answer coming from 1 million yards away... :roll:


and it would only take mark brunell 100,000 throws to get there! :lol:

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 2:43 pm
by skinsfan#33
joebagadonuts wrote:
Redskins1974 wrote:
1fan4ramsey wrote:not without Ramsey throwing to him


I saw that answer coming from 1 million yards away... :roll:


and it would only take mark brunell 100,000 throws to get there! :lol:

That is funny and sad at the same time!