The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

It doesn't get much better - for a UK Skin, can you guys let me know what happened to Ramsay? Did he take a bad hit?

IJ wrote:It doesn't get much better - for a UK Skin, can you guys let me know what happened to Ramsay? Did he take a bad hit?

yea. a hit to his pride, brunell moveed the team. ramsey didn't.

huh?

RAMSEY: 6/11, 105 yds, 1 INT
BRUNELL: 8/14, 70 yds

yea a closeline, our offense was horrible but the defense was superb . It would have been 9-0 but antonio davis fumbled the ball

So did Gibbs just replace him because he ain't no good then?

How did the receiving corps do?

no, i expect to see gibbs stay with pat for a while. i just don't think it's going to work anymore.

Santana Moss was awsome 4 rec. 96 yards, i meant antonio brown

IJ wrote:So did Gibbs just replace him because he ain't no good then?

How did the receiving corps do?

gibbs replaced him because ramsey was knocked out of the game on an insanely illegal "clothesline" arm tackle right to the neck. it was the right decision to leave him out until we find out for sure how hurt he was, and how badly shaken up he was.

but i would think ramsey will start next week.

as for the receivers, they proved that switching from gardner/coles to moss/patten was a good move. patten made a couple clutch catches that kept drives alive (the kind gardner would've dropped), and moss had 4 catches for 96 yards, including an awesome 52 yarder with at least 30 yards of Run-After-Catch.

compare that to coles, who had 6 catches for 66 yards while being spanked by the cheifs, and gardner, who was not even active for the NC/NO game.

Ramsey moved the ball after the int., Brunell had 70 yards in almost 3 quarters, Ramsey had more than a 100 in a little more than a quarter, it's not that hard who to start if Ramsey is healthy, Brunell just started as he finished last year, no more than a 100 yds passing, hope Ramsey starts against Dallas.

hailskins666 wrote:no, i expect to see gibbs stay with pat for a while. i just don't think it's going to work anymore.

I can agree with that.Gibbs should keep Ramsey as the starter for now.I think it would unfair to pull someone out, not even getting a full half of play.I think it would be crazy to switch so fast.I have no problem with Brunnel and if Ramsey can't get it done in the next two or three games, then yes put Brunnel in.I think it will work with Ramsey.He is going to suprise some people next week with a win over dallas.

Thanks DCD.

LOVE the username.

THE RAM wrote:Ramsey moved the ball after the int., Brunell had 70 yards in almost 3 quarters, Ramsey had more than a 100 in a little more than a quarter, it's not that hard who to start if Ramsey is healthy, Brunell just started as he finished last year, no more than a 100 yds passing, hope Ramsey starts against Dallas.

I don't know who will start, Gibbs had nothing but praise for Brunell, even bringing up stuff from last year in his post-game press conference. Didn't really say anythinjg about Ramsey. Said he'll decide who will start at the end of the week. By the way he was talking he'll go with Brunell, it's like he was waiting for the first chance he got to put Brunell in. If this is the path he is going to take, don't expect Ramsey to come in and bail out the season 6 weeks from now when Brunell gets hurt or is playing bad. A really bad qb situation is about to unfold if Brunell starts.

If this is the path he is going to take, don't expect Ramsey to come in and bail out the season 6 weeks from now when Brunell gets hurt or is playing bad. A really bad qb situation is about to unfold if Brunell starts.

I believe that fans make more of a "QB controversy" than the players do. If Joe Gibbs tells Ramsey to play, he plays. The same goes for Brunell. If either of them have hurt feelings and play any less than 100%, then they aren't mentally and emotionally tough enough to play in the NFL.

A win, but our offense looked weak. Dont think we can hang with rest of the teams in the red zone.

Points wins games.

King Cali Skin wrote:Points wins games.

Absolutely right.

Now, I'm no math major, but last I checked, 9 > 7.

So...a "W" is a "W" (unless you're talking 'bout "Dubya" ).