Page 1 of 1

WIN

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:06 pm
by THE RAM
It's beautiful to start with a WIN, I'm impressed how well the defense is playing, also what's Ramsey's status, on the TV they said he was cleraed to play, why did Gibbs kept Brunell, they only runned the ball, Ramsey's made big plays, he shwed he can be real productive in this system, also what a CHEAP shot on him, that was an unecessary roughness play.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:16 pm
by skinpride1
Exactly and I feel that it was a bad call by the ref's on Cooley the defender was all over him.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:17 pm
by ATV
It sure is nice having receivers that can actually catch the ball, huh? Amazing.

Both Brunell and Betts played very well in backup.

Chicago played well,...both of their lines in particular....

Hard fought game, we'll take it.

Re: WIN

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:20 pm
by hailskins666
THE RAM wrote:also what's Ramsey's status
he sucked the entire time he was in the game. so did the rest of the offense. i hate to say it, but his career as a skin is over.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:21 pm
by THE RAM
Will Ramsey play at Dallas?

Re: WIN

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:24 pm
by skinpride1
hailskins666 wrote:
THE RAM wrote:also what's Ramsey's status
he sucked the entire time he was in the game. so did the rest of the offense. i hate to say it, but his career as a skin is over.
51 yard pass play to Moss and Ramsey put us down in the redzone to score.Yea we really stank with Ramsey in.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:31 pm
by redskingush
We will see Patrick next monday night, but maybe not in the NY-New Orleans area.LOL

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:33 pm
by gay4pacman
Im lost with Ramsey.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:42 pm
by ArizonaHOG
REDSKINS WIN....Hail Victory!!!

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:53 pm
by hailskins666
i just can't be confident anymore. he had a WHOLE off-season to prepare, and still looks like a deer in headlights.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:03 pm
by redskindave
Im happy as hell that we won, But we are going to have to stsrt scoring more points, Touchdowns instead of field goals, If the Redskins had an offense to match there defense we would be awesome.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:09 pm
by AZHog
hailskins666 wrote:i just can't be confident anymore. he had a WHOLE off-season to prepare, and still looks like a deer in headlights.


There's no doubt he can hit a couple of good plays but he NEVER has had poise in the pocket. Not that Brunell has much, but PRam's really going to have to step up his game.

Re: WIN

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:10 pm
by crazyhorse1
hailskins666 wrote:
THE RAM wrote:also what's Ramsey's status
he sucked the entire time he was in the game. so did the rest of the offense. i hate to say it, but his career as a skin is over.


What game were you watching? Have you checked the offensive stats or Chicago's ranking on defense or do you go only by the scoreboard?

Re: WIN

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 8:25 pm
by hailskins666
crazyhorse1 wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
THE RAM wrote:also what's Ramsey's status
he sucked the entire time he was in the game. so did the rest of the offense. i hate to say it, but his career as a skin is over.


What game were you watching? Have you checked the offensive stats or Chicago's ranking on defense or do you go only by the scoreboard?
did you not notice that other than the antonio brown fumble, both of the remaining turnovers were on ramsey? the line doesn't look good with him standing still in the pocket, and that for some reason has an effect on the run game. at least with brunell, the pocket moves a bit, and the o-line seems to do better when blocking, pass and run. the only offensive stats i need to see on ramsey is 1 int, 1 fumble lost. brunell, 0 int, 0 fumble. gibbs will pick the best man for the job. and i'll stand behind it. but i just think our qb situation is.... dismal, to say the least.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:00 pm
by Hoss
Overall, I'd give Ramsey a "C".

He threw 1 int, which I expected...and 1 fumble, which was tough to take. I saw some improvement, but at times you could still see flashes of his old insecurities.

Dammit, I'm still undecided with him.....but I'm getting impatient!!

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:09 pm
by air_hog
But Hailskins666, the only reason Brunell succeeded was because Portis was dominating. The only reason Brunell seemed good, was because Portis and the running game took the team on their back.

And Portis wasn't running better because of Brunell, it was because Gibbs finally was calling plays that suited his style.
Example: In the first half with Ramsey, we just had Portis line up 7 yards deep in Singleback formation and just ram him up the gut where he was pounded. But then in the 2nd half, the plays were starting to be called in Clinton's favor, Ex: Counters, Zone Schemes, and other plays where he could pick his hole.

Just think about this, even with Portis dominating the 2nd half, we only scored 3 points with Brunell and almost lost the game.

But with Portis struggling in the first half, we had a whopping 6 points! :roll: And yes, Brunell get us to the goaline, but threw it 2 yards short to Cooley when he had Sean Taylor wide open up in the corner.

Overall, I'm still 100% for Ramsey.